Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 470

The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

The successful completion of the takeover of Sydney Airport (when listed, ASX:SYD) in March 2022 marked the conclusion of 20 years as a listed entity. The journey was long and colourful, with many lessons learned along the way in terms of aviation, finance, governance and politics. Since the inception of the Cromwell Phoenix Property Securities Fund (the Fund) in April 2008, Sydney Airport was a core holding and a big positive contributor to the Fund’s returns. This article distils the journey into a short read, with all puns intended.

Running out of runway in a turbulent first year

In the aftermath of the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and the subsequent demise of Ansett in March 2002, Macquarie Airports (then ASX:MAP) listed on the Australian Stock Exchange on 2 April 2002. Timing is everything!

Macquarie Airports, which many years later would become Sydney Airport, started life as an externally managed fund with a mandate to invest in airport assets in Australasia and Europe. The seed asset was a 36.7% stake in Macquarie Airports Group Limited, which gave Macquarie Airports an 18.4% exposure to Bristol Airport and an 8.9% exposure to Birmingham Airport, both in the UK.

The other significant attribute at inception was its participation in the Southern Cross Airports Corporation consortium which was Macquarie Bank’s bidding vehicle for the privatisation of Sydney Airport.

The Macquarie Airports initial public offering (IPO) raised a whopping $1 billion. Partly to reflect the size, and partly to give Macquarie some flexibility, the deal was structured in the form of partly paid shares, with $500 million raised upfront in April 2002 at $1 per unit, and a second call of $1 per unit, payable in September 2002 to raise an additional $500 million.

The stock listed at a small discount to its issue price and then commenced a glide path. Unless there are extremely favourable thermals, glide paths rarely point upwards.

On 25 June 2002, the Australian Federal Government announced that the Southern Cross Airports Corporation Consortium had won the bid to privatise Sydney Airport. Macquarie Airports, via its 40% direct stake in the winning consortium and also indirectly via its stake in Macquarie Airports Group, also part of the consortium, became a 44% investor in Sydney Airport.

Winning bid takes off but not the share price

The winning bid comprised $5.396 billion for the airport, and a further $192 million for the Ansett terminal. This was considered colossally high at the time and the market price of Macquarie Airports reacted negatively.

The price paid represented a multiple of 14.3 times forecast June 2003 earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of $377 million and a forecast project level internal rate of return of 12.1%. Given the geared structure of the consortium, the direct equity cost to Macquarie Airports for its 40% stake in the consortium was $815 million.

Not deterred by a slumping unit price, on 16 July 2002, Macquarie Airports announced a second large acquisition, also via a Macquarie consortium, for the purchase of a 28% stake in Aeroporti di Roma which owned 100% of the Rome airports Fiumicino and Ciampino.

Given the acquisitions of stakes in both Sydney and Rome in quick succession, plus Macquarie’s appetite for fees, the transaction also required a further capital raising, this time at $1.50 per unit on a fully paid basis (compared to the $2 initial price, paid over two instalments). Rome’s profit for the half year to June 2002 was initially poorly received by the market, albeit a little misunderstood. This subsequently sent the Macquarie Airports unit price lower ahead of the final call of the initial IPO stock.

The day before the call was due, the unit price hit 16.5 cents, with many investors worried about what had happened to their original $1 investment. So much so, that approximately 58 million of the original 500 million units failed to make the second payment, and Macquarie Equity Capital Markets was forced to take up the stock and sell it into the market.

As we subsequently moved into 2003, the effects of SARS (the first one) and the Iraq War combined to drive Macquarie Airports lower. At its low, the $2 fully paid IPO stock touched 80 cents before commencing what would ultimately become a staggering rally.

In July 2003, Macquarie Bank, in recognition of the tumultuous journey that investors had been on since listing, announced a waiver of performance fees due in respect of Macquarie Airports. Furthermore, future performance fees would also be waived until such time as investors had accumulated returns above the Morgan Stanley Capital Index World Transportation Infrastructure Index (the Benchmark). A mark of confidence indeed.

While the share price had not climbed above its fully paid IPO price by the time of the first full year results call in August 2003, the company was able to demonstrate that Sydney Airport’s EBITDA figures were in line with the assumptions made on acquisition, despite international traffic impacted by SARS and the Iraq war. The underlying performance of the assets was crucial to management credibility and to support the strategy of developing a portfolio of airport stakes.

In for the long haul as the mix changes over time

Over the next decade, Macquarie Airports, along with partners (predominantly other Macquarie vehicles), bought a portfolio of airport stakes with positions peaking in assets including Rome Airports (34.2%), Brussels Airport (62.1%) and Copenhagen Airports (53.7%). However, the jewel in the crown, the position in Sydney Airport continued to grow and by the end of December 2011, Macquarie Airports controlled 85% of Sydney Airport and through a series of transactions the position had become the sole asset in the portfolio. The table below sets how the stakes changed through time.

