Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 487

Why emerging markets have reached an inflexion point

Emerging market indices have performed poorly over the past 10 years. Economic growth in these markets started to stall even before Covid and that prompted many investors to head for the exits.

But the decade-long sell-off has led to attractive valuations at a time when a commodity super-cycle could pave the way for outperformance.

Transition metals and emerging markets

A major theme in recent years is decarbonisation. Major economies are beginning to wean themselves off fossil fuels and are looking for new ways to curb emissions, with many aiming to achieve net zero between 2030 and 2050.

By current estimates, US$56 trillion in incremental infrastructure investment is needed to meet net zero by 2050. This implies an average investment of US$1.9 trillion annually.

Central to achieving these emission targets will be transitioning our existing energy infrastructure to cleaner fuel sources, which places many emerging market nations in an enviable position.

That’s because the transition away from fossil fuels is likely to be metal intensive. Replacing existing fuel sources with renewable electricity and manufacturing batteries to store this power will require large volumes of metals such as copper, lithium, and rare earth elements.

Where are we going to find those metals? There's a little bit in Australia and there's a little bit in Canada, but the vast bulk of new metal discoveries we're going to need to make will be in Africa or South America.

Demand for these metals could begin to outpace supply, creating bottlenecks and price hikes – all to the benefit of producing nations. The scarcity of these resources also places significant power into the hands of local governments to raise tax revenues.

Peru and Chile, collectively producing 35% of global copper, provide a good example of this. However, neither Peru nor Chile are comfortable places to put more money. It costs billions of dollars to invest there.

If you’re Glencore or Goldfield – who are commissioning to put US$2 billion, US$3 billion or US$4 billion into each hole in the ground in Chile - they have to sit down with President Boric and say, ‘what's my royalty rate?’, ‘what's the taxation rate?’ And the threat of expropriation is high.

While this does present risks to producers, I believe that these risks have been priced in.

Attractive valuations versus developed markets

The demand for metals is expected to support the growth of emerging markets and widen the real GDP growth differential with western markets. This marks forward price-to-earning (P/E) ratios for the sector look attractive.

In part, this is attributable to the commitment of emerging nations to maintain tight monetary policy over the past decade. These economies have largely avoided using unconventional policies (such as quantitative easing). They also raised rates before developed economies – and remain ahead of the curve.

As developed economies struggle with soaring inflation and interest rates, monetary constraint has made emerging market economies resilient.

Attractive emerging markets forward price to earnings ratios

Emerging markets have fallen to valuation levels not seen since 2008 while earnings continue to climb.

Yet despite attractive valuations, international capital flows into emerging markets are close to record lows. Since the early 1990s, buying emerging markets at times when most investors are selling has proven to be a successful strategy.

Investor capital has exited emerging markets creating contrarian opportunities

*Korea, Taiwan, India, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, Turkey. Source: CLSA, National Stock Exchanges, WFE as at 20 October 2022. The forecasts and estimates are based upon subjective assumptions about circumstances and events that may not yet have taken place and may never do so. The information shown above is for illustrative purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be, interpreted as recommendations or advice.

History may repeat

If I had told you back in 2002 to buy emerging markets, you would've thought I was mad. Emerging markets had been through an incredibly difficult crisis. The Indonesian economy had collapsed in 1997. The rupee went from 2,000 to the US dollar to 18,000 to the US dollar in the space of six months. The Thai baht collapsed. The Korean won collapsed.

But emerging markets did exactly what we thought they were going to do. Emerging market GDP grew. The emerging market growth story worked. China raised 750 million people out of poverty. Indonesia’s GDP has gone from US$200 billion to US$1.1 trillion. India is now a larger economy than the UK.

With that context in mind, the emerging market selloff could represent a good entry point for investors.

 

James Johnstone is Co-Head of Emerging & Frontier Markets at Redwheel, a Channel Capital partner. Access to the RWC Global Emerging Markets Fund is available to Australian investors via Channel Capital, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers from Channel Capital and partners, click here.

 

  •   7 December 2022
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Four reasons emerging markets should outperform post-COVID

What to watch in post-pandemic 2021

Brazil on the eve of the World Cup

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, 2025 edition

Two years ago, I wrote an article suggesting that the odds favoured ASX shares easily outperforming residential property over the next decade. Here’s an update on where things stand today.

Building a lazy ETF portfolio in 2026

What are the best ways to build a simple portfolio from scratch? I’ve addressed this issue before but think it’s worth revisiting given markets and the world have since changed, throwing up new challenges and things to consider.

Get set for a bumpy 2026

At this time last year, I forecast that 2025 would likely be a positive year given strong economic prospects and disinflation. The outlook for this year is less clear cut and here is what investors should do.

Meg on SMSFs: First glimpse of revised Division 296 tax

Treasury has released draft legislation for a new version of the controversial $3 million super tax. It's a significant improvement on the original proposal but there are some stings in the tail.

Property versus shares - a practical guide for investors

I’ve been comparing property and shares for decades and while both have their place, the differences are stark. When tax, costs, and liquidity are weighed, property looks less compelling than its reputation suggests.

10 fearless forecasts for 2026

The predictions include dividends will outstrip growth as a source of Australian equity returns, US market performance will be underwhelming, while US government bonds will beat gold.

Latest Updates

Economy

Ray Dalio on 2025’s real story, Trump, and what’s next

The renowned investor says 2025’s real story wasn’t AI or US stocks but the shift away from American assets and a collapse in the value of money. And he outlines how to best position portfolios for what’s ahead.

Superannuation

No, Division 296 does not tax franking credits twice

Claims that Division 296 double-taxes franking credits misunderstand imputation: franking credits are SMSF income, not company tax, and ensure earnings are taxed once at the correct rate.

Investment strategies

Who will get left holding the banks?

For the first time in decades, the Big 4 banks have real competition in home loans. Macquarie is quickly gain market share, which threatens both the earnings and dividends of the major banks in the years ahead.

Investment strategies

AI economic scenarios: revolutionary growth, or recessionary bubble?

Investor focus is turning increasingly to AI-related risks: is it a bubble about to burst, tipping the US into recession? Or is it the onset of a third industrial revolution? And what would either scenario mean for markets?

Investment strategies

The long-term case for compounders

Cyclical stocks surge in upswings but falter in downturns. Compounders - reliable, scalable, resilient businesses - offer smoother, superior returns over the full investment cycle for patient investors.

Property

AREITs are not as passive as you may think

A-REITs are often viewed as passive rental vehicles, but today’s index tells a different story. Development and funds management now dominate earnings, materially increasing volatility and risk for the sector.

Australia’s quiet dairy boom — and the investment opportunity

Dairy farming offers real asset exposure, steady income and long-term growth, yet remains overlooked by investors seeking diversification beyond traditional asset classes.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.