Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 573

Navigating the risks of retirement

The world has undergone a transition in its financial climate, moving from low-rate, stable inflation conditions to a period of higher rates, a spiralling cost of living and rising uncertainty across financial markets.

Retirees need to navigate through the immediate market turbulence knowing a wrong move now might have long-term implications, impacting retirement plans for what could be decades. Given the prevalence of these risks, it’s no surprise that funding their post-work lifestyle is a cause of stress for Australians close to retirement.

‘Controllable’ risks

There are several retirement risks that are often described as ‘controllable’, although that might not always be the case. Unforeseen circumstances can derail the best of plans, although personal insurance may provide a safety net for those forced to retire earlier than expected due to ill health or accident.

Controllable risks may include:

  • The timing of retirement – although 43%[1] of Australians surveyed in 2021 were unexpectedly forced into early retirement due to ill health, accidents, carer responsibilities, job loss or business failure.
  • The quantum of retirement savings available – while increasing contributions can mitigate the risk of insufficient savings, that’s not always possible.
  • The rate of withdrawal – the higher the rate of capital drawdown, the faster retirement savings will be consumed.

Uncontrollable risks

Uncontrollable risks are often interrelated and can result in retirees questioning how long their money will last or whether they can afford the lifestyle they want. These risks may have longer term ramifications: lower investment risk tolerance, increased uncertainty, a reduction in spending or unwanted lifestyle adjustments.

Will the savings last?

The biggest fear voiced by Australians prior to and during retirement is running out of money. This is known as longevity risk – or the risk of outliving retirement savings.

With the expectations of a longer life, how much can a retiree afford to draw down each year? For many, it’s a dire choice: live more frugally today or risk running out of money.

Inflation chips away at the value of savings

Inflation risk is once again top of mind as Australia’s cost of living rapidly increases. Higher inflation reduces the purchasing power of every dollar saved. It can exacerbate the fear of running out of money and increase loss aversion.

The compounding impact of inflation over time can erode retirement savings as illustrated in Figure 1, which uses the example of a retiree with $500,000. An annual inflation rate of 5% would result in their savings running out 10 years sooner than if inflation stayed at 2%.

Concerns about inflation and rising costs are top of mind for many pre-retirees; for those already living on a fixed income, the figure is likely to be much greater.

Figure 1: The impact of inflation

Market volatility erodes income producing assets

Financial market volatility is once again making headline news. The prevailing market conditions prior to and during retirement can affect the longevity of retirement capital and the level of income generated.

The timing, as well as the size, of a market downturn can have dramatic consequences. As modelled in Figure 2, the prevailing market conditions at the time of, and after, retirement can determine how long a retiree’s capital could last when investing in a balanced portfolio. It was chance that dealt 1982’s retirees buoyant markets, and chance that presented 1929’s retirees with a crash and rapid capital depletion.

Because retirees usually can’t align their retirement date with ideal market conditions, the decision (forced or not) to leave work can be a big gamble, particularly without the right mix of strategies and products. Unfortunately, chance can have a much greater impact on retirement outcomes than good planning.

Figure 2: Impact of retirement year on future returns

A significant capital loss requires a significant gain to get back to the same point. As illustrated in Figure 3, there is a nonlinear relationship between gains and losses; as the loss grows, the gain required to recoup the loss escalates.

Figure 3: The math of recovery from portfolio loss

A fall in market value can exacerbate longevity risk and increase loss aversion. While clients in the accumulation phase generally have the advantage of time to recover losses, retirees in the decumulation or pension phase generally don’t have this opportunity.

Timing risk impacts the longevity of retirement savings

The market conditions that prevail in the years just before and after a person retires can make an enormous difference to how long their funds last. Those crucial years are often called ‘the retirement risk zone’; a period when retirees are most vulnerable to market volatility.

If someone is fortunate enough to retire in a period of upbeat markets, then their income drawdowns will be fully or partially offset by investment returns.

However, if the ‘retirement risk zone’ (see Figure 4) coincides with a period of negative returns, retirees may start eating into their savings at an accelerated rate, potentially emptying the nest egg[2]. Market shocks during the vulnerable period will leave Australian retirees with less time to recover, while falling asset prices and drawdowns for income can magnify the scale of capital losses.

Ultimately, any losses will diminish the total value of the remaining assets.

Figure 4: Timing risk zone

Loss aversion can negatively influence retirement decision making

Loss aversion, sometimes called behavioural risk, can impact how a retiree invests, how much income they draw – and can even impact their lifestyle. A range of behavioural studies have illustrated that the pain of a loss is exacerbated in retirement, and that there are other traits and biases that can impede people from making reasonable decisions about their retirement savings.

