Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 472

Are major bank hybrids really yielding 7%?

Hybrid securities issued by banks have become mainstays of many portfolios, especially those of retirees looking for income. The four major Australian banks plus Macquarie have issues worth almost $40 billion currently listed on the ASX. Hybrid structures have evolved over time but they are complex and idiosyncratic including characteristics of both equities and bonds. They have an ability to absorb losses like equities but pay a defined income like bonds. With income at a tempting 'yield' of 7%, it's important to understand what the number means.

This article is not a primer on hybrids but focusses on why hybrid yields seem strangely high in the current market conditions. Here is an example of recent hybrid pricing on five prominent issues (updated from NAB on 24 August 2022).


The table shows 7% or more 'yield to call' from every major bank plus Macquarie Bank (ASX:MQGPF) at a healthy 7.47%. 

The double-your-money magic 

There is something magical about compounding, as demonstrated by the famous ‘Rule of 72’. Albert Einstein is quoted as describing compound interest as ‘the greatest mathematical discovery of all time’, although this is probably apocryphal. One of the richest bankers in history, Baron Rothschild, described it as the Eighth Wonder of the World. The founder of Vanguard, Jack Bogle, said, ‘Compound interest is a miracle.’

The Rule of 72 is a simplified mathematical construct which provides an approximation of how long it takes to double an investment. Dividing 72 by the rate of interest gives the number of years it takes to double the capital. It's sometimes called the ‘doubling time'. A return of 7% - and heroically assuming interest payments are also reinvested at 7% - doubles an investor’s money in about 10 years in nominal terms (no adjustment for inflation) and ignoring tax.

Why are hybrid yields reported so high?

At first glance, the reported 7%+ returns on hybrids look incorrect. Let’s consider a specific example of one of the more liquid hybrids, NAB Capital Notes 6 (ASX:NABPI), issued with a margin of 3.15% over the 90-day bank bill rate. 

How can a hybrid security with a margin of 3.15% over the bank bill rate of 1.93% (at the time of writing) give a reported yield of around 7%? Shouldn’t it be 3.15%+1.93% equals 5.08%? Moreover, hybrids pay distributions adjusted for the corporate tax rate (requiring the investor to claim the value of the franking credit to gross up the return), so the actual distribution rate is only 3.56%.

Here is a typical calculation in a hybrid distribution report.

BBR: 1.93%
Margin: 3.15%
Total: 5.08%
Multiplied by (1 - tax rate): 0.7
Distribution rate: 3.56%

How do we reconcile the investor receiving 3.56% with the reported yield of around 7%, as in the hybrid pricing reports in our Education Centre?

Let’s look more closely at NABPI. Although many retail investors might feel they missed out on a NABPI allocation due to the Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) preventing access during the offer period, NABPI opened trading at around $98 (for a $100 note) giving easy entry to anybody. It has steadily traded up and is now around 101 giving a neat gain to anyone who bought early on-market.

Price of NAB Capital Notes 6 from issue to 22 August 2022

Source: CommSec

The following screenshot shows how NABPI is summarised in NAB's daily hybrid report. Most columns are self-explanatory, on issue size, issue date, first call date for the issuer, years remaining to call and issue margin.

At the date of the screenshot, the bank bill rate was 1.93% and with the margin of 3.15%, the ‘Current Dividend Rate’ was reported as 5.08% (1.93%+3.15%). The reason the price is above par but the Trading Margin is higher than the yield (which again seems intuitively wrong) is because the Last Price includes accrued interest. So far, so good.

But the question remains. How do we get to 6.77% yield as the headline return?

Reported hybrid yields are based on the future

The 90-day BBSW rate is crucial for the distribution received by hybrid investors, and a rising BBSW leads to higher distributions. The reported margin in the table above allows for the market’s future projection of the 90-day BBSW rate over the life of the note, in the case of NABPI, over 7.4 years.

The 6.77% ‘Yield to Call’ (YTC) is based on the future distributions until the optional redemption date, not the current distribution. Although the option to repay in December 2029 is NAB’s choice, Australian banks are expected to pay on first call as an act of good faith to the market. Banks often rollover to a new issue at the time of first call, giving the market confidence about the term.

NAB (and the entire market) uses an interpolated swap rate, as shown in the chart below. Based on 7.4 years, the swap rate was 3.55%. The YTC figure is the Trading Margin (to call date) plus the swap rate (6.77%=3.22%+3.55%). 

Bank Bill Swap Rates

Source: NAB as at 9 August 2022.

(At the date of final edit of this article on 24 August 2022, the YTC on NABPI was 7.11%, significantly higher than the 6.77% used in this example). 

Is it worth investing in major bank hybrids at 7%?

