Over the last 10 days, the major Australian banks have reported their financial results for 2017, with collective annual profits of $31.5 billion. In comparison to the May reporting season (which saw the surprise introduction of a 0.06% levy on the liabilities and $50 billion wiped off the bank’s collective market capitalisation), the results were mostly in line with expectations. A key feature in the last round was how efficiently the financial impact of this ‘game-changing’ levy or tax was passed onto borrowers.
Our reporting season awards
This article examines the common themes emerging, differentiates between the banks and hands out our reporting season awards to the financial intermediaries that grease the wheels of Australian capitalism.
Cash earnings growth. Across the sector profit growth was generally in-line with the credit growth in the overall Australian economy. ANZ reported headline profit growth of 7.6% after backing out the impact of the sale of the bank’s Asian retail businesses, Esanda and property gains from 2016. The growth across the sector was achieved by improving economic conditions and lower bad debts. All banks reported lower trading income due to decreased volatility over the year. During periods of higher market volatility, the banks can boost their income by both selling more foreign exchange and interest rate derivative contracts to their clients. However, they can also generate trading income by using their large balance sheet reserves to trade securities on the global markets.
Angry on costs. Reducing costs featured prominently in the plans of bank CEOs for the upcoming year, with much discussion about branch closures and headcount reductions. The removal of ATM bank charges and the migration of transactional banking from the physical bank branch to the internet is likely to deliver an efficiency dividend to the banks. NAB took the most aggressive stance, announcing that the bank will reduce its workforce by 6,000 employees due to business simplification and increasing automation. However, this will come at a cost with NAB expecting to book a restructuring charge of between $500-$800 million in 2018 and increases in investment spend by $1.5 billion. They may also be a ‘political’ price.
Bad debt charges still very low. One of the key themes across the four major banks and indeed the biggest driver of earnings growth over the last few years has been the ongoing decline in bad debts. Falling bad debts boost bank profitability, as loans are priced assuming that a certain percentage of borrowers will be unable to repay and that the outstanding loan amount is greater than the collateral eventually recovered. Bad debts fell further in 2017, as some previously stressed or non-performing loans were paid off or returned to making interest payments, primarily due to a buoyant East Coast property market and higher commodity prices. CBA gets the gold star with a very small impairment charge in first quarter 2018 courtesy of their higher weight to housing loans in their loan book. Historically home loans attract the lowest level of defaults.
Dividend growth stalled but may return. Across the sector dividend growth has essentially stopped, with CBA providing the only increase of 9 cents over 2016. With relatively benign profit growth, a bank can either increase dividends to shareholders or retain profits to build capital (thereby protecting banks against financial shocks), but not both. In the recent set of results the banks have held dividends steady to boost their Tier 1 capital ratios. Additionally, dividend growth has been limited as the banks have absorbed the impact of the additional shares issued in late 2015 to boost capital.
Looking ahead, there may be some capacity to increase dividends (especially from ANZ and CBA after asset sales), as the rebuild of bank capital to APRA’s standards is largely complete. The major Australian banks in aggregate are currently sitting on a grossed-up yield (including franking credits) of 8.2%.
Net interest margins up. In aggregate, margins increased in 2017, despite the imposition of the major bank levy. This was attributed to lower funding costs and repricing of existing loans to higher rates. In response to regulator concerns about an over-heated residential property market and in particular the growth in interest-only loans to property investors, the banks have repriced these loans higher than those repaying both principal and interest. For example, Westpac currently charges 6.3% on an interest-only loan to an investor, which contrasts to the 4.4% being charged to owner occupiers paying both principal and interest. This has had the impact of boosting bank net interest margins.
One of the key things we looked at closely during this results season was signs of expanding net interest margin ((Interest Received - Interest Paid) divided by Average Invested Assets), and this was apparent even after allowing for May’s levy.
Total returns. In 2017, NAB has been the top performing bank, benefitting from delivering cleaner results after it jettisoned its UK issues with spin-off of the Clydesdale Bank and Yorkshire Bank. CBA has been the worst performing bank as it faces both the imminent retirement of its CEO and the uncertainty around possible fines from foreign regulators for not complying with anti-money laundering laws. This has resulted in CBA losing the market premium rating that it has enjoyed for a number of years over the other banks.
Our final take
What to do with the Australian banks is one of the major questions facing both institutional and retail investors alike. The Australian banks have been successful over the past few years in generating record profits, benefiting from lower competition from non-bank lenders and record low bad debts. Looking ahead it is not easy to see how the banks can deliver earnings growth above the low single digits in an environment of low credit growth, increased regulatory scrutiny and the sale of some of their insurance and wealth management divisions.
Competition amongst the big four banks is likely to increase, as for the first time since 1987 (NAB’s purchase of Clydesdale Bank) we have no Australian banks distracted by foreign adventures, with all four focused on the Australian market. However, looking around the Australian market the banks look relatively cheap, are well capitalised and unlike other income stocks such as Telstra should have little difficulty in maintaining their high fully franked dividends.
Hugh Dive is Chief Investment Officer of Atlas Fund Management. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.
See also:
KPMG’s Major Australian Banks Full Year 2017 Results Analysis
EY’s Australian major banks’ full year results 2017.