Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 581

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

Planning for retirement can be a complex process, even for people with relatively simple circumstances. And let’s be honest—most people don’t have uncomplicated situations. Having a long-term partner, for example, adds complexity. If you’ve experienced a breakup and found a new partner, that brings even more layers. Add children into the mix, and things become even more intricate!

While those scenarios are challenging but common, it becomes even trickier when there’s a significant age gap between partners. These situations are less frequent, and often overlooked in retirement planning discussions.

I’ve worked with many couples where the age difference led to friction. In most of those cases, the trouble stemmed from a lack of early discussions about their personal and financial goals. It’s not just the financial aspect—both partners need to be clear about what they want out of life. One partner may be winding down their career and looking forward to the freedom that retirement brings, while the other is still deep in the throes of their career. This can lead to feelings of impatience, loneliness, or even a sense of lost opportunity if one partner feels they are sacrificing their dreams for the other. Acknowledging these emotions can make a significant difference and make figuring out the practicalities of your age difference much easier to navigate.

Key considerations for retirement planning when partners are of different ages

For couples early in a relationship who hope for long-term success, there are three key factors to consider: lifestyle, financial plans, and estate planning.

1. Lifestyle

When couples from different generations come together, they typically have shared interests that bring them closer. But are those enough to maintain a relationship over time? Do their different life stages mean their goals might eventually clash?

Having an age difference means that you might not always be on the same page, but you should at least understand the other person’s perspective. For instance, a 60-year-old might be eager to explore the country on a long caravan trip, while their 45-year-old partner is still busy with their career. These aren’t financial issues—they’re more about how each partner views life and what they want, which is equally important to address.

It's also worth considering the impact of health and energy levels. As people age, their physical capabilities naturally change. Will both partners be in a similar place physically when it comes to activities like travel, hobbies, and social engagement? What happens if one partner experiences health challenges earlier than expected? These are difficult, but necessary, conversations to have.

2. Financial planning for couples with age differences

When discussing finances, the focus doesn’t have to be on the age gap itself—it’s about how each person sees and handles money. What’s your attitude toward money? Is it simply a tool, or does it carry deeper meaning? Are you a spender while your partner prefers saving? Will you combine your finances or keep them separate?

There aren’t necessarily right or wrong answers to these questions, but they do need to be discussed. Once you’ve both clarified your views, you can develop financial strategies that work for your future together. For example, when one partner reaches the Centrelink age pension eligibility age (67), both of their income and assets are assessed for eligibility. If the younger partner is under 67, any money in their superannuation isn’t counted in that assessment. These are the kinds of nuances that make retirement planning more complicated for couples with a significant age difference. There may be some opportunities in this scenario to maximise the age pension entitlements.

It’s a smart move to consult a financial adviser early in the relationship to ensure you’ve considered all potential scenarios. In addition, it’s wise to regularly update your financial plans as circumstances change—whether that’s a shift in income, health status, or unexpected life events.

3. Estate planning

Estate planning is a critical aspect of preparing for retirement, particularly for couples with an age difference. As one partner may pass away earlier, it's essential to have a clear plan for how assets will be distributed. This is especially important if there are children from previous relationships, as it can prevent disputes and ensure that all parties are provided for. Having legal and valid will for each offers certainly for both partners, safeguarding the financial well-being of the surviving partner. Without these safeguards, the younger partner may face financial insecurity or legal challenges. Further to this, it’s important to ensure there are Power of Attorney documents set up for each. Estate planning brings peace of mind, knowing that both partners and their loved ones are protected as they approach and live in retirement. Part of your estate planning will be ensuring superannuation beneficiaries are set up, housing arrangements if there is a blended family and the home is to eventually form part of one spouse children’s inheritance but not the other spouse children.

So what do you do?

Both partners in a relationship, especially with an age gap, come into it as established individuals—no one is starting with a blank slate. Having open, early discussions to identify any major points of conflict can be incredibly helpful. And frankly, this is great advice for all couples, regardless of any age difference. I believe it all comes down to expectation alignment, from both people. Have the conversation and have it now.

 

Glen James is a former financial adviser and the creator and host of the Retire Right and money money money podcasts.

 

7 Comments
Balding
October 13, 2024

Only super in accumulation phase is exempt from asset and income test pre age 67, not super in general.

David Williams
October 11, 2024

Excellent analysis thanks Glen. This is one of the many situations longevity planning is designed to help advisers and their clients resolve. With each partner having their own longevity plan, many of the issues Glen describes are much more easily reviewed together and resolved before the complex financial decisions are addressed. Longevity planning also makes transparent all the key elements of estate planning as factors to be addressed individually then together. For financial advisers facing the 'couples challenge', individual longevity planning is the vital first step in a process that can be complex but ultimately rewarding if framed correctly at the outset. For advisers, it is also likely to ensure the next generation gets a good look at how the adviser helps their parents resolve the inevitable differences effectively and supportively. Hard to think of better PR for maintaining the relationship.

Old Geezer
October 10, 2024

Nice one Glen
Another consideration is any superannuation pension used to support the couple’s lifestyle.
The younger spouse may need the older spouse’s pension to continue their lifestyle. So a reversionary pension fixes that, perhaps.

