Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 37

The black box of general insurance

Insurance companies have a reputation for being ‘black boxes’ when it comes to their earnings. The reported profit that any insurer can make is largely an accounting construct; that is, actuaries are required to estimate the profile of claims that policy holders are expected to make in the future. Insurers also use rather unique terminology in their financial statements, and the combination of these two factors may deter investors from considering insurers as viable investment opportunities.

Insurance companies can generally be divided up into two main business flows: underwriting, which is the practice of writing and collecting premiums on insurance policies, and paying claims on some of the policies; and the investment of those premiums – also known as the ‘float’ or reserves.

Underwriting is relatively easy to understand if you think about it from your own perspective. You pay an insurance company money to cover you for the risk of something undesirable befalling you. The amount you pay to the insurance company is the premium, which is usually invoiced annually.

Thousands of customers pay premiums, but not all of them will make a claim on their policies. Insurers attempt to make a profit from collecting and aggregating premiums, paying commissions and expenses for marketing, and then paying a portion out in claims.

If an insurer makes a loss on its underwriting division (that is, when the claims ratio plus the expense ratio exceeds 100%), it is still possible for it to make a profit after the investment of its float. Because these reserves are intended to reimburse policy holders soon after they make an authentic claim, insurers must hold them in assets that provide minimal risk, such as fixed income or short-term cash deposits. Insurers also have shareholders’ funds at their disposal, which they usually invest in riskier asset classes such as equities.

You can get a sense of how these main drivers are inextricably linked; an insurer must have a keen awareness of the risk profiles of its policy holders to price its policies correctly. There is an art (and a fair bit of luck) in pricing premiums, and sustainably growing the customer base while also earning a profitable margin.  And overlaying this is the fact that like seats on a plane, the insurer is generally selling a commodity.  And then there are black swan events – those that even the best actuarial mathematicians cannot predict. For example, many commentators are predicting that climate change may intensify the frequency and cost of weather related events.

Insurers also have to contend with fraudulent claims, those that end up in court and take years to resolve and produce unknowable cost profiles, and at times, irrational pricing by competitors.  It is interesting to note the major Australian retailers, Coles and Woolworths, are following the lead of their British peers in using risk related information from their considerable customer databases to actively promote car and home insurance.

Finally, changing interest rates affect both the discount rates used to estimate future claims and the expected return generated by insurers’ reserves.  Central banks around the world have dramatically cut short-term interest rates in an effort to stimulate their respective home economies.  However, with green economic shoots starting to emerge, the focus has now turned to reducing this quantitative easing, and the yield for long-dated bonds has gradually increased since mid-2012.  Some analysts argue that higher long term interest rates may be positive for insurers with a short duration portfolio, or a short claim cycle. Higher rates will also increase the discount rate actuaries use to assess claims profiles, and in turn this should have a positive impact on underwriting profits.

(Prior to its collapse in 2001, HIH Insurance was one of Australia’s largest general insurance companies.  Readers interested in the inner workings of this general insurer as well as a chronicle of arrogance, ignorance and self-delusion should read the 2005 book Other People’s Money, by the journalist, Andrew Main).

Obscure terminology and the challenges posed by climate change, black swan events and fraudulent claims make many investors wary of looking on insurance companies as viable investments, even though insurers themselves hold their reserves in minimal risk assets. Indeed, they are difficult to analyse and subject to more unexpected external forces than most companies. Just as running an insurance company is part science and part art, there’s a fair bit of luck involved in making a good investment decision in one of them.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller, ‘Value.able’. Within the Australian general insurance sector, The Montgomery Fund owns QBE Insurance Group.

 

  •   25 October 2013
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

What do fund managers mean by Quality Investing?

The ultimate investing hack: dividend growth stocks

The ASX's 16-year drought: a rebuttal

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.