For income-starved retirees, an investment in a major bank note paying 7% has plenty of appeal. It is not far off the long-term return expected on major bank shares, with considerably less price risk. If inflation is persistent and high, and the Reserve Bank goes harder on cash rates, the bank bill rate may rise higher than anticipated by the current swap curve, at least in the early years. But while the structure gives some protection against this rising inflation, there is always a risk that higher rates will lead to a recession and a need to lower rates, forcing returns below the 7% level.

This floating return is not like buying a fixed rate bond paying 7%. The distribution will rise and fall with short-term rates, and the 7% is only indicated until the 2029 call, not the full 10 years required for a doubling. 

There’s no free lunch in investing, and hybrids come with greater risk than bank deposits. This article is not a full review of hybrid terms, but there is an enormous range of different features, most notably the ability to suspend payments in certain circumstances. Hybrids can also be converted to bank shares during periods of severe difficulty, placing capital at greater risk.

But it's worth understanding how the pricing is calculated and whether investors are paid adequately for the extra risk. The 7% rate depends on the shape of the current yield curve, but these hybrids may deliver a doubling of capital in a decade for the first time on a major Australian bank note for many years.

 

Graham Hand in Editor-At-Large for Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Disclosure, Graham's SMSF holds an investment in NABPI although this is not a recommendation, it is used for illustration purposes only.

 

19 Comments
Richard
March 21, 2023

I wonder how everyone feels about these products post Credit Suisse wiping out hybrid exposure ahead of equity…. pretty outrageous even if technically allowed under the prospectus.

Get Real
September 22, 2022

Bank deposits could be 7% by next year, better to wait for positive real interest rate setting by central banks before locking into anything. Inflation like this has never ever been tamed without positive real central bank rates.

Tony Dillon
August 30, 2022

A timely article Graham, as floating rate notes are a good option in a rising interest rate environment. Because as the coupon rate adjusts when interest rates change, the price stays pretty stable, so there is less chance of loss of capital. The 'yield to call' can be enticing at present but can move around with a lengthy term to call, as projected BBSWs can fluctuate. Perhaps a more immediate metric might be the 'running yield' which is the 'current dividend rate', adjusted for the current security price less accrued interest. And with the NABPI price less interest close to 100 at present, that means a running yield of close to the current dividend rate of 5.08% in your example. Noting, that is a grossed up rate for franking credits. So if investors can make full use of franking credits (in say SMSF pension funds), an after tax return in excess of 5% with interest rate risk largely removed, is a pretty good way to go. Some banks are yielding even higher. ANZPG for example, had a grossed up running yield of 6.3% when I last looked (a coupon margin of 4.7% compared to NABPI 3.15%). Diversifying across the major banks would be an even better way to go.

Jan H
August 27, 2022

Thanks for this article. You confirm why have steered away from Hybrids. Much better to buy the shares directly, and collect the fully-franked dividend. At least, you know where you stand.

Michael Sandy
September 07, 2022

'You confirm why have steered away from Hybrids'...I didn't see an explicit comment from the author, but would be interested in the financial evidence of this

Shiraz
August 25, 2022


Excellent Article and Comments Thankyou
Yes DDO is for the benefit for middle man and it is introduced to discourage individual investors to participate at IPO or to Reinvest.I will still stick with bank Hybrids if you have bank shares have some Hybrids too.

Chris
August 25, 2022

Thanks, now I understand something else. I have wondered why hybrids were quoted at 7% but listed hybrid funds like HBRD and EHF1 report yields below 5%. It's because a fund can only report what it has already earned, but the 7% is based on a future yield curve with much higher rates which have not yet been received. It's an unfair comparison. The funds should add an extra column and show how they will perform based on the current portfolio and yield curve.

Terry
August 24, 2022

Great article , but based on your example with total of 5.08 % in 1st year and a projected 7% in 10th year, then capital will be not doubled. Regardless a well explained article regards

Graham Hand
August 25, 2022

Hi Terry, thanks for your comment but to clarify, the 7% quoted rate does not mean it finally reaches 7% in the 10th year. It is the 'average' of all the 90 day rates plus the margin over the entire period. The 5.08% is based on the current bank bill rate (for 90 days) of 1.93%. The market is saying the bank bill rate will be about 3.85% within a year, by August 2023, not in the 10th year. So 3.85%+3.22% is already 7.07% within a year.

Ian Parker
August 27, 2022

Hi Graham,

Thanks for the article, I compare hybrids with major bank bonds, where you are protected even further against hybrids equity characteristics. I am an "unbeliever" that bank bill rates will get (and continue) as high as 3.85% so have locked in 6% for 5 years with, for example, Macquarie tier 2 bonds. Some will prefer bank shares, I personally prefer investment grade bank bonds, but appreciate many are not available retail, only wholesale thru a bond trader.

