Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 17

Value investing and valuing a business

Originating from the economist and investor Benjamin Graham, the philosophy of value investing has been a strategy employed by some of the most successful investors in history including Warren Buffet and David Dodd. This approach revolves around investing in stocks trading at a discount to their intrinsic value but there is always one critical question inherent in this investment philosophy; what valuation multiples do you use to identify the intrinsic value of a company?

Selecting valuation multiples

Unfortunately there is no single method of valuation and it is subjective whether an investor places more importance on current assets and earnings or on future cash flows and growth prospects. Over the years there have been opposing thoughts. Modern Portfolio Theory argues that due to the Efficient Market Hypothesis, all stocks trade at their fair value and it is impossible to identify undervalued shares. Yet it is widely agreed that value stocks have consistently outperformed growth stocks in the long term and some of the most successful investors have continued to outperform the market by identifying companies that are trading at a significant discount to their intrinsic value.

Keeping in mind that there are a range of multiples and valuation models that can be employed in value investing, there are some key factors that are often considered in valuing a business.

When we qualitatively analyse the quality of a business, the fundamental drivers of value include the company’s management team and their experience in the respective sector, the company’s strategy and plans in place for the company’s expansion. Translating this to quantitative drivers, return on equity and capital, debt to equity ratios and cost of capital come into play. A value investor should also take into consideration accounting policy differences which can skew profit multiples, and can lead to misleading valuations of companies in comparison to its sector. Depreciation, goodwill, provisions and deferred tax should be considered. As a result, a company’s cash flow is a good metric for valuation as it is free from accounting distortions and its EBITDA is a suitable measure to assess profitability.

The Price to Earnings (PE) Ratio is one of the most common multiples used by the retail investor to indicate if a share is over or undervalued but this can be misleading for a few reasons:

  • earnings are subject to different accounting policies
  • different capital structures will lead to a gearing effect on the earnings which will skew results for different companies
  • a low PE could be a sign of negative market sentiment towards the stock rather than a reflection of the stock being undervalued.

The Price to Book Value, which represents a company’s share price over its book value, is often used to value a business where value is generated through its tangible assets. This is where Return on Equity comes into play. Financial stocks, especially banks, are often valued using the Return on Equity ratio due to their high levels of leverage from deposits coupled with significant assets through loans. Return on Equity can reflect how efficiently a company utilises shareholders’ equity to produce profit, as well as how effective the company manages its debt and asset turnover. A company with a consistently increasing Return on Equity and a decreasing debt level is often a sign of an effectively-managed business.

After analysing these key valuation multiples, investors should gain an in-depth understanding of the company’s business model and its sector to make a more informed investment decision.

What to look for in listed companies

My golden rules for investing are:

  • Make informed and educated investment decisions
  • Know why you are buying shares in the company
  • Do not speculate
  • Invest only when there is an opportunity
  • Invest in quality companies with great future prospects
  • Understand the business before investing
  • Have an exit strategy
  • Have patience and discipline.

Value investing is a strategy used by some of the most renowned investors in history and is a proven approach that can help the medium to long term investor identify undervalued businesses. The market is dynamic and volatile and investors should have a clear strategy and direction before making any investment decision. An individual should invest in quality stocks that are trading below their intrinsic value with a target in mind.

 

Michael Kodari is Managing Director of Kodari Securities (KOSEC).

 

  •   30 May 2013
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Quality over quantity: a lesson of value

Don’t go swimming naked for a short term thrill

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.