Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 92

‘Tis the season, and aged care may be on the wish list

This article is the final in our 3 part series on the different ways people receive aged care in Australia and the timing is just right. For many people, amongst the stress of cooking, buying presents and visiting family and friends, this Christmas will be the worry of finding aged care in the new year for a loved one.

Many of us firmly announce that we have no intention of moving into an aged care facility: “An old people’s home? Not me!” More than one-third of men and one-half of women who reach the age of 65 are expected at some time to live in aged care. And often, when they take the time to investigate their options, they are pleasantly surprised.

Aged care accommodation costs

Significant reforms to the aged care industry occurred on 1 July 2014. These reforms changed the amount and way in which people can pay for their accommodation and the means testing arrangements for calculating their cost of care.

Let’s start with accommodation payments. Apologies for the jargon and abbreviations but anyone looking for aged care solutions has to get their head around them.

Aged care facilities publish the market price of their accommodation on their websites, in their marketing materials and on the government’s My Aged Care website. The published price takes two forms: the lump sum amount (known as a Refundable Accommodation Deposit or RAD) and the daily charge amount (known as a Daily Accommodation Payment or DAP). The resident can choose to pay for their cost of accommodation by RAD or DAP or in combination. This includes the ability to have the DAP deducted from the RAD. The DAP is simply calculated on the unpaid RAD amount at 6.63%.

For example, the facility may have a market price of $400,000 RAD or $72.66 per day DAP but the resident may choose to pay a combination of $250,000 by RAD and $27.25 per day by DAP. A resident can also choose to have their DAP deducted from their RAD. Where this is the case a recalculation occurs at the end of each month for a new DAP amount. Essentially it is a compound interest effect to cover the shortfall, not unlike a reverse mortgage. Aged care facilities set their own price up to $550,000, beyond this the price needs to be approved by the Aged Care Pricing Commissioner.

Contributing to the cost of care

When it comes to making a contribution towards your cost of care, there are three payments.

The first is paid by everyone and is known as the Basic Daily Fee. It is set at 85% of the Age Pension, currently $47.15 per day and contributes towards the cost of meals, laundry, utilities etc.

The second is the Means Tested Care Fee. This is an asset and income assessed fee, with the amount the resident contributes offsetting the government funding. For example, if a resident had a means tested care fee of $40 per day and the facility was due to receive $70 per day of funding for the resident, the facility would receive $30 per day from the government and a letter advising that the resident can afford to pay the other $40 as a means tested care fee.

The formula for determining the means tested care fee is:

50c per dollar of income above $25,118.60 (Single) $24,650.60 each (Couple) plus
17.5% of assets between $45,500 - $155,823.20 plus
1% of assets between $155,823.20 - $376,469.60 plus
2% of assets above $376,469.60
Minus $53.04 per day

What is considered assets and income?

Income is the same assessment as for pension; deeming on financial assets, taxable income on trusts and investment properties etc plus pension entitlement (note the pension supplement is not included)

Assets are the assessable assets for pension; bank accounts, car, contents, investment property etc plus up to $155,823.20 of the former home plus any amount paid to the aged care facility as a Refundable Accommodation Deposit (RAD)

The former home is exempt if a protected person is living there. A protected person is a spouse or dependent child or in other circumstances a carer or close relative.

Where the resident’s means tested amount is less than $53.04 per day they are classified as a ‘low means’ resident and the calculated amount is their Daily Accommodation Contribution. You can read more about Low Means Residents in our article here.

The third fee is the ‘extra service’ or ‘additional service’ fee. These fees relate to a higher standard of accommodation and lifestyle services or services that are being provided on a user pays basis.

For example, a resident who moves to an extra service bed, paying $15 per day as an extra service fee, will be receiving a higher standard of accommodation and also receives a choice of meals and a glass of beer or wine with dinner. The extra service fee ranges from around $15 per day to $140 per day and the standard of accommodation and services is commensurate with the price. Residents who choose to live in extra service accommodation cannot opt out of the extra service fee even if they no longer use some or all of the lifestyle services.

Additional services, on the other hand, are not linked to a higher standard of accommodation, they are simply lifestyle services provided on a user pays basis. For example, a resident may choose to receive the newspaper and a glass of wine with dinner and be charged $12 per day. If the resident no longer wishes to receive the services they can opt out, likewise, if they wish to receive more services they can opt in.

It’s not simple but it’s supposed to offer choice

People now have greater choice about the type of care they access and the way in which they pay for it. However, with choice comes the responsibility to make informed decisions. The way in which someone chooses to fund their care can have far-reaching implications from the cost of care itself, their eligibility for pension, their liability for tax, their ability to afford care in the longer term and the assets left to their estate. There is no substitute for specialist advice in this complex area.

 

 

Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus and oversees a national network of financial advisers dedicated to providing quality advice to older Australians and their families. Read more about aged care facilities in the book “Aged Care, Who Cares; Where, How and How Much” by Rachel Lane and Noel Whittaker. This article is for general educational purposes and does not address anyone’s specific needs.

 

  •   12 December 2014
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Aged care reforms: are the changes fair?

We need hard conversations about frailty planning

Why the poor will pay more for aged care next year

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.