In 2009, after the GFC demonstrated some of the conflicts of externally managed vehicles, the board set out a proposal to pay Macquarie Group $345 million to internalise Macquarie Airports. This was highly controversial, given shareholders could theoretically terminate Macquarie by a majority vote, and alternative proposals were put forward.

However, the board persisted with the plan, arguing the need for Macquarie’s co-operation to avoid triggering change of control and pre-emptive rights clauses in debt facilities and shareholder arrangements. Ultimately the internalisation occurred, with the Chairman at least being forced to acknowledge that there was no legal obligation to pay Macquarie, just a moral obligation.

A very expensive ‘moral’ obligation in our view.

Despite the bumpy path, by the end of the 2013 calendar year, Macquarie Airports had internalised to become Sydney Airport, the business was simplified, a tax dispute settled with the ATO, and ownership of Sydney Airport had moved to 100%. From a share market perspective, simple is good.

Despite early turbulence, the vision was clear

From the early days, the potential upside of airports made for a compelling investment case. Airport ownership provides a myriad of opportunities to invest in commercial activities, particularly via the unregulated retail, car parking and property opportunities, which combined can often represent a greater proportion of airport revenues than aeronautical activities.

With respect to aeronautical activities, the privatisation of Sydney Airport was accompanied by the removal of price controls on aeronautical charges, enabling more flexible arrangements between airlines and the airport allowing for the provision of services to meet the demands of airlines.

Accounting tricks aside, airports require lots of capital and it is often difficult to determine what is regular maintenance capital and what capital is required to grow revenue. However, on acquisition of Sydney Airport, we took comfort that it had been the recipient of lots of capital in the process of getting Sydney and its infrastructure ready to host the Sydney 2000 Olympics.

Another appealing feature of Sydney Airport has always been the monopolistic nature of the asset. In a geography as vast as Australia’s, unlike in Europe, there really is only one way to efficiently travel between major capital cities. This is somewhat supported by the Sydney-Melbourne route being the third most busy airline route in the world.

Furthermore, the only moderate level of future competition was in the form of Western Sydney Airport, where Sydney Airport always had the right of last offer to participate. With light-handed regulation and a focused management team, good things happened.

Aggressive financial structure in the early days

Love it or loath it, Macquarie Airports started life as a complex triple stapled structure that invested in other complex structures, making the accounts opaque and difficult to understand. Couple that with a new asset class and many investors struggled.

In Macquarie Airports’ early days, financial leverage was also considered to be high, particularly for an asset with plenty of operational leverage. The initial Southern Cross Airports Corporation consortium that won the bid for Sydney Airport was aggressively structured as shown in the table below. Less than a third of the capital to fund the acquisition was pure equity.

Correct flight path

In the 2002 calendar year, the company’s cash generation before interest was sufficient to cover its interest bill by 1.2 times. That provides little margin of safety. By contrast, that same ratio was over three times by the end of the 2019 calendar year. The steady improvement in balance sheet strength enabled the company to weather most storms, including the GFC. Only the devastating impact of COVID-19 resulted in an equity issue to bolster the balance sheet.

The decision to focus on Sydney Airport stands the test of time. Based on Phoenix Portfolios calculations, setting aside recent COVID-impacted financials, for the 18 years ending December 2019, Sydney Airport generated a cumulative annual growth rate in revenue of 8.5%, and given margin expansion throughout the period, an EBITDA growth rate of 10.3% per annum.

This didn’t come for free. Phoenix estimates over $5 billion was spent over the last 20 years on various capital projects that have facilitated passenger growth and contributed to the spectacular EBITDA growth. In addition, a further $2 billion of capital was injected into the business by shareholders to cope with the difficulties thrown up by COVID-19. However, offsetting this has been a steady and robust stream of distributions.

Grounded, but ready for take-off again

Sydney Airport has enjoyed some magnificent tailwinds through the last 20 years, which combined with an active management approach has grown EBITDA by 350%. The robustness of the cash flows, along with steadily declining interest rates, has facilitated high multiples when valuing such assets.

On 5 July 2021, Sydney Airport received a proposal from a consortium of infrastructure investors called Sydney Aviation Alliance to acquire, by way of scheme of arrangement and trust scheme, 100% of the stapled securities in Sydney Airport. The Consortium comprised:

  • IFM Investors (Nominees) Limited as trustee for IFM Australian Infrastructure Fund;
  • Conyers Trust Company (Cayman) Limited as trustee for IFM Global Infrastructure Fund;
  • QSuper Board as trustee for QSuper; and
  • Global Infrastructure Management, LLC (on behalf of its managed and advised clients and funds).

This transaction was ultimately consummated on 9 March 2022 with a payment of $8.75 per stapled security. This reflected an Enterprise Value for Sydney Airport of approximately $32 billion.

As shown in the table below, we believe this transaction fully values the asset.

Going forward, Sydney Airport must navigate its way out of the COVID-19 pandemic, deal with potential structural changes to the aviation market, contend with rising interest rates and the opening of Western Sydney Airport. We believe these challenges can be managed but the returns are unlikely to be as robust as the last 20 years.

