Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Actively navigating economic and geopolitical shocks

Michael J. Stephen Dover, CFA, Chief Market Strategist, Franklin Templeton Investment Institute

with Gene Podkaminer, CFA, Head of Research, Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions

Introduction

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has caused broad destruction and terrible turmoil on a humanitarian level. This has led to a series of shocks to the global economy and political order. At the Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, we seek to identify how these shocks might have persistent and significant impacts on the global economy, capital markets and long-term investment returns.

  • Russia’s invasion of Ukraine does not signal the end of globalization. We anticipate shifting sources of production and investment flows will result from today’s economic dislocations. Worldwide, countries will need to reconsider energy and food security risks. Trade and investment flows will shift, and how countries cope will have a large impact on future economic growth, the distribution of income, after-tax returns, inflation, interest rates, and political and financial stability in countries large and small. The implication is not de-globalization as much as it is re-globalization.
  • Global growth expectations are being reset downwards as uncertainty is permeating through businesses and consumers. While Western Europe’s proximity to the war puts it at greatest risk of stagflation, we do not expect conditions anywhere else in the world will trigger a combination of enduring stagnation and inflation.
  • Inflation remains elevated and is likely to be pushed higher by surging global energy and commodity prices due to war, sanctions and the threat of supply disruptions. Supply-led inflation is particularly concerning when it comes with an energy shock. Energy is used in many facets of the global economy from production through consumption. However, energy does not hit every sector equally. Will companies react quickly to inflation, and will they be able to pass on costs to consumers? Which countries might pick up the slack in commodity production?
  • For investors who’ve known nothing except low and stable inflation, this is a new world that creates volatility due to uncertainty. If one could make the case for active management, we think now would be the time. Heightened market correlations make achieving excess returns more challenging, and a wider dispersion of returns provides an opportunity for active managers to pick up alpha (above-market returns).

We will be monitoring the aforementioned factors closely as the year unfolds and wish peace to the people of Ukraine.

Download the full report

  •   28 April 2022
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.