Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 326

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 326

  •   3 October 2019
  •      
  •   

Last week, the Government announced the first Retirement Income Review since the 1993 Fitzgerald inquiry into national savings, which followed the introduction of compulsory super by Paul Keating in 1992. As background for this new Review, we have selected six Classic Articles, including one from Keating himself, which many readers would otherwise miss. These special pieces were highly popular when first published and all had something different about them.

The Government's Terms of Reference for the coming nine-month review say:

"The review will look at the three pillars of the existing retirement income system, being the age pension, compulsory superannuation and voluntary savings. (It) will cover the current state of the system and how it will perform in the future as Australians live longer and the population ages." 

Notably, while the Government has already ruled out including the family home in the age pension assets test, there are references to both 'fiscal sustainability' and 'appropriate incentives for self-provision in retirement".

It's therefore a good time to dip into the archives for some classic insights, and there's nowhere better to start than with Paul Keating, father of our superannuation system. He admitted in this 2013 article that SMSFs were a late afterthought, and now they're the largest super segment. Keating gave some valuable guidelines for asset allocation:

"So, Australia is 2.5 times more heavily weighted into equities and relatively underweight other asset classes. We are disproportionately weighted into the most volatile and unstable asset class."

In the same year, Justin Wood's spending guidelines for retirees took up a similar theme. He used Yale University's endowment fund as an example of an investor with long-term obligations subject to short-term markets. It's fascinating, therefore, to check how Yale has changed in the subsequent six years. Here is their latest asset allocation taken from their website.




Yale's Chief Investment Officer, David Swensen, is a legend in the US, delivering an extra $4.5 billion in value over the last decade versus the average of other endowments, while delivering 11.8% pa for 20 years. He is a great believer in the value of active management, here in 2017 disagreeing with Warren Buffett:

"While Buffett appropriately recognizes the challenges investors face in manager selection—perhaps most notably that the vast majority of managers who attempt to outperform fail after taking into account fees and expenses—his conclusion goes too far. The superior results of Yale and a number of peers strongly suggest that active management can be a powerful tool for institutions that commit the resources to achieve superior, risk-adjusted investment results.

He has changed his asset allocation such that US equities are now only 3.5% of assets and most of his holdings are in unlisted assets, venture capital or absolute return funds which are difficult for retail investors to access. He invests differently because he is not seeking to beat a benchmark but achieve long-term stability for the future security of Yale's funding. Swensen's main lesson is: invest according to your own goals and don't be paranoid about the market.   

Here is how he differed from other educational endowments in the US in 2018:

Which is a good link to Chris Cuffe's Classic Article on the mistakes most people make in thinking about investment risk, and he draws on Howard Marks to give his own definition of risk.

Noel Whittaker is Australia's best-known personal adviser and best-selling author, and in 2018, he provided his quick-fire 20 Commandments of Wealth for retirees. Timeless wisdom!

And finally, in a change of pace, two unconventional articles that were big hits in 2016 and 2017.

Jo Heighway draws on her many years as an SMSF specialist with a unique perspective on how many of her clients are so passionate about their SMSF that it becomes a biography of their life.

Then Alex Denham tells a personal and precautionary story about her father's experience with aged care, which all her years as a financial adviser did not fully prepare her for.

(Note that some of these authors are no longer in the role described at the bottom of the articles, and some of the rules and numbers may have changed but we have not reedited the words).

Back to new and 'first link' articles next week, and remember there are thousands of articles in our archive covering almost every financial topic.

 

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here. For a PDF version of the article on the Retirement Income Review, click the 'Print' button at the top of the article.

 

  •   3 October 2019
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Latest Updates

Planning

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Superannuation

There's a reason why your super is locked up until your 60s

For decades, it seemed settled. Then one controversial idea reignited a debate that could reshape the financial future of millions. The real question isn’t who’s right or wrong, but whether a long-held assumption deserves another look.

Property

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Retirement

Under-retiring: The greatest retirement risk in a generation

Two retirees. Similar savings. Completely different lives. New research from Challenger reveals why some Australians confidently spend in retirement while others hold back and the overlooked factor shaping retirement decisions.

Five risks to watch in markets

Things you may often hear are: a recession is around the corner, markets are overpriced, the AI sector is about to flop at any moment. It’s like the never-ending laundry pile that sits in my house, it never really disappears.

Investment strategies

Do you qualify as ‘rich’?

What does it mean to be 'rich'? For something so universally desired, it is surprisingly difficult to define. That ambiguity creates a challenge for investors and raises a bigger question about what financial success really looks like.

Investment strategies

If you’re worried about your bond portfolio, you’re missing the point

Most investors think they know what bonds are for. But when markets turn volatile, a surprising misunderstanding can lead to costly decisions. Here’s the overlooked lesson that could change how you view your portfolio.

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.