Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 209

The impact of super changes on estate plans

The introduction of the $1.6 million transfer balance cap will affect the insurance and estate plans of many superannuation members. In my last article, I discussed why members must review any insurance they hold in super. Additionally, the transfer balance cap places a limit on the amount that can be paid as a death benefit pension and any excess benefits must leave the super system.

This article outlines how the use of testamentary trusts can provide estate planning certainty for super members with minor children and also allow for tax-effective distribution of income among family members.

What is a testamentary trust?

A testamentary trust is a trust that is created within a person’s Will but does not take effect until after their death. A testamentary trust may be created using specified assets, a designated portion of an estate or the entire remaining balance of an estate. Multiple testamentary trusts may be set up by the one Will.

What are the advantages of a testamentary trust?

There are some advantages creating a testamentary trust including:

Protection of beneficiaries

Many parents appreciate the tax efficiency of paying death benefit pensions to minor children but balance this with their fear of what their children may do with a large sum of money. A death benefit income stream can be commuted at age 18, which is not an age that many parents feel their child would make responsible financial choices (red sports car anyone?).

Directing some or all of the super balance to a testamentary trust can address this issue because the parent can control when a child has access to funds. A testamentary trust is particularly important for clients affected by the $1.6 million transfer balance cap where excess monies must leave the super system.

Clients may have other beneficiaries who will benefit from not having direct control over an inheritance. These can include spendthrift beneficiaries, those with gambling, alcohol or drug addictions or people who are easily influenced by others.

Taxation advantages

Trusts can retain taxable income or it can be allocated to the beneficiaries in a tax-effective manner. The trustee can be given discretionary powers about the distribution of income, which makes the testamentary trust a flexible tax-planning vehicle.

Beneficiaries pay income tax at their individual marginal rates on the amount of income they receive from the trust. However, unlike tax on income from other sources, beneficiaries of testamentary trusts under age 18 are taxed at normal adult rates rather than the penalty tax rate applied to minors. As a result, the potential for tax savings when trust income is allocated to children can be substantial.

Flexibility for a primary beneficiary

If included within the terms of the trust, the trustee can exercise discretion as to the distribution of income to beneficiaries at any time and in any proportion. There may be tax planning reasons for a primary beneficiary, such as a surviving spouse, to request the allocation of income to other beneficiaries.

Protection of assets

As the beneficiaries do not legally own the assets of the trust, testamentary trusts provide a level of protection in the event of a beneficiary’s relationship breakdown. Assets are held in a trust and the income and capital are distributed at the discretion of the trustee (who would typically not be the child in the difficult relationship).

The use of a testamentary trust can also be helpful for clients with beneficiaries who are at risk of bankruptcy. If a Will leaves assets directly to a beneficiary, if they become bankrupt, their inheritance may pass straight through to the trustee or to creditors. Assets held in a testamentary trust are usually better protected.

Case study - Margaret

Margaret is a single parent aged 42 who has two minor children. She has an accumulation account which holds $400,000 and life insurance of $2 million.

If Margaret dies, each child will be limited to a death benefit pension of $800,000 (half of the $1.6 million transfer balance cap). The remaining $400,000 for each child must leave the super system as a lump sum payment.

It suits Margaret’s plans for each of her children to have $800,000 as a death benefit pension, but she does not want them to have immediate access to the additional $400,000. Margaret changes her death benefit nomination to direct the excess to her estate and establishes a testamentary trust for each child via her Will.

Conclusion

The introduction of the super changes from 1 July 2017 is a catalyst for super fund members to review their estate plans. Professional estate planning advice can provide members with peace of mind that their super death benefits will be distributed to beneficiaries as per their wishes in the most tax-effective way.

 

Julie Steed is Senior Technical Services Manager at Australian Executor Trustees. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   6 July 2017
  • 3
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Most estate planning for tax is inadequate

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

How to minimise tax with a will

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.