Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 144

Death and taxes on your own terms

Benjamin Franklin’s statement that nothing in life is certain but death and taxes remains relevant after 200 years. As a result of an ageing population and increasing household wealth for older generations, Australia faces the largest intergenerational wealth transfer in history in the coming decades. This has significant policy implications, but at a personal level, raises many challenges also. How do we prepare for the inevitable, and do the best for our loved ones?

Facing one’s mortality is rarely an enjoyable or engaging experience. Many would prefer to believe they will live forever, or at least long enough to justify putting off consideration of the implications of their death. Others feel uncomfortable discussing or even thinking about wealth and its implications for their estate. The consequences of a head-in-the-sand approach, however, are often dramatically less benign than the deceased may have presumed. Instead of leaving a secure or empowering legacy, they may bequeath angst, conflict and considerable expense. Feuding families and disappointed potential beneficiaries are a lawyer’s best friend; even those who can amicably settle an estate may still struggle with the cost and administrative burden of a non-existent or ineffective will.

Motivation to address the issue

This is not just thinking or talking about money. It is your legacy to the world and the potential contribution to other people (or the community or the planet) in the future. A vision of the future you would like to create can help to frame a positive outcome from a potentially depressing process. Alternatively, consider that you are simply reducing the future burden on loved ones. If you have a spouse who is refusing to engage, you may need to go it alone and hope that your persistence will motivate them to act. Set a deadline to have your affairs in order, not too far in the future, and stick to it. Make an appointment with an estate planning professional if necessary.

In addressing your estate planning needs, consider both your objectives (what you want to achieve) and your strategy (how you plan to achieve it). While the most perfectly-designed estate plan has little value if it has not been documented, similarly, a perfectly drafted but ill-considered will may not support those who will ultimately rely on it. This article provides a framework for determining your estate planning objectives. Part 2 will consider strategy alternatives, including the structures, professionals and documentation required to ensure your wishes are met.

Estate planning checklist

The amount of time and thinking needed for this process is not the same for everyone: a 40-year-old with young children and a mortgage will plan differently from a 65-year-old who owns their own home and has several million dollars in investments. Similarly, those with complex personal lives, particularly blended families, will have more challenging decisions to make than those with simple affairs.

Here’s a useful framework for your estate planning objectives.

1. Consider all potential eventualities. These include your death (sadly this one’s a certainty), and physical or mental incapacity (such as dementia, long term illness or permanent injury). Many people prepare thoroughly for what will happen on their death, but do not consider a lengthy period of declining mental and physical capacity that may erode capital otherwise intended for their estate, or expose them to unscrupulous individuals. For younger people, injury or illness could have devastating financial consequences. Consider a protection plan for ensuring your needs are met if you no longer have capacity to make your own decisions, and insurance to ensure your dependants are financially secure in the event that you are no longer able to earn an income or due to substantial medical costs. Some of these decisions can be made independently (such as preparing Enduring Powers of Attorney so someone you trust will make decisions if you can’t); others should be considered together (life insurance should form part of your overall estate plan).

2. Ensure your needs are met. Many older people care greatly about providing for their children and grandchildren, and yet may not have considered their own needs for retirement and aged care. This can result in tragic circumstances where the elderly are financially dependent on the age pension and receive little recognition from the children (or others) who have benefitted from an early inheritance. Once an asset has been given away, it is generally the property of the recipient and the giver has renounced their rights to compensation, even if their circumstances change and they now require support. In addition, Centrelink and the Department of Veterans Affairs have specific rules for assessing gifts and other forms of ‘deprivation’ which can result in a reduced social security entitlement for the giver. Have a clear view of what you need to live a comfortable lifestyle, and determine what you can give only once these needs have been met. This doesn’t mean you can’t help others, it simply means taking care to do it prudently, as we will discuss in more detail in Part 2.

3. Consider the legacy you would like to leave. This should speak to your personal values most of all. Your beneficiaries will likely to be top of mind, so identify every person you wish to provide for, as well as those causes that are dear to you. Bill and Melinda Gates, for example, have invested their wealth in charitable programmes and innovations in healthcare and education for developing countries, while leaving a (proportionately) small inheritance for their children. Contrast this with the poor outcomes of ‘trust fund babies’, where children inherit vast fortunes which they are often ill-equipped to manage. For some, a legacy will be as simple as ensuring their grandchildren have a private school education while others may have grander objectives, such as preserving land for environmental causes.

4. Prioritise your objectives. Planning for the ideal scenario on your death may require compromises. Can you achieve all of your objectives with the available resources? If you are eroding your capital during your retirement, you may need to adjust your arrangements over time. It can be challenging providing for your dependants equally when they clearly have different needs. Providing for young children or a child with a disability, for example, is very different to providing for financially secure adult children. Blended families can create significant challenges. Adult children from a first marriage may have lesser needs than young children of a second marriage, but desire an equal share of the estate. They can also resent large bequests to very recent new spouses or partners. Similarly, family businesses can create disparities where one or more children or family members have made different contributions to the business without being adequately compensated or with expectations of receiving a disproportionate share of the business on your death. Finally, one or more children may make a disproportionate contribution to your care if you become physically or mentally incapacitated.

Seek professional advice if you are concerned or your scenario is particularly complex. Succession planners and estate planning experts can give you guidance and assist with counselling and conflict resolution once you choose to engage with potential beneficiaries.

5. Review. While your estate plan is ultimately a reflection of your wishes, the most positive outcomes are likely to occur when all beneficiaries are informed and prepared for what’s to come. Your spouse will preferably be assisting with the process; ideally you will reach a mutually beneficial agreement as to how you’ll look after each other and your children or others. If there are areas of contention, however, it is best to discuss these openly and engage a professional if you’re having trouble reaching agreement (if nothing else, to avoid costly litigation at a later date).

While you are under no obligation to change your plans as a result of other’s concerns or wishes, they may raise legitimate concerns and have alternatives or strategies you hadn’t considered. An informed conversation will also help to keep relationships intact in the future.

Once you have considered your objectives and your legacy, the process of preparing and documenting your estate plan becomes easier.

Part 2 and Part 3 will help you understand the various strategies for achieving your goals and avoiding the pitfalls that can create emotional and financial stress for those you care about.

 

Gemma Dale is the Head of SMSF Solutions at National Australia Bank. This information is general only and does not take into account the personal circumstances or financial objectives of any reader. Readers should consider consulting an estate planning professional before making any decision.

 

  •   25 February 2016
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Planning to make your money last forever

Estate planning: where there’s a will, there’s a way

Planning to make your money live forever

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.