Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 580

Are we reaching the end of Transurban's gravy train?

Transurban (ASX: TCL) was one of Australia’s great corporate success stories – until it was hit by a triple-whammy of Covid lockdowns, inflation, and public/political backlashes.

Do the new CEO and chairperson have the political cunning and connections to revive Transurban’s once-golden yellow brick road?

Here’s my take on Transurban for long-term investment.

Golden start

From an initial value of $500 million when formed and floated in 1996, TCL’s market value grew 100-fold to $50 billion by 2019 (pre-Covid), putting it into the top-10 list of largest ASX stocks, and making it the world’s largest ‘infrastructure’ stock. It was a volatile ride due to high levels of debt but returns beat the overall market handsomely.

But that golden ride ended nearly five years ago. Since its pre-Covid peak, TCL has lagged the market badly. The post-Covid ‘work from home’ revolution has reduced traffic volumes, inflation has raised the costs of road tolls for drivers, eaten into consumer spending, and increased interest rates on the company’s heavy debt load.

In addition, the company now faces a crisis that strikes at the core of its recipe for success – monopoly power and political favours.


Click for larger image

Secret sauce

Throughout history, most corporate success stories were the result of the extraordinary drive and ambition of a visionary entrepreneur, but the initial founder-driven momentum rarely continued after the founder’s departure.

TCL was different – the ‘big idea’ was not a new technology or product. The big idea was that cash-strapped governments could outsource the construction and operation of roads and tunnels to commercial companies and allow them to charge tolls, and the governments would support the venture by providing political favours in a variety of forms including deliberately routing traffic to the toll-roads, and promising protection from competition. TCL led this new trend in Australia and has dominated ever since.

Some of these ‘Public-Private Partnerships’ have been successful, but others have been financial disasters – and TCL has been smart enough to pick up some of the failures at bargain prices.

Monopoly

Every business owner’s dream is to have a monopoly in its chosen market. Monopolies can exploit ‘pricing power’ – the ability to raise prices where customers have little or no alternatives, allowing the business to extract out-sized profits. As road tolls are generally set by governments and restricted by inflation, TCL’s growth has come mainly from acquisitions of additional roads, plus extensions and expansions of roads it already owned.

Avoiding the ‘four horsemen’ of doom

In Australia, corporate success has generally not been about coming up with a brilliant world-beating idea. For Australian companies, survival and success has mostly been about avoiding the ‘four horsemen of the apocalypse’ – avoiding the four ‘dumb things’ that blow up most companies: rapid growth, aggressive international expansion, excessive debt, and ego/hubris.

1. Growth – modest and careful

On the growth front, Transurban has stuck to its core business – toll roads, and it has eliminated competition by running an almost complete monopoly on toll roads in the three largest cities in Australia – Melbourne, Sydney, and Brisbane.

Because of this monopoly, it has not had to deal with competition, which is usually the big risk to profitability with rapid expansion. It has even been able to extract extraordinary favourable deals from governments – including the right to tax-payer-funded compensation if new competing roads are built. In what other industry go you get that?!

2. International expansion

The second big risk – international expansion – has been well controlled. TCL has resisted the usual temptation to expand rapidly into foreign markets. It expanded into Washington (USA) in 2007 and into Quebec (Canada) in 2018, but these were relatively small, careful steps. These together make up just 10% of revenues and profits, leaving plenty of room for careful and selective expansion in future.

3. Debt

The third big destroyer of companies is debt – and this is where TCL has been running closest to the edge. Although the tolls are regulated by governments, the volume of road traffic is highly cyclical. High levels of debt dramatically increase the volatility of profitability – rising during economic booms but declining in slow-downs.

The 2020 covid lockdowns virtually emptied roads instantly in Australia and around the world, and TCL was hit hard.

The company has always carried high levels of debt. It was formed initially to build and operate Melbourne’s CityLink motorway. The total cost of $1.8 billion was financed by $455 million in capital raised from the public in the 1996 float, plus $1.3 billion in debt. This was a debt/equity ratio of 2.8 (72% leverage ratio), which is very high.

