Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 262

Cuffelinks Newsletter Edition 262

  •   13 July 2018
  •      
  •   

There are many theories about why most active fund managers fail to consistently outperform their benchmarks. It takes many years of study and market experience to become a portfolio manager, but good results are often elusive. One theory is that there are so many skillful managers pricing shares that the market is relatively efficient and tough to beat.

Research by Hendrik Bessembinder of Arizona State University shows active management and stock selection is really difficult. He found that most stocks listed in the US since 1926 delivered lifetime negative returns relative to one-month US Treasury bills. Only 4% of companies (represented by the blue box below), or about 1,000 out of a total data base of over 25,000, produced half the returns of the entire market.




The grey space of the outer box represents the vast majority of companies that generated no returns, with 12% delisting at an average of 2.5% of their listing price. It's more common to invest in losers than winners, especially when competing against other talented analysts.

It's even more difficult to value a loss-making startup that has a good idea gaining traction. We take a close look at Raiz Invest, the former Acorns Australia, both as a micro investing platform and a company recently listed on the ASX. What's it worth? Take a guess.

Banks compete aggressively in many products, such as housing loans, but bank retail FX rates have always been pathetic. As I write this, the wholesale AUD/USD is 0.7419 and the retail rate from a major bank is 0.71. So A$100 buys US$71 at a branch instead of US$74, a difference of over 4% and a costly start to a holiday. Matthew Hayja uncovers the choices for a better deal.

The $1.6 million pension cap opens a number of financial planning choices, and Graeme Colleyand Emma Partenza explain how to contribute for a spouse with lower balances. Julie Steedalso shows how disability insurance works, something we all hope we don't need but might.

Longevity? 120 years is just the start

Few retirees know how long their money needs to last, and the doubt causes many to live frugally. Adam Curtis examines the dilemma that sequencing and longevity risks create. 
   
In the King James Bible, 2 Kings 25:27, the King of Babylon releases the King of Judah ...

"And set his throne above the throne of the kings that were with him in Babylon;
And changed his prison garments:
And he did eat bread continually before him all the days of his life.
And his allowance was a continual allowance given him of the king, a daily rate for every day, all the days of his life."


Average life expectancy in biblical times was less than 40 years, so the cost of this promise was probably not great. But in a presentation last year, Hamish Douglass of Magellan said that medical advances would allow people to live to 500. What about 1,000 years? While scientists do not unanimously support the claims of Ori Eyal, it's thought-provoking for how long retirement may last some time in the future.

Also looking into the future, the White Paper from MFS Investment Management is 'Dawn of the Urban Epoch', with the consequences for investing in an increasingly urbanised world.

ASIC on property spruikers for SMSFs

ASIC is watching SMSF service providers closely. The regulator recently found 90% of advice given to SMSFs was non-compliant and 30% risked disadvantaging the client. There was also a focus on 'one-stop shops' for the purchase of geared property through SMSFs, with groups of agents, lenders, brokers, developers and financial advisers all working together, even when a property was not suitable. So we reprise my article published in 2013 where I attended one of these spruiking seminars, when I was shocked by what happened. It's taken five years to 'crack down'.

A reminder that some new super regulations came in last week, including topping up unused $25,000 concessional limits over the following five years for super balances less than $500,000, and the new downsizing rules for people over 65 to make a non-concessional contribution.

Mark your diaries for 6 August 2018. The Financial Services Royal Commission has asked 30 superannuation funds to make a director available to give evidence. More sweaty palms.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

Edition 262 | 13 Jul 2018 | Editorial | Newsletter

 

  •   13 July 2018
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.