Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

The Great Transition

  •   3 September 2015
  •      
  •   

The Great Transition examines the rise of the information economy in the context of the debate around ‘secular stagnation’. It is our view that the information economy should herald a better global economy, but this can only occur after a period of difficult transition, which requires sound policy and patience.

The transition is occurring in the context of a profound productivity shift as a consequence of China, smartphones in the hands of 1.75 billion people and the rise of services. This positive change is made problematic by both the disruption and the inability of contemporaneous statistics to properly capture the change.

Like most upheavals, the information revolution will not be pain-free. Traditional businesses and business models will fall as the industrial economy declines and the information economy expands.

However, the end result should be a better global economy, one in which consumers are increasingly empowered. It will be an economy driven by perfect competition with remarkable personalisation and a rising demand for services, some of which will come in forms that we have not yet imagined.

For western economies the challenges are immense, with the decline in entrenched industrial economies. But in the coming decade this stagnation may moderate as the information economy continues its rapid growth.

Rather than stagnation, we are facing a transition. The future will bring a world economy that works differently, that will bring opportunities and challenges to which governments, businesses and investors will need to adapt.

In The Great Transition, we examine three key themes: Productivity, Capital Consequences and Historical Rhythms.

Productivity

‘Productivity’ considers how the nature of production is changing. Analysis includes:

  • How the smartphone will drive the new economy. In 2014, almost half a billion new mobile devices were produced, 88% of which were smartphones. In that same year, mobile data traffic grew by 69%, an amount 30 times larger than the entire internet traffic of 2000.
  • China’s role in the information revolution. China has been largely responsible for putting these incredibly powerful devices in the hands of one in five of the world’s people.
  • The secrets of China’s success. In 2006, a 42-inch LCD television cost US$4000; in 2015 you could pick one up for US$384. This phenomenon has often been credited to an almost endless supply of cheap Chinese labour. However, since 2006, China’s labour costs have risen 15% a year. What China has done well is improve productivity through encouraging competition and infrastructure development.
  • The move towards services. Living standards are rising. The richer and more connected we become, the less time we have and the more we demand services. This helps improve our lives through higher consumption of leisure while increasing the employment opportunities in the same fields.


Capital consequences

‘Capital consequences’ looks at the erosion of capital’s value and the rise of the intangible. Analysis includes:

  • Declining capital. China’s perfect competition model and better outcomes for consumers will lead to an erosion of capital’s earnings power.
  • The power of connectedness and information. Consumers will no longer pay more for products due to convenience, geography or lack of information.
  • Big firms losing their advantage. Cheap information allows much smaller organisations to effectively compete with big ones. Consumers will expect personalised, high quality, competitively priced products and services, increasingly provided by individuals rather than firms.
  • The rise of GAFA. Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon may have a distinct lack of tangible assets, but they are at the forefront of the new economy and its new rules. Their assets may be intangible but their sales are not.
  • The “Tetris economy”. How using resources more efficiently can lead to an expansion in economic activity without so many inflationary pressures.

Historical rhythms

Finally, ‘historical rhythms’ looks at how the Long Depression of the late 19th century can teach us important lessons about the Great Transition. Both periods feature rising living standards, but also financial crises and deflation. Analysis includes:

  • Technological progress and its consequences. What the railway, the steamship and the telegraph can teach us about the information revolution.
  • The financial consequences of the Long Depression. How falling prices, interest and profits led to the destruction of historic capital and the rise of newer capital.

The Great Transition describes a world in which technological change allows more to be done with fewer resources. It is a world of improved productivity and the crumbling past, higher living standards but slow growth, where the old corporate economy gives way to an economy in which consumers and producers interact directly.

Sound policy and patience will be required in the years ahead. The rate of change will be exponential: in 2015 alone we may see the demise of business models and methods once considered impregnable. The transition will change our economic and investing lives profoundly, but it will also bring a wealth of opportunity.

James White is an Economist for Colonial First State Global Asset Management. This article is for information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor..

 

  •   3 September 2015
  •      
  •   
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.