The bottom-right chart shows the level of TCL’s equity and debt each year. Around 70% to 80% of the asset values have been financed by debt. The big jumps in asset values from the major acquisitions are accompanied by large jumps in debt levels. The problem is that asset values are reliant on rubbery assumptions like estimates of future revenues and subjective discount rates, but debt is debt, and harder to fudge.

Continually high debt ratios have allowed TCL to grow without overly diluting shareholders, but it has meant frequent accounting losses and a volatile share price.

4. Ego

On the ‘fourth horseman’- ego and hubris, TCL has managed the roles of CEOs and Chairperson well - with stability and technical expertise rather than aggressive, ego-driven expansionists. More on this below.

Profitability and pricing

TCL rarely posts accounting profits, and its free cash flows are also mostly negative, thanks to large outgoings for maintenance, capex, expansions, and acquisitions (tip: never accept published ‘free cash flows’ numbers at face value). Returns on equity have been low single digits, averaging around zero.

Despite big swings in profitability, the company was able to maintain rising distributions in the boom years 2002-8, but distributions were cut savagely in the GFC, rose steadily in from 2009-19, only to be cut savagely again in the 2020-1 Covid lockdown crisis.

Distributions (2024) per share are finally back up to where they were sixteen years ago (2008) – and that’s before inflation. Between 2008 and 2024, inflation has reduced the real purchasing power of distributions by one third.

It's a case of the 'Telstra disease' - shareholders cling on to the illusion of 'stable dividends' but forget that they are losing real purchasing power after inflation, big time.

Price/earnings ratios have been either astronomically high or non-existent, due to frequent losses and minimal profits. Likewise for pricing to free cash flows.

On the other hand, distribution yields for TCL have been more or less similar to broad market dividend yields since around 2010. This is on the rich (expensive) side given TCL’s very low profits and returns on equity, high debt load, cyclicality of revenues, regulatory risks, and little/patchy franking.

CEOs competent technocrats

The CEOs have all been career employee professionals, not visionary entrepreneurs. Founding CEO, Kim Edwards (1996-2008), was a Melbourne engineer with deep local and international experience running big construction projects including ports, offices and hotels. He was the driving force behind the company’s success in Melbourne, then Sydney, and then in the US.

After developing world-first E-tag technology for the Washington toll roads, he did not fall into the usual trap of aggressively trying to blanket the world in a mad rush. (Are you listening Domino’s, Xero, Appen?)

When Edwards retired as CEO, he was followed by Chris Lynch (2008-12) – ex-BHP CFO, and Alcoa. Given the timing of his reign, his top priority was debt management in the GFC. Next came Scott Charlton from 2012, after a long career with construction giants LendLease and Leighton.

In late 2023, Charlton handed over the CEO role to his CFO Michelle Jablko, who was previously ex-ANZ CFO, and originally a lawyer at Allens. Unlike past CEOs, the new CEO has no hands-on experience in construction or engineering, nor in companies involving construction and management of huge engineering projects. One would have thought this would be a mandatory requirement for a CEO. Strange call.

Chair

TCLs’ chairpersons have been solid, stable, unexciting, but mostly highly competent and well connected. Political connections and clout are the key. The skill set needed here includes securing political favours and dealing with capital markets on both the debt and equity side, as the acquisitions and road extensions and expansions have been financed by combinations of debt and capital raisings, and negotiating political favours.

First in the chair was Laurie Cox (1996-2007) – former chairman of the ASX, long-time Potter Warburg broker, and supremely connected with governments of all flavours. He was followed by former banker David Ryan (2007-10), and then Lindsay Maxsted (2010 to 2022) – career KPMG partner/CEO (Maxted also chaired Westpac until he was unceremoniously booted out over the disastrous Hayne Royal Commission findings against Westpac).

Maxted was replaced with rookie chairperson Craig Drummond - ex-CEO of Medibank, after a career with NAB, Bank of America, and JB Were. The combination of relatively new, relatively inexperienced CEO and chairperson is a real issue.

