Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 529

Clime time: Why stocks beat bonds for income investors

Over the past 10 years, the S&P/ASX Price Index has delivered meek returns, though the picture improves when dividends are included in the Total Return Index.

The 10-year returns are:

  1. The Price Index return is about 38% or 3.2% annual compound, and
  2. The Accumulation (Total Return) Index is about 110% or 8% annual compound (but before franking).

Following the market correction since mid-August 2023, the capital gain of the market index from when Covid hit in March 2020 is now about zero for the last 4.5 years. The return including dividends that are fully reinvested is a healthier 30% (pre franking) over the entire period. However, this 4.5-year return of about 6.6% per annum is below both our targeted and expected long-term return of 8% per annum.

In reality, the Accumulation Index return is an appropriate measure of the equity market return for an SMSF in 'accumulation mode'. However, it is not a measure of the (longer-term) return for an investor who takes the cash dividend from the market to fund a pension. 

The post-Covid investment cycle

This background leads us to consider the dramatic change in income returns across asset classes that have flowed as the world economy transitioned from post GFC, through Covid and now into a post-Covid cycle.

Projected and actual asset returns drive investment allocation that is also adjusted by the risk profile of the investor (SMSF). Returns from capital gain and income, from all asset classes, will be driven by the investment climate as measured by cash rates, bond yields and the interplay of 'risk free returns' with equity prices measured by Price/Earnings Ratios (PER) and property capitalisation rates.

The world has moved from the post-GFC cycle where the introduction of quantitative easing (QE) to fund burgeoning government debt, plus highly supportive fiscal settings, dominated. Covid checked the anticipated slowdown and the reversal of QE towards quantitative tightening (QT). Indeed, it actually reaccelerated QE, noting it was aggressively introduced in both Australia and around the world. A feature of the Covid era was that most bond yields across the world hovered well below 1% and they were deeply negative in Europe and Japan.

The post COVID era, began during 2022 when lockdowns ceased, ushered in a new investing environment. The era of near zero interest rates is over, and decades of deflation driven by globalisation and demographic changes are being replaced by an extended period of cost-based inflation.

Across asset classes, the most material change has been seen in bond markets. For instance, over the last two years, the yield on an Australian two-year bond has moved from near zero to above 4%. It has been a painful period for passive bond investors with the price of all bonds materially declining. The good news today is that the annual income that can be generated from holding a 'near risk free asset' has become more attractive in nominal terms. But are bonds attractive enough?

Preferring equities over bonds

While bonds can deliver the benefits of diversification in a balanced portfolio, the argument for their role as a key driver of portfolio returns must be framed relative to inflation. Inflation has probably peaked in Australia, yet the most recent CPI release for the June quarter was 6%, still well above the two-year bond yield. Given that government bonds are a fixed income returning assets, their ability to outperform inflation is not currently on offer.

Therefore, a pension portfolio should maintain an appropriate and meaningful allocation to the Australian equity market with the purpose to deliver a growing income stream that is enhanced by franking.

Importantly when comparing Australian equity returns to global market returns, companies here have higher dividend yields. And it is a historical fact that the Australian equity market has delivered total returns, including dividends, that are above most of the developed world. The following chart from the RBA chart book demonstrates this.

Investing in the Australian equity market, like all equity markets, is not without risk. However, with elevated inflation likely to persist well into 2024, equities will continue to play a key role in delivering on pension focussed long-term income objectives and defend against the impact of inflation.

The surging equity market during Covid was driven by bloated PERs due to excessively low bond yields. Post-Covid, PERs have declined but equity dividend payments have risen, while bonds have entered a third year of negative returns.

 

Will Riggall is CIO of Clime Group, a sponsor of Firstlinks, and oversees the Ralton Dividend Builder, available on several leading platforms and Clime Capital, the group’s listed investment vehicle, has been constructed to deliver a high and growing tax effective dividend stream. The information contained in this article is of a general nature only and is current as at the date of publishing. It does not take into account the goals, objectives, or personal circumstances of any person.

