Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 530

Is the market wrong on AI and China?

In October 2022, a renowned analyst at one of the world’s leading investment banks published a report that downgraded the stock of Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook) and halved his price target to $105 per share. The analyst had been spooked by Meta’s guidance on the scale of its future capital investments – largely for AI. The spending was simply too much, too scary. It was 'thesis changing', the analyst said. After the analyst’s report was published, Meta’s stock crashed 24% the next day.

But fast-forward 10 months, and the market now loves AI investments, and the more the better, seemingly. From the lows reached in late 2022, Meta’s stock has nearly quadrupled.

Put simply, the market was wrong on Meta.

Here is another example. In 2020, Bed Bath & Beyond, a US big box retailer of homewares and furniture – a company that had earnings declines each year since 2013 – experienced something unusual.

Bed Bath & Beyond – Five year stock price

Source: Bloomberg

Over a 10-month period, its stock increased by 14x, adding nearly US$4 billion in value to the company. To put this in perspective, the value of the entire company – including all its indebtedness – amounted to only $3 billion at the beginning of this escapade.

Did this share price surge fairly represent the intrinsic value of the business? Or was the market simply swept up in some Covid-stimulus-related exuberance at the time? It was surely the latter. Two years later, Bed Bath & Beyond filed for bankruptcy.

The dangers and opportunities in a market that misleads

The conventional, academic view is that markets are ‘efficient’ – they price in all available information effectively and are therefore fairly valued. But as you can see in the stock stories above, the truth is that the market is often wrong: that is, stock prices can deviate from true value from time to time, and sometimes significantly. Ben Graham was certainly right to dub the stock market ‘Mr. Market’, a manic-depressive character prone to bouts of pessimism and optimism.

And that means stock prices are not reliably good at telling you whether your investment ideas are right or wrong. Shareholders of Silicon Valley Bank, for example, probably ‘felt right’ for nearly 40 years based on the continual steady rise in the bank’s stock price. But ultimately, their investment would turn out to be worthless.

So what should investors do when investing in a market that can be wildly wrong? The secret to navigating periods of market mispricing is simple, but not easy: remain focused on business fundamentals – revenues, earnings, cash flows – and how these evolve relative to prior expectations.

Investors should view a stock price as simply a window of opportunity to buy or sell. The window might be closed most of the time, but sometimes a window opens to buy a stock when its price becomes cheap – that is, the market is pricing-in the future earnings power of a business too low. Conversely, a window of opportunity may open to sell a stock, even the stock of a world-leading company, if its price becomes too expensive.

The huge rewards to holding onto Amazon when the market was wrong

With this approach, investors would view the large stock price drawdowns that Amazon has suffered throughout its history, for example, as nothing more than an opportunity to buy more shares – and not an indictment on their original investment thesis.

Amazon, one of the world’s best businesses, has arguably remained structurally undervalued by the market for most (if not all) of its corporate lifetime.

Amazon – plenty of large draw-downs

Source: Bloomberg; Montaka

Not only has Amazon’s stock halved on three occasions – the dot com bust, the GFC, and the 2022 price downturn – it has experienced a 30% decline on numerous occasions. History has always shown these drawdowns to be unreasonable.

But if an investor could have held on when the market was wrong, they would have been rewarded with an annual return of 33% for 26 years, or compound growth of 1,800x).

Is Mr. Market wrong today?

So where could the market be wrong today? Two areas are AI and China.

There is clearly a lot of hype about AI. And while the technology itself appears to be genuinely revolutionary, history shows that mercurial Mr. Market is not always as discerning as he should be in periods of great hype.

Take NVIDIA, the designer of the world’s most in-demand accelerator chips for AI today. The stock has rallied more than 3x this year alone. The stock now trades at 41x next year’s (substantially upgraded) earnings. Has the market got this valuation right? Time will tell.

Today, NVIDIA’s AI chips are essentially the only game in town. This is an extraordinarily attractive position for the company to find itself in. But the competition in the chip design space is intensifying. Most of NVIDIA’s largest customers are investing in their own competing chip designs. It would not be a complete shock to look back in a few years and conclude that today’s valuation was unreasonably elevated.

On the other end of the spectrum, Chinese equities have had a miserable time of late. A weakening economy, combined with geopolitical concerns, has led many investors to sell.

NVIDIA vs Alibaba – YTD stock returns

Source: Bloomberg; Montaka

As a result, shares in Alibaba, China’s largest e-commerce platform and cloud computing platform, are flat year-to-date (but down by two-thirds from its 2020 peak). Yet investors might be surprised to learn the following:

  • Alibaba’s revenue is growing at double-digit percentage annual rates,
  • Its employee count is down 7% compared to last year,
  • Group profit margins are expanding,
  • Free cash flow is double where it was a year ago,
  • Cash is being returned to shareholders via large buybacks (the equivalent of 1/6th of today’s enterprise value has been returned in the last two years alone), and
  • The stock now trades at just 6x next year’s earnings.

