Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 529

Clime time: Why stocks beat bonds for income investors

Over the past 10 years, the S&P/ASX Price Index has delivered meek returns, though the picture improves when dividends are included in the Total Return Index.

The 10-year returns are:

  1. The Price Index return is about 38% or 3.2% annual compound, and
  2. The Accumulation (Total Return) Index is about 110% or 8% annual compound (but before franking).

Following the market correction since mid-August 2023, the capital gain of the market index from when Covid hit in March 2020 is now about zero for the last 4.5 years. The return including dividends that are fully reinvested is a healthier 30% (pre franking) over the entire period. However, this 4.5-year return of about 6.6% per annum is below both our targeted and expected long-term return of 8% per annum.

In reality, the Accumulation Index return is an appropriate measure of the equity market return for an SMSF in 'accumulation mode'. However, it is not a measure of the (longer-term) return for an investor who takes the cash dividend from the market to fund a pension. 

The post-Covid investment cycle

This background leads us to consider the dramatic change in income returns across asset classes that have flowed as the world economy transitioned from post GFC, through Covid and now into a post-Covid cycle.

Projected and actual asset returns drive investment allocation that is also adjusted by the risk profile of the investor (SMSF). Returns from capital gain and income, from all asset classes, will be driven by the investment climate as measured by cash rates, bond yields and the interplay of 'risk free returns' with equity prices measured by Price/Earnings Ratios (PER) and property capitalisation rates.

The world has moved from the post-GFC cycle where the introduction of quantitative easing (QE) to fund burgeoning government debt, plus highly supportive fiscal settings, dominated. Covid checked the anticipated slowdown and the reversal of QE towards quantitative tightening (QT). Indeed, it actually reaccelerated QE, noting it was aggressively introduced in both Australia and around the world. A feature of the Covid era was that most bond yields across the world hovered well below 1% and they were deeply negative in Europe and Japan.

The post COVID era, began during 2022 when lockdowns ceased, ushered in a new investing environment. The era of near zero interest rates is over, and decades of deflation driven by globalisation and demographic changes are being replaced by an extended period of cost-based inflation.

Across asset classes, the most material change has been seen in bond markets. For instance, over the last two years, the yield on an Australian two-year bond has moved from near zero to above 4%. It has been a painful period for passive bond investors with the price of all bonds materially declining. The good news today is that the annual income that can be generated from holding a 'near risk free asset' has become more attractive in nominal terms. But are bonds attractive enough?

Preferring equities over bonds

While bonds can deliver the benefits of diversification in a balanced portfolio, the argument for their role as a key driver of portfolio returns must be framed relative to inflation. Inflation has probably peaked in Australia, yet the most recent CPI release for the June quarter was 6%, still well above the two-year bond yield. Given that government bonds are a fixed income returning assets, their ability to outperform inflation is not currently on offer.

Therefore, a pension portfolio should maintain an appropriate and meaningful allocation to the Australian equity market with the purpose to deliver a growing income stream that is enhanced by franking.

Importantly when comparing Australian equity returns to global market returns, companies here have higher dividend yields. And it is a historical fact that the Australian equity market has delivered total returns, including dividends, that are above most of the developed world. The following chart from the RBA chart book demonstrates this.

Investing in the Australian equity market, like all equity markets, is not without risk. However, with elevated inflation likely to persist well into 2024, equities will continue to play a key role in delivering on pension focussed long-term income objectives and defend against the impact of inflation.

The surging equity market during Covid was driven by bloated PERs due to excessively low bond yields. Post-Covid, PERs have declined but equity dividend payments have risen, while bonds have entered a third year of negative returns.

 

Will Riggall is CIO of Clime Group, a sponsor of Firstlinks, and oversees the Ralton Dividend Builder, available on several leading platforms and Clime Capital, the group’s listed investment vehicle, has been constructed to deliver a high and growing tax effective dividend stream. The information contained in this article is of a general nature only and is current as at the date of publishing. It does not take into account the goals, objectives, or personal circumstances of any person.

For more articles and papers from Clime, click here.

 

  •   4 October 2023
  • 3
  •      
  •   
3 Comments
Keith Milera
October 05, 2023

I find it fascinating the contrast between the dividend culture here and the buyback/minimal dividend culture in the US. The US has throttled the Aussie market over the past 20 years, yet Australian has outperformed over 100 years. Which country is right? I suppose it depends on the growth opportunities and there may be more in the US than here at present.

Steve
October 06, 2023

I believe taxes are the driver. Dividends and capital gains are not taxed at the same level in the US and we on the other hand have franking credits on dividends. So the US use profits to buy back shares and provide capital gains (shares are more valuable when you shrink the pool) and we are driven towards dividends because of the value of franking credits.
Personally I get frustrated by the near universal inability of Aussie finance outfits to factor in franking when talking total return. Why not a new term (gross return?) to show the true grossed up returns? It's dead simple maths but few bother. The annoying thing is these people claim to be providing information for more informed decisions but leave out a key component. Given dividends are a massive part of total returns in Australia so franking credits also are a large part which any serious publication would feel compelled to factor in?

Philip Rix
October 09, 2023

Totally agree with Steve’s comments! Franking credits absolutely have value to all (at least Australian resident) Investors when ever dividends are paid. Even non residents shareholders benefit as no withholding tax is applicable when dividends are franked.
‘Yes’, publishing ‘Gross’ returns as suggested makes perfect sense!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Clime time: Asset allocation decisions for SMSFs

The grass is always greener: Rethinking Australian vs global equities

The most important investment decision you’ll ever make

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.