Is the game up?

The game (milking monopoly power based on political favours) might be up for Transurban. You can only push monopoly power so far before it triggers a backlash from the public, and therefore populist politicians.

(As an aside - we have a holiday house in the Blue Mountains outside Sydney. A two-way trip up there costs about $30 in petrol and another $30 in TCL road tolls – Ouch! However, I feel for ordinary folk who pay $50-100 or more per week in road tolls just to get to work and back! I have a niece who is an aged/disability care worker who has to travel all over Sydney as part of her job. Road tolls are her second largest expense after rent. Sydney is the most tolled city in the world, and it was only a matter of time before we saw a widespread backlash from hundreds of thousands of ordinary workers who simply cannot afford the cost of the tolls.)

In December 2023, a controversy erupted over secret deals for preferential access to lanes on Sydney’s Anzac Bridge favouring Transurban when the NSW government’s new WestConnex tunnel system opened, causing traffic chaos and anger across Sydney’s inner west. It was just the most recent in a long line of scandals highlighting political favours that included closing and/or redirecting perfectly good lanes on public roads to push traffic into TCL toll roads.

In July 2024, a report by powerful former national competition regulator Allan Fells detailed inequities in Transurban’s monopoly pricing, and recommended a raft of radical changes including wholesale renegotiation of tolls, a new regulator, toll caps, and a range of other interventionist measures.

This is probably not something that will disappear quickly, as it is consistent with the new global populist trend toward government intervention, re-regulation, and re-distribution of wealth and power from capital back to labour.

The new CEO and Chair may be very competent and able in their respective fields in their past careers, but neither have experience in building and/or running major engineering projects, nor in political rent-seeking and clandestine deal-making, nor overcoming public / populist backlashes.

Do they have political cunning and connections to revive Transurban’s once-golden yellow brick road?

You decide!

NB - I have been a shareholder in TCL over the years, but not at present. Readers should not read anything into my current or past holdings as they may not have the same financial goals, needs, or circumstances as I had or have. As always, my analysis is fact-based and intended to be as dispassionate as possible, regardless of whether or not I am a buyer, a seller, or holder. This quick, initial snapshot is no substitute for more detailed research required before making any investment decisions.

 

Ashley Owen, CFA is Founder and Principal of OwenAnalytics. Ashley is a well-known Australian market commentator with over 40 years’ experience. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual. You can subscribe to OwenAnalytics Newsletter here. Original article is here: Transurban – end of the gravy train for monopoly toll road powerhouse?.

 

14 Comments
John Abernethy
October 06, 2024

In my opinion the two of the biggest issues for toll road operators and investors are these:

1. The toll road concessions/contract generally have requirement to transfer ownership back to the government ( the people) for zero. The terminal value of these assets is therefore nil. From a management perspective the objective is to extend the concession on any basis. Government negotiators who have extended the concessions have arguably not extracted enough consideration for doing so; and
2. The fixed indexing of toll roads - Sydney tolls rise by 1% per quarter - has created an appalling burden for road users that have resulted in rebates paid by tax payers.

Toll roads will become increasingly unaffordable for drivers on low incomes and/or small business operators. It will also become a ridiculous burden for state governments forced to make greater compensation payments to gather votes.

On reflection the building of roads by private operators was poorly planned and negotiated.

It will therefore be interesting to watch the “great renegotiation” take place as concessions run out and fixed rate indexing drive tolls to ridiculous levels. I predict this will happen in about 10 years time when non of the current management, boards or bureaucrats will be around. Another mess - like housing affordability- for future generations to fix.


michael walmsley
October 06, 2024

Thanks Ashley
Really appreciate the huge amount of work you put into this

I encourage you to release more of this type of stuff

I like the idea that you call it as you see it and dont go with the flow

Thanks for sharing !!