These biases might stem from others’ experiences, the fear of outliving their savings or the fear of losing capital. Investment Trends[3] identified three retirement fears pertinent in the current environment.

Loss aversion is a major factor influencing investor behaviour, particularly in retirement when it’s difficult to recoup losses. Understanding the biases and fears that can negatively impact decision making is an essential part of retirement planning.

Navigating retirement risks

Successfully navigating the (somewhat) controllable and non-controllable risks facing retirees and pre-retirees is challenging but not unachievable. Certainly, a more comprehensive set of considerations and features need to be incorporated into this cohort’s future income and estate plans to effectively address retirement risks. This is likely to include guaranteed lifetime income, market-linked returns and downside protection, as well the flexibility to make withdrawals and to have appropriate beneficiaries receive any death benefits.

Retirement income strategies will benefit from a layered and diversified approach that includes not only a super account-based pension with the usual mix of assets and perhaps an investment property, but also more innovative income solutions that help manage the unique risks of retirement and provide for longevity without sacrificing financial flexibility.

 

Justine Marquet is Head of Technical Services at Allianz Retire+, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. For personal financial advice please speak to your financial adviser.

Allianz Guaranteed Income for Life (AGILE) is a next-generation retirement income solution that delivers certainty in the form of a guaranteed income for life. To learn more, visit www.allianzretireplus.com.au/about-us/certainty.

 

[1] Allianz Retire, [Project McFerrin], July 2021
[2] Allianz Retire+, ‘Talking about sequencing risk’, February 2019
[3] Investment Trends, 2022 Retirement Income Report, October 2022

 

9 Comments
Kevin
August 16, 2024

Watching a Deutsche Welle documentary type of thing, they may be right,and it may be the financial industry putting the frighteners on.


The shortfall from pay as you go pensions ( paid out of social security taxes.The previous 1 or 2 generations pay for pensions now) would be US$ 400 trillion by 2050. Most boomers will be dead by then,their children ( or lack of) will have fewer children to pay their pensions. The dependency ratio would down to ~ 1.8 workers for each retired worker. Using bar charts then most first world countries have huge deficits.

I was surprised to see that most of those countries did not have compulsory contributions to personal pensions/ super.,you could opt out .

The 3 countries that had foreseen this were Australia,Holland and Sweden.In general they would have small deficits,Australia being very well placed. Norway of course was not listed as Norges investment bank ( sovereign wealth fund ) was a different source to fund pensions .They made around US$ 180 billion profit for their financial year.Whether that is after funding pensions or not I don't know .That is a country that seems to have got it right.From not wealthy in the 1960s,to very wealthy now,the discovery of North Sea oil..Very cold out there on a rig,and very stormy.

Kevin
August 16, 2024

I've never seen any risk at all.All I have seen is simple and obvious.

Having the Macbank annual report to hand ( MQG) it is easy to see growth .The report is the only company I have that gives a 10 year history .

Dividends have increased from $3.30 a share to $6.40 a share . From memory franking has been 40 to 45%.Share price has increased from $76.67 to $199.70 on 31/3/24. Direct shareholder numbers in the company has probably fallen over that period. There's only ~21,000 people have a shareholding of 1000 to 5000 shares,so $200K to $1 million.

Check the other banks ANZ,CBA,NAB,SUN and WBC for the last 10 years.You'll find exactly what has happened,income has increased over 10 years,capital value has increased over 10 years as a group.The shareholdings in each of them ( for me) has increased as the DRP takes up excess income to increase shareholdings.Further excess income buys more shares in them when prices dropped.

Check how they have gone for the last 20 years,you'll find the result to be astonishing.A noise free and action free period ,a wonderful period Check how they have gone for the last 30 years,SUN and MQG weren't listed 30 years ago .

For the coming 10 years I expect much the same,share price growth perhaps slower,dividend growth,perhaps slower.Living on a good 6 figure income is easy now. I expect living on a good higher 6 figure income will be just as easy in the future.If you are making money then you'll pay tax on it. Nothing unexpected there.

Every day in the future will be the same as the past I would think,people keep repeating " YOU CAN'T DO THAT".. Then they'll have an endless list of risks that didn't happen,and probably aren't going to happen in the future,but they might,that is enough to put them off,they might happen>

Super didn't reduce much,if you draw out 10% and returns are 8 to 9% you'll die with 50% and up of your super.

If you aimed for a low income ,how can I avoid tax,then I would think the future would be worry and problems galore.

