Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 326

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 326

  •   3 October 2019
  •      
  •   

Last week, the Government announced the first Retirement Income Review since the 1993 Fitzgerald inquiry into national savings, which followed the introduction of compulsory super by Paul Keating in 1992. As background for this new Review, we have selected six Classic Articles, including one from Keating himself, which many readers would otherwise miss. These special pieces were highly popular when first published and all had something different about them.

The Government's Terms of Reference for the coming nine-month review say:

"The review will look at the three pillars of the existing retirement income system, being the age pension, compulsory superannuation and voluntary savings. (It) will cover the current state of the system and how it will perform in the future as Australians live longer and the population ages." 

Notably, while the Government has already ruled out including the family home in the age pension assets test, there are references to both 'fiscal sustainability' and 'appropriate incentives for self-provision in retirement".

It's therefore a good time to dip into the archives for some classic insights, and there's nowhere better to start than with Paul Keating, father of our superannuation system. He admitted in this 2013 article that SMSFs were a late afterthought, and now they're the largest super segment. Keating gave some valuable guidelines for asset allocation:

"So, Australia is 2.5 times more heavily weighted into equities and relatively underweight other asset classes. We are disproportionately weighted into the most volatile and unstable asset class."

In the same year, Justin Wood's spending guidelines for retirees took up a similar theme. He used Yale University's endowment fund as an example of an investor with long-term obligations subject to short-term markets. It's fascinating, therefore, to check how Yale has changed in the subsequent six years. Here is their latest asset allocation taken from their website.




Yale's Chief Investment Officer, David Swensen, is a legend in the US, delivering an extra $4.5 billion in value over the last decade versus the average of other endowments, while delivering 11.8% pa for 20 years. He is a great believer in the value of active management, here in 2017 disagreeing with Warren Buffett:

"While Buffett appropriately recognizes the challenges investors face in manager selection—perhaps most notably that the vast majority of managers who attempt to outperform fail after taking into account fees and expenses—his conclusion goes too far. The superior results of Yale and a number of peers strongly suggest that active management can be a powerful tool for institutions that commit the resources to achieve superior, risk-adjusted investment results.

He has changed his asset allocation such that US equities are now only 3.5% of assets and most of his holdings are in unlisted assets, venture capital or absolute return funds which are difficult for retail investors to access. He invests differently because he is not seeking to beat a benchmark but achieve long-term stability for the future security of Yale's funding. Swensen's main lesson is: invest according to your own goals and don't be paranoid about the market.   

Here is how he differed from other educational endowments in the US in 2018:

Which is a good link to Chris Cuffe's Classic Article on the mistakes most people make in thinking about investment risk, and he draws on Howard Marks to give his own definition of risk.

Noel Whittaker is Australia's best-known personal adviser and best-selling author, and in 2018, he provided his quick-fire 20 Commandments of Wealth for retirees. Timeless wisdom!

And finally, in a change of pace, two unconventional articles that were big hits in 2016 and 2017.

Jo Heighway draws on her many years as an SMSF specialist with a unique perspective on how many of her clients are so passionate about their SMSF that it becomes a biography of their life.

Then Alex Denham tells a personal and precautionary story about her father's experience with aged care, which all her years as a financial adviser did not fully prepare her for.

(Note that some of these authors are no longer in the role described at the bottom of the articles, and some of the rules and numbers may have changed but we have not reedited the words).

Back to new and 'first link' articles next week, and remember there are thousands of articles in our archive covering almost every financial topic.

 

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here. For a PDF version of the article on the Retirement Income Review, click the 'Print' button at the top of the article.

 

  •   3 October 2019
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.