Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 238

Bitcoin, pricing dislocation and value investing

Price and value. Many investors think these two concepts are substitutable, but they refer to two different qualities. As value investors, we believe there can be large divergences between the two, which we call ‘pricing dislocations’. These pricing dislocations mean the price of something, in our case, the share price of a company, does not reflect the intrinsic value of that company. By identifying undervalued companies, investors can make superior long-term profits.

Price is what you pay and value is what you get. For example, anyone can know the price of Bitcoin, but do they know its value?

You can buy a flight ticket from Sydney to Melbourne for as low as $120 but think about the value you get from that trip. You get to transport yourself from Sydney CBD to Melbourne CBD in around two hours when by car it would take you a gruelling nine hours and the fuel costs alone would be considerably higher. I would be willing to pay a much higher price to fly instead, because reaching Melbourne in two hours versus nine hours has significant value to me.

Price versus value in the equity markets

At any time, there can be varying degrees of pricing dislocation within the stock market. We focus on buying specific companies that might have severe pricing dislocation in favour of value based on a very bankable causality: people. People are a reliable source of pricing errors. Whether they are retail or institutional investors, they make extreme errors of judgement and assess value based on a list of hard-wired factors that trigger an irrational decision framework. Factors such as greed, fear, peer group pressure, loss aversion, short-term bias and anchoring help to create erroneous decisions. Over time, the divergence between market prices and intrinsic values will converge and pricing becomes rational.

Think about the stockmarket crash in 1987 which saw prices fall on average by more than 20%. Now the intrinsic value of companies across the world could not all have fallen by 20% in the space of 24 hours. So, either there was pricing dislocation before the crash or there was pricing dislocation after the crash. Remember the dotcom boom? When the dizzying market prices of that bubble finally corrected back to intrinsic values, the NASDAQ composite index fell by 78% in the 30 months post the then all-time high. Market prices during the bubble phase clearly did not reflect intrinsic values.

Value drivers

Intrinsic value in investing is derived from cashflows. The value of the business is assessed by discounting the free cashflow the business is expected to generate in the future. Returns above a return appropriate for risk may mean that the market value of the business might be undervalued. On the other hand, investors would have avoided a lot of pain during the dotcom boom as many companies were decades away from generating profits and hardly generated any revenues. The intrinsic valuations in those cases were close to negligible.

Is Bitcoin a bubble?

Bitcoin is based on a revolutionary technology called blockchain. Blockchain is based on a decentralised ledger system which uses nodes as opposed to a traditional single-source ledger or single source of truth, to validate and hold ledger entries. It uses these nodes to evaluate and verify a proposed transaction and if the majority of nodes concur, the new entry is added across the network of nodes. This system should improve the integrity and security of data and radically improves the speed and reduces the costs of transactions. The technology will prove to be highly valuable and change the way many large data networks function. It will make a transformative contribution to society and help achieve increased productivity, reliability, and security.

So, Bitcoin is therefore valuable? Not exactly. Bitcoin purports to do two fundamentally important things.

First, it is a digital currency and any currency whether digital or otherwise must do a few things well. It must be widely-accepted as a means of exchange, preferably as legal tender. Bitcoin is not legal tender in any main jurisdiction and some countries have actually made transacting in Bitcoin illegal. You can’t go into a car dealer and buy a car in Bitcoin, you cannot settle a property purchase in Bitcoin, and if you go into Amazon or JB Hi-Fi they will not accept Bitcoin for the purchase of goods.

Furthermore, the price volatility of Bitcoin against major currencies like the US Dollar and the Euro is so wild and erratic that even if it were widely-accepted, why would merchants want to settle business accounts in something that could quite quickly swing their customers transactions from profit to loss in a matter of minutes? There are reasons why banana republic currencies are not in high demand as a medium of exchange – they are volatile currencies. As currency or pseudo currency, Bitcoin is awful.

Second, Bitcoin purports to do is be an efficient store of value like gold. It is an interesting assertion. Bitcoin’s proponents claim that unlike gold, Bitcoin has a finite predetermined supply. Many objects have a limited supply and might be very ordinary. What is the intrinsic value of a cryptocurrency? Well it is a wonderfully engineered peer to peer ledger system that is open-sourced with a technology platform that will prove invaluable to society, but its architecture can be widely-replicated, improved, or further developed and it already has been. There are already many Bitcoin-like substitutes: Litecoin, ZCash, Dash etc. The value of Bitcoin in terms of functionality can be replicated by others, and unlike the example of the value I get from flying to Melbourne versus driving to Melbourne (the substitutive alterative), it is likely the value of future iterations of cryptocurrencies will improve upon the technological architecture and security of Bitcoin. Indeed, as blockchain adoption gains increased usage, governments may launch their own cryptocurrencies and legislate them as legal tender, immediately bestowing those currencies with a competitive advantage over Bitcoin and undermining its value.

The price has risen, not the value

Bitcoin has risen in market price by 2000% over the last 12 months, not value. Market prices and value are two very different qualities, a lesson that for many cryptocurrency investors may prove an expensive one.

 

Carlos Gil is the Chief Investment Officer of Microequities Asset Management. This article does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions.

 

  •   1 February 2018
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Platinum’s Kerr Neilson: it’s all about the price

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.