Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 301

Private equity grows as listed companies are only the tip of the iceberg

Private equity is not an asset class at the top of most individual investors’ wish lists. Why? It is certainly an asset class people are aware of. It gets a lot of press, and it is an asset class that large institutional investors value and allocate to. The Future Fund, for example, has a 15% allocation to private equity.

So why don’t individual investors invest significantly in this asset class? The overriding theme is that it is too hard to access. Reasons may include a lack of suitable investment vehicles which would enable investors to obtain meaningful and diversified access. The investment process is also complicated by minimum equity commitments, the management of progressive drawdowns, irregular distributions, and long-term lock ups.

What is private equity?

Private equity typically involves taking an ownership interest in an unlisted, private business or asset. It includes a broad range of longer-term and company-specific exposures which, because they are not listed on a public market, tend to exhibit somewhat lower correlation to traditional stock and bond markets. Private equity managers seek to generate superior returns through taking an active role in monitoring and advising companies through restructuring, refocusing and revitalising tactics in order to sell the investment at a profit. It is a more hands-on investment compared to an investment in the shares of a listed company.

It may surprise some that the universe of private companies is significantly larger than that of public companies, and that the number of listed companies has been steadily decreasing. As shown in the following diagrams, since 1996 the number of US listed companies has fallen 50%.

Source: S&P Capital IQ

Global allocations by investors to private equity have been steadily growing since 2000, having increased almost 6 times over the period.

How has private equity performed?

One of the key reasons for the increasing allocations to private equity may have been its performance. Private equity has outperformed public equity across long term time horizons (10 and 20 years) as well as geographic regions. The following graphs compare private equity investments against hypothetical funds that buy and sell shares of the relevant equity index at the same time the private equity vehicles call and distribute cash.

Source: GCM, using data from Burgiss Group and MSCI

There are a number of factors that have historically contributed to the strong performance of private versus public equity. The most significant are:

  • the lack of short-term public pressure allowing for a long-term investment orientation
  • the historical resilience of performance across various market environments
  • the illiquidity premium – investors prefer liquid investments and therefore demand an increased return on less liquid alternatives.

Five ways the risks are different from listed equity

The unlisted and hands-on nature of private equity investments suggest there are different risk considerations compared to public equity markets. Some risks are of course the same – economic, market, currency, political, etc. – but others differ, and we highlight these below:

  1. Unlisted private equity investments are typically illiquid. Private equity funds may hold securities or other assets in companies that are thinly traded or for which no market exists.
  2. Distributions tend to be irregular and depend on the sale of an underlying investment.
  3. Third party pricing information is also not available for a large proportion of private equity assets. Valuations may therefore require discretionary determinations and in certain circumstances investors may have to rely on valuations from the underlying managers themselves.
  4. The companies invested in may involve a high degree of business and financial risk. They may be in the early stage of development, may be rapidly changing, may require additional capital to support their operations, or may be in a weak financial condition. While these are also opportunities, they clearly represent risks that need to be controlled by private equity managers.
  5. There is also generally less information available about private companies than their listed peers. This means that investors with higher quality information are often able to make better investment decisions and is one of the reasons performance dispersion in private equity tends to be greater than in the public markets. Extensive due diligence and careful monitoring are essential safeguards when constructing private equity portfolios.

What does private equity bring to a diversified portfolio?

Historically, one of the key benefits of private equity has been its somewhat lower correlation to other traditional assets and the diversification benefits this has provided at a portfolio level. The chart below shows that adding a 20% allocation of private equity to a traditional 60/40 equities/bond portfolio generated higher returns with lower risk (as measured by volatility) over the last 20 years.

Source: GCM using data from Burgiss Group

To an extent, the diversification may be derived from periods of economic stress such as the GFC.

How can retail investors access private equity?

Private equity has been a difficult asset class to access for individual investors. However, there are now a handful of unlisted and listed funds and trusts in Australia that overcome many of the hurdles.

Listed and unlisted vehicles have their own pros and cons, but the key is liquidity. Unlisted funds may offer daily or monthly liquidity, however, given the illiquid nature of the underlying investments, they have the ability to restrict or freeze redemptions. Listed vehicles provide liquidity for investors who can buy and sell on market as long as an active market exists.

The private equity universe is vast, differentiated by types of companies, investment strategies, and implementation options. Private investment vehicles differ markedly across these variables and, as with listed equity vehicles, it makes sense to have more than one in your portfolio.

 

Nick Griffiths is the Chief Investment Officer of Pengana Capital. This article is for general purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   10 April 2019
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

How individuals can build a private markets portfolio

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Lithium's latest drop and what it means for ASX investors

Lithium's latest sell-off has punished ASX miners as prices remain hostage to shifting expectations. The key challenge is navigating a market prone to extreme volatility despite a strong case for the long-term demand outlook.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

Planning

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Superannuation

How much super should you have?

Average super balances are one of the most misleading benchmarks. They ignore your goals, spending and future needs, creating a false sense of security. Here is how I calculate exactly where I need to be at every decade.

Retirement

Retiring from work is easy, retiring into life is harder

Most people spend decades planning how to retire. Far fewer plan for what comes next. The biggest retirement challenge isn't always financial, and it often catches even the most prepared retirees completely off guard.

Shares

Right asset class, wrong index: the trap in Australian small caps

Most Australian portfolios are concentrated in large caps, with relatively little exposure to smaller companies. But what if the biggest risk isn't the economy, interest rates or valuations? For many, the risk is hidden in plain sight.

Property

Are these assets the missing piece in Australian portfolios?

Many investors remain concentrated in shares, cash and property. Despite their popularity among institutional investors, real assets remain underrepresented in many SMSF portfolios. Could they be the missing piece?

Investment strategies

The biggest risk that buy-and-hold investors ignore

Investors spend decades learning how to stay invested, yet few have a plan for getting out. When a financial goal has a hard deadline, a worked example shows why a fixed derisking schedule should outrank buy-and-hold discipline.

Investment strategies

How passive investing is driving the decline of active fund alpha

Why have active managers struggled as passive investing has surged? Research suggests that flows into index funds and ETFs are creating structural headwinds, penalising the stock-picking strategies that once generated alpha.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.