Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 224

Are there opportunities for an active manager in an efficient market?

We view the Australian stockmarket as highly efficient. There are a large number of domestic research analysts, brokers, fund managers and investment professionals poring over the listed securities. In such an environment it is difficult, if not impossible, to regularly be smarter than the other informed market participants.

How does an individual stock picker outperform over long periods of time? Why would such a market present outstanding individual risk-adjusted opportunities for investors? It is a good question to ask if you are invested with an active manager. It has been a key question for researchers for a long time. Professor Eugene Fama’s Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) proposed that it is impossible to beat the performance of a liquid stockmarket over time because prices constantly incorporate and reflect all relevant information.

Opportunities come from cognitive biases

If we find a stock that we think is compellingly cheap, one of the first questions we ask is why we are getting the opportunity. What circumstances have led to the mispricing? What are people reacting to in order for the stock price to have deviated so far from our perception of fair value? The absence of a logical answer might infer a problem with the analysis, rather than an opportunity for an attractive purchase. The collective market is almost always more informed than the individual investor, assuming the investor is an outsider to the company under consideration.

We think we find opportunities for one predominant reason. Market participants have cognitive biases that lead to emotional rather than rational responses to new or changing circumstances. We are no different. We feel the same emotional responses. Our role is to invest as rationally as possible. We focus attention on the facts and try to remove the influence of the emotional response from our thinking.

Good investments typically come in one of three forms. The first is at the stock level. A company has a temporary setback or earnings revision and the market extrapolates the problem across the entire business. We focus on the medium-term outlook and ask whether we can make sensible, modest forecasts about earnings over the following few years. If earnings are delivered as expected, would this make buying at the current stock price attractive? A favourable answer means there’s a time horizon arbitrage in a company we would like to own for a long time.

Secondly, sometimes a whole sector might screen as attractively priced because the market is focused on a threat that appears overblown. An example is shown in the chart below.

In May 2014, the Federal Government proposed a restrictive and somewhat unpopular budget to assist in repairing the budget deficit. Over the following six months, the market sold retail stocks that many assumed would be significantly impacted by any cut to disposable income. The likely numerical impact of any budget measures on consumer discretionary spend was, on our analysis, likely to be small and transitory in nature. It gave an attractive entry point into a number of high quality retailers that we had been watching for some time.

Thirdly, there may be a market-wide reaction to a particular event, such as the surprise election of Donald Trump or UK’s Brexit vote. Participants in the domestic market reacted to Brexit by selling financial stocks in the weeks that followed. We believed the risks to corporate earnings were relatively low. Similarly, it was unclear why the election of President Trump would negatively impact the earnings of Australian companies, yet at one point in the afternoon of the election the domestic stockmarket was down nearly 4% (as highlighted below). Many individual stocks were down considerably, having already fallen on the uncertainty heading into the election.

Need to be patient for these opportunities

Outstanding opportunities do not come along frequently, and certainly not predictably. In the intervening periods, investors should be as patient as possible, remaining focused on their existing portfolio and ready to respond rationally. There may be an opportunity to invest sensibly in familiar companies with quality attributes.

We agree with the notion that the market is most often efficient, but that the difference between ‘often’ and ‘always’ is like night and day. Opportunities for the value investor occur when the majority of market participants are distracted from the immediate opportunity by an issue where the impact is either exaggerated or transitory. This is when we become most interested and plan to take full advantage for the long-term.

 

Tim Carleton is Principal and Portfolio Manager at Auscap Asset Management, a boutique Australian equities long/short investment manager. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual. A person should obtain the Product Disclosure Statement before deciding whether to acquire, or to continue to hold, units in any Auscap fund.

 

  •   25 October 2017
  • 3
  •      
  •   
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.