Has the market got this valuation right? Or is it being overly pessimistic?

Again, time will tell. In this instance, one needn’t dispute the risks of investing in China. Instead, it’s a question of what price for Alibaba is simply too cheap. It would not be shocking to look back in a few years and observe an Alibaba stock price that is materially higher than current levels.

Remain anchored in fundamentals, not stock prices

It’s human nature to view stock prices as a feedback mechanism – an adjudication of investments that were right and wrong. So it’s important to remember the market can mislead and is often wrong.

Instead, view stock prices as nothing more than offers to buy and sell. And divorce prices from your assessment of business fundamentals. Own businesses when your fundamental expectations greatly exceed those embedded in stock prices. And sell those when the reverse is true.

 

 

Andrew Macken is the Chief Investment Officer at Montaka Global Investments, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and is based on an understanding of current legislation.

For more articles and papers from Montaka, click here.

 

3 Comments
Frankie
October 14, 2023

I really struggle with the AI stuff (China I've written off on ageing demographics and trade barriers). I can see how Nvidia does well from it based on it chips, but it seems every company small and large is using AI so what's the barrier to entry and how does it give a competitive edge that makes money?

Economist
October 12, 2023

Um, one opinion that got a forecast wrong doesn't equate the market getting it wrong.

The market is the sum total of all opinions - those that turn out right and those that turn out wrong - and pricing at any point in time reflects those opinions. That's how the market gets it right all the time - there is never an opinion not reflected in the pricing. Presumably you are currently buying China and AI - fair enough, and your purchases are reflected in the current price. If the prices go up more than an index of the whole market into the future and you do well, bully for you. But that doesn't mean the market got anything wrong.

Philip Rix
October 19, 2023

All "market opinions" are formed on the data points that those investors chose to rely upon which are in turn acted upon subject to the human emotional biases that will have hard wired into us (confirmation bias, fear, greed etc). So to my thinking, it is therefore very plausible that the majority of opinions on a stock could actually be wrong and this in turn leads to the market pricing of a stock also being wrong. I therefore do not believe " ... the market gets it right all of the time".

 

Leave a Comment:


RELATED ARTICLES

5 exciting areas of investment opportunity

Five steps to become a better investor

Why are some companies vulnerable in 2022?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The nuts and bolts of family trusts

There are well over 800,000 family trusts in Australia, controlling more than $3 trillion of assets. Here's a guide on whether a family trust may have a place in your individual investment strategy.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 581 with weekend update

A recent industry event made me realise that a 30 year old investing trend could still have serious legs. Could it eventually pose a threat to two of Australia's biggest companies?

  • 10 October 2024

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

How have so many wealthy families through history managed to squander their fortunes? This looks at the lessons from these families and offers several solutions to making and keeping money over the long-term.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 583

Investing guru Howard Marks says he had two epiphanies while visiting Australia recently: the two major asset classes aren’t what you think they are, and one key decision matters above all else when building portfolios.

  • 24 October 2024

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

A big age gap can make it harder to find a solution that works for both partners – financially and otherwise. Having a frank conversation about the future, and having it as early as possible, is essential.

Latest Updates

Planning

What will be your legacy?

As we get older, many of us start to think about how we’ll be remembered by those left behind. This looks at why that may not be the best strategy to ensure that you live life well and leave loved ones in good stead.

Economy

It's the cost of government, stupid

Australia's bloated government sector is every bit as responsible for our economic worries as the cost of living crisis. Grand schemes like the 'Future Made in Australia' only look set to make it worse.

SMSF strategies

A guide to valuing SMSF assets correctly

SMSF trustees are required to value all fund assets, including property, at market value when preparing the fund's financial statements each year. Here are some key tips to ensure that you get it right.

Economics

Australia is lucky the British were the first 'intruders'

British colonisation's Common Law system contributed to economic prosperity, in contrast to Latin America's lower wealth under Civil Law. It influenced capitalism's success in former British colonies, like Australia.

Economics

A significant shift in the jobs market

The expansion of the 'care sector' represents the most profound structural change to Australia's job market since the mining boom. This analyses how it's come about and the impact it will have on the economy.

Shares

Searching for value in tech stocks

Just because a stock is cheap doesn't necessarily make it good value. This uses case studies in the tech sector to help identify when stocks trading on 30x earnings may be inexpensive and when others on 10x may be value traps.

Investing

Are more informed investors prone to making poorer decisions?

Finance Professor Michael Finke recently discussed the double-edged sword of taking an interest in your investments, three predictors of panic selling, and why nurses tend to be better investors than doctors.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.