For more articles and papers from Clime, click here.

 

  •   4 October 2023
  • 3
  •      
  •   
3 Comments
Keith Milera
October 05, 2023

I find it fascinating the contrast between the dividend culture here and the buyback/minimal dividend culture in the US. The US has throttled the Aussie market over the past 20 years, yet Australian has outperformed over 100 years. Which country is right? I suppose it depends on the growth opportunities and there may be more in the US than here at present.

Steve
October 06, 2023

I believe taxes are the driver. Dividends and capital gains are not taxed at the same level in the US and we on the other hand have franking credits on dividends. So the US use profits to buy back shares and provide capital gains (shares are more valuable when you shrink the pool) and we are driven towards dividends because of the value of franking credits.
Personally I get frustrated by the near universal inability of Aussie finance outfits to factor in franking when talking total return. Why not a new term (gross return?) to show the true grossed up returns? It's dead simple maths but few bother. The annoying thing is these people claim to be providing information for more informed decisions but leave out a key component. Given dividends are a massive part of total returns in Australia so franking credits also are a large part which any serious publication would feel compelled to factor in?

Philip Rix
October 09, 2023

Totally agree with Steve’s comments! Franking credits absolutely have value to all (at least Australian resident) Investors when ever dividends are paid. Even non residents shareholders benefit as no withholding tax is applicable when dividends are franked.
‘Yes’, publishing ‘Gross’ returns as suggested makes perfect sense!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Clime time: Asset allocation decisions for SMSFs

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Investing for generations

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Indexation implications – key changes to 2026/27 super thresholds

Stay on top of the latest changes to superannuation rates and thresholds for 2026, including increases to transfer balance cap, concessional contributions cap, and non-concessional contributions cap.

The refinery problem: A different kind of energy crisis in 2026

The Strait of Hormuz closure due to US-Iran conflict severely disrupted global energy supply chains. While various emergency measures mitigated the crude impact, the refined product market faces unprecedented stress.

The missing 30%: how LIC returns are understated, and why it matters

The perceived underperformance of LICs compared to ETFs is due to existing comparison data excluding crucial information, highlighting the need for proper assessment and transparent reporting.

Little‑known government scheme can help retirees tap into $3 trillion of housing wealth

The Home Equity Access Scheme in Australia allows older homeowners to tap into their home equity for retirement income, yet remains underused due to lack of awareness and its perceived complexity.

Origins of the mislabeled capital gains tax ‘discount’

Debate over the CGT discount is intensifying amid concerns about intergenerational equity and housing affordability. This analysis shows that the 'discount' does not necessarily favor property investors.

Div 296 may mean your estate pays tax on assets your beneficiaries never receive

The new super tax, applying from 1 July, introduces more than just a higher rate on large balances. It brings into focus a misalignment between where wealth sits and where the tax on that wealth ultimately falls.

Latest Updates

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2026

Here is a checklist of 28 important issues you should address before June 30 to ensure your SMSF or other super fund is in order and that you are making the most of the strategies available.

Retirement

Two months into retirement

A retirement researcher's take on retirement and her focus on each of her six resource buckets to stay engaged during the transition and beyond.

Superannuation

Markets have always delivered for super fund members. What if they don’t?

What happens if market resilience in the face of ongoing geopolitical tensions ends? Potential decade-long market weakness shows the need for contingency planning.

Retirement

We tend to spend less in retirement …

Studies show that a drop in expenditure during retirement leads to a happier retirement. But when costs ramp up again later in life, it's a guaranteed income that makes spending more hurt less.

Shares

Can you value a share just using dividends?

A cow for her milk, a stock for her dividends. Investors are too quick to dismiss this valuation technique. 

Property

The 25-year property trust default is being questioned

The 33% CGT discount rate being floated isn’t random. It sits at the structural break-even between trust and company for the multi-property cohort. That’s driving the conversation we’re hearing now.

Investment strategies

Are active managers bringing a knife to a gunfight?

How passive investing has permanently changed market structure — and why sophisticated tools are now the price of survival.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.