No one seems to address what happens to the minimum withdrawal rate on death.
Does it now use the younger spouse’s age to set the minimum or use the deceased, older spouse’s age with a higher minimum?
Which minimum applies in the year of the death? For all of the year or part only?
One would think that has been asked before but my (useless) Google cannot find it

Jack
October 13, 2024

“ There is no requirement to adjust the minimum amount of the reversionary pension to the reversionary in the year of death regardless of any differences that would apply to the minimum factors that may apply to the primary pensioner and reversionary beneficiary. From 1 July the following year, the minimum pension is adjusted based on the reversionary beneficiary’s minimum pension factor.”

www.yourlifetime.com.au/news/411/what-are-the-differences-between-reversionary-and-non-reversionary-superannuation-pensions

John De Ravin
October 14, 2024

Those are good questions!
I tried to answer them with the help of my new best friend (Microsoft Copilot!!) and the answers I got were that no minimum drawdown rate applies, either to the deceased spouse or to the beneficiary of the reversionary ABP, in the financial year on which the deceased spouse passes away. However in the following financial year, the minimum drawdown rate applicable to the surviving spouse applies.
I don’t promise that these answers are correct (and AI apps are known to “hallucinate” sometimes) but the answers seem reasonable, and Copilot cited Superguide and the ATO, which are credible sources.
Sometimes us old geezers need new friends, hey?

SuperSpecialist
October 15, 2024

There are two varying situations depending on whether the pension is reversionary or if it is commenced subsequently as a (non-reversionary) death benefit pension - at least for account-based pensions.

If the pension is reversionary, in the year of reversion the minimum pension persists for the survivor as if the deceased still owned the pension. That is, the minimum is based on the deceased's age-related drawdown factors and the opening balance (usually 1 July balance) of the pension.

For simplicity, as far as minimum pensions are concerned, it's often easy to think of it as if the deceased hasn't died.

For subsequent years the minimum is based on the survivor's age/drawdown factors.

In the case of a non-reversionary death benefit pension. The liability to pay minimum pensions in the hands of the deceased stops on death - this is even the case if no minimum (or pro-rated minimum) had been taken before death.

If the survivor, then starts a new (non-reversionary) death benefit pension the minimum is pro-rated for the commencement year based on commencement date AND the drawn down rate is based on the survivor's age.

Often easy to think of these, again only as far as minimum pensions drawings are concerned, as the same as if the pension had been started from the survivor's own balance.

Mart
October 10, 2024

Nice summary Glen, thank you. In essence health and happiness are two of the key metrics as we age (yes, financial means and family / friends are hugely important too) and that first one sharply comes into focus if you are a couple wth an age gap. You also, as a couple, need to work out what you do with that precious and dwindling asset - your time. Given all that I think your concluding paragraph is especially apt ... talk about this stuff and make sure your views and requirements are in sync as much as they can be. As per the great maths formula: happiness is reality divided by expectations. Or as it says in the Bible: "blessed is he who expects nothing, for he shall never be disappointed" (Firstlinkius 39:10)....

 

Leave a Comment:


RELATED ARTICLES

Let's ditch the idea of retirement

Retiring young: Is 50 really the new 65?

Investment bonds should be considered for retirement planning

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

An important Foxtel announcement...

News Corp's plans to sell Foxtel are surprising in that streaming assets Kayo, Binge and Hubbl look likely to go with it. This and recent events in the US show the bind that legacy TV businesses find themselves in.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 581 with weekend update

A recent industry event made me realise that a 30 year old investing trend could still have serious legs. Could it eventually pose a threat to two of Australia's biggest companies?

  • 10 October 2024

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

A big age gap can make it harder to find a solution that works for both partners – financially and otherwise. Having a frank conversation about the future, and having it as early as possible, is essential.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 578 with weekend update

The number of high-net-worth individuals in Australia has increased by almost 9% over the past year, and they now own $3.3 trillion in investable assets. A new report reveals how the wealthy are investing their money.

  • 19 September 2024

The everything rally brings danger and opportunity

Most market players today seek quick rewards and validation of opinion. Outsiders willing to combine new technology with old-fashioned patience and focused analysis can prosper.

The challenges of building a portfolio from scratch

It surprises me how often individual investors and even seasoned financial professionals don’t know the basics of building an investment portfolio. Here is a guide to do just that, as well as the challenges involved.

Latest Updates

Retirement

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

A big age gap can make it harder to find a solution that works for both partners – financially and otherwise. Having a frank conversation about the future, and having it as early as possible, is essential.

The everything rally brings danger and opportunity

Most market players today seek quick rewards and validation of opinion. Outsiders willing to combine new technology with old-fashioned patience and focused analysis can prosper.

Investment strategies

Portfolio construction in the real world

Building a portfolio is like building a house. This framework can help you move towards your goals without losing sight of reality or leaving yourself vulnerable to market storms.

Shares

Feel the fear and buy anyway

In this extract from his new book, the co-founder of Intelligent Investor reveals how investors can avoid critical mistakes and profit from opportunities in collapsing share prices.

Investment strategies

The risks of market concentration and not staying invested

MFS chief investment officer and CEO elect Ted Maloney talks market risks, similarities between Trump and Harris, and the most important thing investors can do to avoid destroying value.

Gold

Gold's important role as geopolitical tensions rise

Equity markets have traditionally struggled at times of sustained geopoltical tension. Gold, on the other hand, has thrived and can provide investors with protection against "unknown unknowns".

Strategy

The changing face of finals footy and the numbers behind it

A well-meaning AFL rule change in 2016 seems to have had unintended consequences. The top teams might cry foul but AFL bosses are unlikely to be too miffed about the outcome.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.