Phoenix estimates the internal rate of return of an investment in Sydney Airport from the IPO to the sale in March 2022 was approximately 17.9%. By comparison, the S&P/ASX 300 REIT Accumulation Index returned 6.5% over the same period. Since the inception of the Cromwell Phoenix Property Securities Fund, the Sydney Airport holding has delivered an annualised return in excess of the property benchmark by approximately 10%.

 

Stuart Cartledge is Managing Director of Phoenix Portfolios, a boutique investment manager partly owned by staff and partly owned by ASX-listed Cromwell Property Group. Cromwell Funds Management is a sponsor of Firstlinks. This document provides factual information only and does not provide any opinions, advice or recommendation, nor does it consider your personal circumstances.

View the full report here.

 

8 Comments
John C
August 11, 2022

It was a sad day for infrastructure investment choices on the ASX.

Steve
August 11, 2022

A great yarn.

John Xiberras
August 10, 2022

Why our superanuation funds was used to buy out Sydney Airport is a question that I feel needs to be asked. When you have a 100 yr old, curfew restricted, no space for expansion or growth, against Western Sydney Airport with state of the art technology, no curfews, endless room for growth for decades to come. You can only guess where major Airlines will choose as their preferred Airport. Our super funds where used to buy out Sydney Airport at a maximum monopoly price.

C
August 10, 2022

Disagree with John. Sydney Airport will remain by the far the preferred destination for passenger travel due to its vastly better location than Badgery Creek which is over 50km away

C
August 10, 2022

The directors ought to hang their heads in shame for selling out an essential and unique asset off the ASX for such a cheap price, no higher than it was pre COVID. 

John
August 10, 2022

Time will tell, Western Sydney may be 50 km away today, but in 7 yrs or so, it will be central, Western Sydney is being transformed into an economic powerhouse , in which infrastructure is key to this transformation.
All Roads, Rail, etc allow for the best & easiest access too & from WSA, arrivals & departures will run like a Swiss watch,
this is what travellers look for, along with major Airlines.
I also sugessted the ew Aerotropolis City be named after its traditional owners, CABROGAL CITY

David
August 13, 2022

We are the traditional owners, there was no nation, no country and no city before 1901.

David Edwards
August 13, 2022

Absolutely! Why do Directors serially respond to an offer to sell good Aussie companies with good future returns at the merest whisper of a takeover? They roll over like Rover for a tummy-rub!! Bradken, Wotif, Capilano Honey, Greencross, APA (almost, but for government intervention)....all good companies that shareholders and Directors bailed out for a sale price at the bottom of the cycle.

 

Leave a Comment:


RELATED ARTICLES

Pub property: a parma, a pint and a profit

After-tax returns and the value of franking credits

David Harrison on the hot spots in property

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The nuts and bolts of family trusts

There are well over 800,000 family trusts in Australia, controlling more than $3 trillion of assets. Here's a guide on whether a family trust may have a place in your individual investment strategy.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 581 with weekend update

A recent industry event made me realise that a 30 year old investing trend could still have serious legs. Could it eventually pose a threat to two of Australia's biggest companies?

  • 10 October 2024

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

How have so many wealthy families through history managed to squander their fortunes? This looks at the lessons from these families and offers several solutions to making and keeping money over the long-term.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 583

Investing guru Howard Marks says he had two epiphanies while visiting Australia recently: the two major asset classes aren’t what you think they are, and one key decision matters above all else when building portfolios.

  • 24 October 2024

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

A big age gap can make it harder to find a solution that works for both partners – financially and otherwise. Having a frank conversation about the future, and having it as early as possible, is essential.

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

Latest Updates

Risk management

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

Planning

The gentle art of death cleaning

Most of us don't want to think about death. But there is a compelling reason why we do need to plan ahead, and that's because leaving our loved ones with a mess - financial or otherwise - is not how we want them to remember us.

Property

Why has nothing worked to fix Australia's housing mess?

Why has a succession of inquiries and reports, along with a plethora of academic papers, not led to effective action to improve housing affordability? Because the work has been aimless and unsupported by a national consensus.

Investment strategies

How to find big winners in the energy transition

The received wisdom that investors should “take a long-term view” is as well-worn as it is simplistic. Because while the long run matters, when it comes transition materials, there’s also a strong case for a bit of constructive myopia.

Economics

A Nobel Prize for work on why nations succeed and fail

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics has been awarded to three US-based economists who examined the advantages of democracy and the rule of law, and why they are strong in some countries and not others.

Gold

Gold: trustless, rustless, shiny, and tiny

While gold can create divisive views - Buffett called it a valueless pet rock - this assesses its place in portfolios from a supply-demand standpoint and versus currencies. Both angles suggest some exposure to gold is prudent.

Infrastructure

How will the US election impact energy infrastructure?

The US election is not far away and the result will have a key bearing on a host of markets and sectors. Here's a look at the possible ramifications for the global energy infrastructure industry, and the opportunities and risks.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.