Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 320

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 320

  •   19 August 2019
  • 5
  •      
  •   

Most of you have never used a bond price calculator. It may sound boring but inputting a few yields into this simple calculator provided by the ASX is highly instructive. It shows why bond funds have delivered strong returns in the last year and the possible impact of a reversal if rates rise.

Let's check some prices based on the longest Australian Government bond listed. These examples use 1% movements in rates, which are more likely to take months rather than happening quickly:

1. 3% coupon bond matures 21 March 2047. Current price $133.77, current yield 1.55%.
2. Increase the yield by 1% to 2.55%, same bond, price falls to $108.93.
3. Reduce the yield by 1% to 0.55%, same bond, price rises to $162.72.

Rises or falls of 1% are possible. The US President has made 43,600 tweets (as at last night) since he came into office and the next one could move the market. If we had a share price falling from $163 to $133 or $109 the headlines would scream about volatility. This is a bond (admittedly, the long bond exaggerates the outcome) but a $54 fall from $163 is 33%. A bond will pay $100 on maturity but it can be quite a ride in the meantime, as Warren Bird explained.

If you think 28 years to 2047 is a long time, the US Treasury is canvassing investor appetite for a 100-year bond. Austria issued a 'century' bond in 2017 with a coupon of 2.1% and the yield is now 0.66%, with the price over $200. Who said bonds were boring or riskless?!

It's fun to try inputting a negative yield (and thanks to Peter Morgan for this example).

That's a relief! The ASX says yields cannot go negative. They should tell the Reserve Bank to stop lowering rates or the ASX will need to fix their model. Around the world, almost US$17 trillion of bonds offer negative yields (Source: Bloomberg) from only US$6 trillion less than a year ago.

In this week's edition ...

Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are a major factor in the changing landscape of investing, driven by the low cost of indexing and easy access via the listed market. In our continuing Interview Series, Alex Vynokur maps these developments, including in the active and thematic forms, and gives pointers to the ways investing will continue to change.

On the theme of change, Jeremy Podger describes six major themes which will have major impacts on markets in coming years, and Vivek Bommi explains three types of fixed interest alternatives as investors struggle with 1% cash and term deposit rates.

We then have two articles on investor behaviour. Julian Morrison warns investors not to think activity is the best way to invest, while Erica Hall cites research showing many retirees are too frugal and cautious in their desire not to run out of money.

There has been considerable media coverage of the Mercer versus Grattan debate about super and living standards in retirement, and we show both sides of the debate. It's hard to argue that someone earning less than the tax-free threshold of $18,200 who pays 15% tax in super is benefitting from the system as much as someone with a marginal tax rate of 45%.

This week's White Paper from NAB/nabtrade reports on the key findings from their recent seminar on fixed income trends.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 

5 Comments
John
August 22, 2019

A very appreciative regular reader wishes to thank Cuffelinks for applying the print function to written articles.

Chris D
August 21, 2019

I love those opening comments Graham.

My gut feel is, you’d be surprised how many people don’t understand the relationship between bond price and rate.

Warren Bird
August 21, 2019

Perhaps Chris D, but my observation (based upon a couple of decades of presenting to audiences on the topic) is that there are more that understand that relationship than those who understand the way bond returns work over the life of the asset. As a result they get far too worried about short term volatility and forget about income, which increases as yields rise provided you either reinvest coupon interest or you own a portfolio of bonds that have maturities to reinvest.

Graham's article is a good lesson in short term volatility, which is a reality of investing in long term fixed income. But I know that Graham also realises that it's not the whole story either, hence his link to my article on the life of a bond.

And in response to James' comment about bond returns being 'assymetric', I don't know that Graham's article actually says that. In the short term, when capital value fluctuations dominate, they're symmetric. Yields up or down, the price change is going to be the duration of the bond times that change. (OK, for pedants like me, if it's a big yield change then it's not exactly symmetric because of convexity, but it's of the right order of magnitude.)

Where bond returns are asymetric is over the long run where they're biased on the upside, because you always have the positive impact of interest income dominating. Well, I suppose negative bond yields make the return assymetric on the downside, but the point is that the yield to maturity is always very close to the total return over the life of the bond. Those symmetric price fluctuations end up washing out by the maturity date of each asset.

James
August 21, 2019

Nice work on bonds, Graham – good for people to realise how asymmetric bond returns can be.

Warren Bird
August 21, 2019

Personally, I think that the case for investing in fixed income (bonds) with a duration as long as that of equities presumes that you reinvest your income payments so that you get the benefits of compounding. That way, if yields increase after you make the investment, you'll be investing a lot of cash flows back into your portfolio at those higher yields, thus ratcheting the return up well beyond the initial purchase yield.

Unfortunately that ASX calculator - like so much of the bond information that a stock market provider like the ASX gives us - is only a snapshot of 'what if' scenarios at today's date. It doesn't show you how the investment might perform over it's entire life under different assumptions about reinvestment and the future path of the yield at which you make reinvestments. It therefore encourages overemphasis on the price change from a shift in yields as if that was an instantaneous outcome. Graham's example of a 1% change in yields is simply not going to happen in a day, especially on a long term bond. The longer the time period over which the change happens, the more important income accrual and reinvestment become in the final outcome and the less important is the change in price.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Five months on from cancer diagnosis

Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.

Uncomfortable truths: The real cost of living in retirement

How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.

Is Australia ready for its population growth over the next decade?

Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise. 

The public servants demanding $3m super tax exemption

The $3 million super tax will capture retired, and soon to retire, public servants and politicians who are members of defined benefit superannuation schemes. Lobbying efforts for exemptions to the tax are intensifying.

20 US stocks to buy and hold forever

Recently, I compiled a list of ASX stocks that you could buy and hold forever. Here’s a follow-up list of US stocks that you could own indefinitely, including well-known names like Microsoft, as well as lesser-known gems.

The challenges of retirement aren’t just financial

Debates about retirement tend to focus on the financial aspects: income, tax, estates, wills, and the like. Less attention is paid to the psychological challenges of retirement, which can often be more demanding.

Latest Updates

Shares

Are term deposits attractive right now?

If you’re like me, you may have put money into term deposits over the past year and it’s time to decide whether to roll them over or look elsewhere. Here are the pros and cons of cash versus other assets right now.

Retirement

How retiree spending plummets as we age

There's been little debate on how spending changes as people progress through retirement. Yet, it's a critical issue as it can have a significant impact on the level of savings required at the point of retirement.

Estate planning made simple, Part I

Every year, milions of dollars are spent on legal fees, and thousands of hours are wasted on family disputes - all because of poor estate planning. Here's a guide to a key part of estate planning - making an effective will.

Investment strategies

Markets are about to get a whole lot harder

As the world shifts away from one of artificially suppressed interest rates and cheap manufacturing, investors will need to carefully consider how companies are positioned to navigate the new higher-cost paradigm.

Investment strategies

Why commodities deserve a place in portfolios

2024 looks set to be another year of reflation and geopolitical uncertainty — with the latter significantly raising the tail risk of a return to problematic inflation. That’s a supportive backdrop for commodities.

Property

What’s next for Australian commercial real estate?

It's no secret that Australian commercial property has endured its most challenging period since the GFC. Yet, there are encouraging signs that the worst may be over and industry returns should improve in the medium term.

Shares

Board games: two hidden risks for stock pickers?

Allan Gray's Simon Mawhinney thinks two groups with huge influence over our public companies often fall short of helping shareholders. In this interview, Mawhinney also talks boards, takeovers, and active investing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.