Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 245

Investors profit from demand for luxury goods

Australians may be busy paying for groceries rather than a new Ferrari, if last month’s Bureau of Statistics figures showing a strong rise in the cost of living is anything to go by, but local investors can benefit from demand for luxury goods, even if it’s not to park a Ferrari in the driveway, yet.

Some luxury goods companies have the brand equity to keep their prices high, and the business strategy to benefit from structural growth in global economies. This is aligned with Hyperion’s investment philosophy to take a bottom-up approach to invest in extreme quality companies with solid fundamentals and structural growth opportunities, and why global equities should be front of mind for Australian investors.

Why quality luxury goods stand out

Where do we see value at the moment?

One sector we particularly like is luxury goods, which continues to benefit significantly from the growth of economies like China and India, and the rise of the middle class.

However, not all luxury goods are created equal. It’s important to focus on high-quality businesses with strong growth prospects, large and growing addressable markets, low levels of gearing, and predictable medium to long-term earnings streams. Two such companies are French high-fashion house Hermes and Italian car manufacturer, Ferrari.

Both companies have been around for some time, Hermes since 1837, and Ferrari since 1947. Unlike some of their competitors, both have eschewed offshore manufacturing for home factories where they can control the quality their brands rely on.

Both companies have strong brand equity which gives more pricing power than any of their competitors. Both produce items which are considered significant status symbols, and their strategy of strictly limiting supply has seen demand for their products hold up strongly. After the GFC, Ferrari sales fell a tiny 4%, compared with other ultra-luxury cars (except Lamborghini), which fell 40% over the same period. The typical wait for a Ferrari is between 18 to 24 months, and, even after three years, a Ferrari typically retains 93% of its value and will actually increase in value after 20 years.

The power of the Ferrari brand means that its competitive position in its market is secure, its pricing power will not diminish, and its capacity to profit from a growth in demand is second to none. And, in our view, these markets remain underpenetrated, giving a lot of capacity for growth.

Hermes has a similar story and a similar business model. When President Xi Jinping began implementing anti-corruption reform in China in 2012, the crackdown on gift-giving saw a significant drop in retail sales generally, and in sales of luxury goods in particular. As a result, 2013 was a difficult year for many luxury retailers in China. Growth in sales fell from 7% in 2012 to 2% in 2013, according to a report by Bain & Co, and average spending of China’s high-net-worth individuals also decreased significantly. Yet, against this backdrop of difficult retail conditions and falling sales in luxury goods, Hermes was one of the few not affected, and was in fact able to grow sales by 16%.

The importance of looking beyond our own borders

Australian investors have long had a strong domestic bias when it comes to equity investment, and historically, quality Australian businesses have had the ability to produce growing and sustainable earnings. However, overseas markets offer a much larger universe of stocks and a greater diversity in industries to choose from. The economies in which these companies operate have higher growth potential. This means addressable markets are typically larger than those on offer in Australia (often significantly larger). In many cases, internationally-based companies offer superior economics and scale and better long-term growth pathways.

As the world economies are growing, they are also becoming more accessible to investors. Before the digital revolution and advances in technology, Australian investors were at a significant disadvantage when it came to accessing in-depth information and on-the-ground intelligence about international companies. The time difference and our physical location at the end of the world meant investors on the spot had a real advantage.

The evolution of technology changed all that. Australia’s physical location is not the barrier to investment it once was, and Australian investors now have the ability to trade and access information 24 hours a day. This doesn’t mean it’s no longer important to travel to overseas markets, and to talk to company management face-to-face, but it does mean that the ability to identify quality growth businesses both here and overseas has been enhanced.

The numerous quality-investment opportunities on offer globally are often better from a relative value perspective. With a few exceptions, global companies are of a higher quality than their Australian counterparts, and current five-year earnings forecasts are also higher – all of which, translates into stronger returns for investors with relatively lower levels of risk.

The bias towards the home market has served many well, but the opportunities on offer in the larger, more diverse economies overseas should improve the risk/return profile of any portfolio if the right stocks are chosen. International companies with large addressable markets, market dominance and consistent earnings, like luxury goods providers Hermes and Ferrari, are exceptional businesses, that can produce strong, sustainable returns to investors over the medium to long term. And it’s those fundamentals, regardless of domicile geography, that will drive investors’ wealth.

 

Mark Arnold and Jason Orthman are the Chief and Deputy Chief Investment Officers respectively at high-conviction equities manager, Hyperion Asset Management. This article does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   21 March 2018
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The role of shareholder yield in a portfolio

Two companies with clear competitive advantages.

How much will you risk to feel comfortable?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.