Michael



ashley owen
October 09, 2024

Thanks Michael - thanks for the great feedback! Please check out my web site for more (owenalaytics.com.au) - Its not monetised in any way - and certainly NO hot stock tips or fads! Just fact-based analysis.
cheers, ao

Angus
October 06, 2024

If there is too much public uproar about tolls charged by TCL why don't the relevant state governments borrow the funds needed and buy TCL, and then reduce tolls to a politically acceptable level? The maturity terms of the borrowings would need to be consistent with the lower toll revenue.

Trevor
October 06, 2024

But the government would have to raise taxes to service the debt. Who will they hit? Stamp duty? Land tax? Petrol tax? Death tax?

Toll roads are good because the person using the road pays for the road.

Capitalism instead of socialism.

Rudi
October 05, 2024

A couple points. The Victorian government underground railway cost estimate has just blown out from $50b to $200b, and counting. The design and construction cost contract for city link was $1.7b. That’s 17km of tollways—tunnels, elevated expressways, bolte bridge and the world’s first free flow vehicle tolling system. Built on time and largely to budget despite big difficulties tunnelling in Melbourne and big disputes including subcontractor issues.

Who believes government could have delivered this?

It was actually mostly Kim Edwards and supported by Laurie cox, and some others.

Agree with a lot in the interesting article. But to value transurban as an investment you need to factor in upcoming opening of Westgate tunnel project and extensions to Melbourne city link concession

ashley owen
October 06, 2024

Governments can and have done great jobs building things on occasion. In WW2 Australia (mainly BHP, but under government control) built huge numbers of ships, planes, trucks, within months of starting out. Post-war there was Snow Hydro 1 (LendLease for the Gov). But it requires genuine vision, competence, skill, talent, determination and real shared urgency that transcends politics and election cycles. We don't see much of that - in Victoria or other states or CWG. For $200b they could tunnel to China! Maybe that's the plan, as China and other foreign creditors will be funding it. It might be a secret Chinese Belt & Road deal. We know Dan Andrews was smacked down when he tried that overtly.
cheers

Darmah
October 04, 2024

Toll roads are taxation by stealth, just like “Streaming”

Toll Road M
October 03, 2024

Great observations JohnS.
What gets lost in all this is that most of our State Governments have borrowed so much that building a necessary road is seen as more borrowing.

If a company build it, it is not the State borrowing the fund. But the money will not be spent by the private sector without a return - usually the tolls.

The flaw in this system is that the users of the road pay and those who do not but who benefit from existing and future roads with fewer cars on them (because they are on the toll way do not pay.

The tolls have to be estimated based on estimated traffic numbers and these have been spectacularly inaccurate in some toll roads in Brisbane. Because of the estimation risks, the tolls are higher and the franchise period is longer to be sure to recoup the build costs and make a return.

A better system is for there to be no explicit toll, but the State pays an agreed toll. In that way the early years can have a State guaranteed income to remove the initial and ramp up risks and once the road reaches a mature state, the State can pay based on actual use. As the user does not pay directly, the inequality of benefits from users and non users is removed. The choices are as for existing road configurations today.

Campbell Dawson
October 03, 2024

Suspect the allocation of depreciation tax deductions also has a role. If NSW state owns it, NSW does not benefit from the depreciation deductions. It's worth more in private hands as the federal ATO deductions defer taxes . Good for the DCF

Bill
October 03, 2024

I think you are right. But all that ultimately results in is that the citizens pay albeit thru another method

Johns
October 03, 2024

Sounds like creative accounting to me. State governments setting up a scheme so that private businesses can get tax deductions that the federal government pays. Effectively getting more money for the state involved at the e,senses of other states.

But wait, Australians are paying for it

As I said creative accounting costing us more that if the state government had just borrowed the money in the first place and owned it

JohnS
October 03, 2024

For a long time, I have tried to figure out why governments would enter into Public/Private partnerships like the one with Transburan. And I have also tried to work out how the private ownership thinks differently to government ownership.