Romano Sala Tenna
August 24, 2022

A good piece on my favourite topic

Darryl
August 24, 2022

As the 7% is based upon the market’s future projection of the 90-day BBSW, the only thing we know for sure is that the yield to call will be anything but 7%.

Roland Beil
August 24, 2022

Hi Darryl,
Please explain to me, the difference in trading margins, on the 24/08/2022 the CBAPD,
Firstlink 0.54%
Bondadviser 1.49%
yieldreport 1.61% which one is right ?,
And how is the current divident rate calculated ?
Thank you for your help Roland

Darryl
August 27, 2022

Except for the $100 or so capital return at call, the future cash flows from floating rate securities are not known now, therefore when calculating metrics such as the trading margin some license is required. Say the Hybrid has 5 years to call, some analysts compare the projected cash flows to the five year BBSW. Others will just compare it to 3-month BBSW (which I understand is what Yield Report does).

There may also be other calculation slight differences in what each analyst means by trading margin and this will affect the calculation.

These reports are better as a tool to compare different securities, rather than to try and work out how much income they will provide. For instance you can use the projected yield to call (I prefer yield to call) to look at 2 securities which have similar call dates to see which one should provide the better return over the life of the security.

BeenThereB4
August 24, 2022

Colin, it is not a "game of mates", it is buffoons in Canberra who introduced DDO. I have clients who started investing in hybrids with the "nasty" NABHA's, more than 20 years ago. Typically, they have rolled-over their hybrids to new series with no out of pocket costs (and yes, the broker received a handling fee from issuing bank). Now they are obliged to redeem, and buy new series on market, for which broker earns commision.

Stuart
August 24, 2022

Exactly. The DDO buffoons have added more compliance without adding any value - hence more direct, or indirect, cost to everyone. They need to be held accountable for this.

Frank lanzo
October 24, 2023

My early days investing in hybrids was incuring 1% in and 1% out so really the $100 face coupons was $102.I do not touch any of these products because I think the risk reward factor do not really add up.

Nicholas Chaplin
August 24, 2022

Thanks Graham. It's important to clarify "yield to call" as it is not guaranteed based on yield curves changing over time. However, franking value is real and needs to be absolutely valued here. It will reduce tax paid or deliver a cash rebate for lower tax payers. It can't be ignored.

Colin Edwards
August 24, 2022

New Target Market Determinaton rules for hybrid securities are locking out small investors from taking up direct offers of new issues free of brokerage. You have to be a "sophisticated"or wholesale investor. The rest of us have to buy on the stock market. Looks like a "game of mates" scam to me!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Searching for yield to pay the bills

Stocks don't always beat bonds

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

Avoiding wealth transfer pitfalls

Australia is in the early throes of an intergenerational wealth transfer worth an estimated $3.5 trillion. Here's a case study highlighting some of the challenges with transferring wealth between generations.

Taxpayers betrayed by Future Fund debacle

The Future Fund's original purpose was to meet the unfunded liabilities of Commonwealth defined benefit schemes. These liabilities have ballooned to an estimated $290 billion and taxpayers continue to be treated like fools.

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

Looking beyond banks for dividend income

The Big Four banks have had an extraordinary run and it’s left income investors with a conundrum: to stick with them even though they now offer relatively low dividend yields and limited growth prospects or to look elsewhere.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

Investment strategies

Time to announce the X-factor for 2024

What is the X-factor - the largely unexpected influence that wasn’t thought about when the year began but came from left field to have powerful effects on investment returns - for 2024? It's time to select the winner.

Shares

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

It’s halfway through the 2020s decade and time to get a scorecheck on the Australian stock market. The picture isn't pretty as Aussie shares are having a below-average decade so far, though history shows that all is not lost.

Shares

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Four years ago, we introduced our 'bubbles' chart to show how the market had become concentrated in one type of stock and one view of the future. This looks at what, if anything, has changed, and what it means for investors.

Shares

Is Medibank Private a bargain?

Regulatory tensions have weighed on Medibank's share price though it's unlikely that the government will step in and prop up private hospitals. This creates an opportunity to invest in Australia’s largest health insurer.

Shares

Negative correlations, positive allocations

A nascent theme today is that the inverse correlation between bonds and stocks has returned as inflation and economic growth moderate. This broadens the potential for risk-adjusted returns in multi-asset portfolios.

Retirement

The secret to a good retirement

An Australian anthropologist studying Japanese seniors has come to a counter-intuitive conclusion to what makes for a great retirement: she suggests the seeds may be found in how we approach our working years.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.