Somehow that just doesn't seem to be complicated enough for most people

David Williams
August 16, 2024

The new generation annuities are very useful. The challenge for advisers is now to ensure clients get the best overall outcomes, not just the income ones. Promoting the risk of running out of money is likely to further foster an already negative mindset about longevity.
The first step should be a process which supports a more informed longevity approach with many positives and actions to address potential negatives. Life partners can then see differences and resolve them before joint decisions, which could change over time. This process – longevity planning – provides a common, holistic framework for lifestyle, health, financial and estate planning decisions.
Super funds and advisers of all kinds should foster this simple, compliant preamble which prepares people to really make the best of their longevity.

Pete K
August 16, 2024

Pretty much agree with the comments above. A good article but not offering much by way of solutions or strategies to mitigate the challenges faced. Mark La Monica's articles are more useful and helpful in this area. I particularly liked the "bucket/s" plan that he implemented for himself and for his Mum's retirement investments. It involves holding several years' living costs worth of cash investments to be used instead of selling assets into a down market. The "buckets" are topped up from investment returns in better years.
It's what I'll be doing.
Cheers,
Pete

Paul
August 16, 2024

I also favour a modified bucket approach. Having enough super in cash to cover three years of drawdowns when you retire with the rest invested in high growth assets. Replenish the cash with say half of each years returns on the growth assets or perhaps any return above a certain amount (inflation rate?). This would boost the cash holdings to cover more than three years of drawdowns during periods of high returns and the cash holdings will fall during flat or down times. This would have worked over most periods over the past 40 years except if you retired around the start of the GFC.

Eric
August 15, 2024

An interesting article that once again highlights the problems but doesn’t offer any real solutions. Most retirees are rightly concerned about outliving their savings especially at a time when Government is actively reviewing how aged care should be paid for in the future (meaning retirees are likely to have to pay more). This problem needs a lot more creative thinking than is currently evident.

Paul McNamara
August 16, 2024

Exactly, what is the point of these series of articles? We know what the problems are, I suspect the 'solution' will be a gee wiz product.

Dudley
August 16, 2024

"a gee wiz product":

Full Age Pension. Plus home. Plus under Asset Test capital.

Paul R
August 15, 2024

Great points on controllable and uncontrollable. Not only applies to retirement but life.

 

Leave a Comment:


RELATED ARTICLES

A new retirement income product offers hope

Longevity risk solutions for retirees

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The nuts and bolts of family trusts

There are well over 800,000 family trusts in Australia, controlling more than $3 trillion of assets. Here's a guide on whether a family trust may have a place in your individual investment strategy.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 581 with weekend update

A recent industry event made me realise that a 30 year old investing trend could still have serious legs. Could it eventually pose a threat to two of Australia's biggest companies?

  • 10 October 2024

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

How have so many wealthy families through history managed to squander their fortunes? This looks at the lessons from these families and offers several solutions to making and keeping money over the long-term.

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

A big age gap can make it harder to find a solution that works for both partners – financially and otherwise. Having a frank conversation about the future, and having it as early as possible, is essential.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 578 with weekend update

The number of high-net-worth individuals in Australia has increased by almost 9% over the past year, and they now own $3.3 trillion in investable assets. A new report reveals how the wealthy are investing their money.

  • 19 September 2024

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 582 with weekend update

Heart disease has been the leading cause of death for Australians since the 1960s but new data suggests that it’s about to be overtaken by dementia, where deaths are rising thanks to our ageing population.

  • 17 October 2024

Latest Updates

Risk management

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

Planning

The gentle art of death cleaning

Most of us don't want to think about death. But there is a compelling reason why we do need to plan ahead, and that's because leaving our loved ones with a mess - financial or otherwise - is not how we want them to remember us.

Property

Why has nothing worked to fix Australia's housing mess?

Why has a succession of inquiries and reports, along with a plethora of academic papers, not led to effective action to improve housing affordability? Because the work has been aimless and unsupported by a national consensus.

Investment strategies

How to find big winners in the energy transition

The received wisdom that investors should “take a long-term view” is as well-worn as it is simplistic. Because while the long run matters, when it comes transition materials, there’s also a strong case for a bit of constructive myopia.

Economics

A Nobel Prize for work on why nations succeed and fail

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics has been awarded to three US-based economists who examined the advantages of democracy and the rule of law, and why they are strong in some countries and not others.

Gold

Gold: trustless, rustless, shiny, and tiny

While gold can create divisive views - Buffett called it a valueless pet rock - this assesses its place in portfolios from a supply-demand standpoint and versus currencies. Both angles suggest some exposure to gold is prudent.

Infrastructure

How will the US election impact energy infrastructure?

The US election is not far away and the result will have a key bearing on a host of markets and sectors. Here's a look at the possible ramifications for the global energy infrastructure industry, and the opportunities and risks.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.