First observation - private toll roads take a lot less longer to build that government roads. Why? Because private companies know that they don't start making profits until they start charging tolls, and to charge tolls, you have to complete the road. Governments however get re-elected if the public see them spending money (and the longer it takes to spend the money, the longer they get re-elected). Could you imagine if the government spent all their money building a single toll road in one electorate, and then not spend any money in that electorate for 20 years? (ie the electorate got their money, and now it is someone else's turn) - the answer would be obvious, that candidate would not get re-elected. So governments are motivated to spread the money around, and to take their time spending it. Private businesses want to spend it quickly and start getting the return (government's returns are not tolls or income, but lower road tolls for example by better safety)

And there is the second reason for governments taking longer - the journalists only look at the bottom line "deficit" in the government's budget. If they "go in the red" then the government is incompetent. If they
borrow money" the government is bad. so don't spend, and the public think you are doing a good job (until things get too bad, and the public changes their mind and wants it fixed)

And the third reason? Well if government built the road, and then charged a toll to use it, the public would say "we have already paid our taxes, why do we now have to pay a toll to use the road?" - great question. But if private businesses build the road and charges a toll, well the public just says "well they did spend the money, they deserve some return, so we will pay the toll"

Final observation, is very fundamental. Who will borrow money at the lowest interest rate? Government or private enterprise? Obviously government because there is no risk of default (the government can't default on borrowings, whereas any business can). Therefore, the lender will always charge a higher interest rate to private businesses than to governments

The only possible savings are from "tax querks", where effectively one government is forced to subsidize another level of government because of the existing of the private business (and that doesn't really count, because the government at various levels are just an imagination, the government is the people) and the second possibility is that private businesses are more efficient than government. And that is just an admission of incompetence on the part of the government, and we (the public) should insist on the government operating efficiently

ashley owen
October 05, 2024

Excellent points John S. I would still trust companies more than governments to build anything - especially one with commercial payoff in revenues for usage eg tolls.
But I suspect TCL may come under pressure from govs to renegotiate tolls, of even breakup the company - not that this would add to competition.
Just a reminder - governments default on debts all over the place. NSW defaulted on its gov debt pile that financed the Sydney Harbour Bridge + electric train network. The Commonwealth defaulted on its entire stock of domestic bonds in 1931 - had to do a Greek-style haircut restructure. etc, etc.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

Avoiding wealth transfer pitfalls

Australia is in the early throes of an intergenerational wealth transfer worth an estimated $3.5 trillion. Here's a case study highlighting some of the challenges with transferring wealth between generations.

Taxpayers betrayed by Future Fund debacle

The Future Fund's original purpose was to meet the unfunded liabilities of Commonwealth defined benefit schemes. These liabilities have ballooned to an estimated $290 billion and taxpayers continue to be treated like fools.

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

Looking beyond banks for dividend income

The Big Four banks have had an extraordinary run and it’s left income investors with a conundrum: to stick with them even though they now offer relatively low dividend yields and limited growth prospects or to look elsewhere.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

Investment strategies

Time to announce the X-factor for 2024

What is the X-factor - the largely unexpected influence that wasn’t thought about when the year began but came from left field to have powerful effects on investment returns - for 2024? It's time to select the winner.

Shares

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

It’s halfway through the 2020s decade and time to get a scorecheck on the Australian stock market. The picture isn't pretty as Aussie shares are having a below-average decade so far, though history shows that all is not lost.

Shares

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Four years ago, we introduced our 'bubbles' chart to show how the market had become concentrated in one type of stock and one view of the future. This looks at what, if anything, has changed, and what it means for investors.

Shares

Is Medibank Private a bargain?

Regulatory tensions have weighed on Medibank's share price though it's unlikely that the government will step in and prop up private hospitals. This creates an opportunity to invest in Australia’s largest health insurer.

Shares

Negative correlations, positive allocations

A nascent theme today is that the inverse correlation between bonds and stocks has returned as inflation and economic growth moderate. This broadens the potential for risk-adjusted returns in multi-asset portfolios.

Retirement

The secret to a good retirement

An Australian anthropologist studying Japanese seniors has come to a counter-intuitive conclusion to what makes for a great retirement: she suggests the seeds may be found in how we approach our working years.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.