Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 183

The impact of bond rates on asset valuations

Yields on long-term bonds issued by many developed nations, including Australia, have declined significantly since about 2008. In Australia, 10-year Government bond yields have fallen from 5.8% in 2008 to the current rate of about 2.7%. In October 2016, the Government issued a 30-year bond at a yield of about 3.3%. These low yields are also evident in the overnight cash rates, currently at an historically low 1.50%. Compared with long-term historical averages, these yields reflect a number of factors including quantitative easing and the intervention of central banks, reduced public sector investment, strong investor demand for low-risk quality assets such as government bonds, and lower long-term growth and inflation expectations.

Historical Yields of 10-year Government bonds and ASX All Ordinaries Index performance


Click to enlarge. Source: RBA, Capital IQ

Impact of low bond rates

In valuing assets, the income approach is often applied, using the discounted cash flow methodology. This effectively requires forecasting future cash flows from the asset, which are then discounted to present value at a rate that reflects the time value of money and riskiness of the cash flows. The discount rate applied in this method is usually a blend of the cost of debt and the cost of equity in the relevant sector, based on the market-average level of gearing.

One of the key inputs to the discount rate is the cost of equity. This is commonly derived by adding a premium to the ‘risk-free’ rate to reflect the excess return required on equity investments and the proportion of that premium applicable to the asset. The link between government bond yields and valuation is due to the common practice of basing ‘risk-free’ rates on long-term government bond yields, the best observable proxy for a riskless asset. All else being equal, lower yields on ‘risk-free’ assets would result in a lower discount rate, and therefore an uplift in value. However, while expected returns on risk-free investments have fallen over the past few years, the market is not pricing in a direct corresponding increase in the value of equities.

Looking at the performance of the ASX All Ordinaries Index since 2008 (as shown in the chart above), there has been significant volatility. Yet the share prices of ASX All Ordinaries companies have generally risen over the same period. Some of the factors driving share prices up, despite the low-growth environment, include:

  • As overnight cash rates have fallen, companies having taken advantage of lower borrowing costs
  • Debt levels have generally fallen across the market, arguably strengthening balance sheets
  • The low growth environment has highlighted the need for strong management focus on long-term cost savings and efficiencies, as well as innovation and technology developments
  • Investor demand for defensive or lower risk assets
  • Falling yield expectations from investors
  • Achieving real growth through acquisitions, offering the potential for growth and scale/cost savings.

However, on average, share price rises have been less than the direct impact of the lower risk-free rate on discount rates. In fact, total shareholder returns, calculated as share price growth plus dividends, have fallen in recent years, with average returns of 5.9% over the three years to October 2016, lower than the average returns for the past 10 years (10.3%) and 15 years (8.4%).

ASX All Ordinaries Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance


Click to enlarge. Source: Capital IQ

Other factors than low bond rates reflected in share prices

So, while on average share prices have risen in recent years, the market is arguably not fully reflecting the fall in government bond rates in equity prices. Other factors must be in play.

Many valuation professionals consider the impact on valuations of the current lower yields by:

  • Critically examining the expected future cash flows to ensure they reflect lower long-term growth and inflation expectations
  • Considering the impact of volatility and expected returns in assessing equity market risk
  • Using a blend of current actual rates, historical averages and views on longer-term investment yields.

Valuers may also form a view on a ‘normalised’ long-term yield for a ‘risk-free’ asset allowing for the long-term history of Australian Government bond yields, fundamental real return expectations, inflation forecasts and implied equity market returns. This has generally resulted in an additional risk premium being applied, over and above the current bond rates, in assessing an appropriate cost of equity and overall discount rates.

While there is no consensus on the correct approach, most equity analysts apply some form of adjustment in assessing their discount rates. These will likely unwind as and when government bond rates increase. Ultimately, the reasonableness check on values for investors is the earnings multiples implied by companies trading on the stock exchange and prices paid in recent transactions.

 

Julie Wolstenholme is a Partner in EY Australia Transaction Advisory Services. The views expressed in this article are the views of the author, not Ernst & Young. The article provides general information, does not constitute advice and should not be relied on as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

  •   24 November 2016
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Why it’s time to ditch the retirement journey

Retirement isn’t a clean financial arc. Income shocks, health costs and family pressures hit at random, exposing the limits of age-based planning and the myth of a predictable “retirement journey".

The housing market is heading into choppy waters

With rates on hold and housing demand strong, lenders are pushing boundaries. As risky products return, borrowers should be cautious and not let clever marketing cloud their judgment.

Latest Updates

Interviews

AFIC on the speculative ASX boom, opportunities, and LIC discounts

In an interview with Firstlinks, CEO Mark Freeman discusses how speculative ASX stocks have crushed blue chips this year, companies he likes now, and why he’s confident AFIC’s NTA discount will close.

Investment strategies

Solving the Australian equities conundrum

The ASX's performance this year has again highlighted a persistent riddle facing investors – how to approach an index reliant on a few sectors and handful of stocks. Here are some ideas on how to build a durable portfolio.

Retirement

Regulators warn super funds to lift retirement focus

Despite three years under the retirement income covenant, regulators warn a growing gap between leading and lagging super funds, driven by poor member insights and patchy outcomes measurement.

Shares

Australian equities: a tale of two markets

The ASX seems a market split in two: between the haves and have nots; or those with growth and momentum and those without. In this environment, opportunity favours those willing to look beyond the obvious.

Investment strategies

Dotcom on steroids Part II

OpenAI’s business model isn't sustainable in the long run. If markets catch on, the company could face higher borrowing costs, or worse, and that would have major spillover effects.

Investment strategies

AI’s debt binge draws European telco parallels

‘Hyperscalers’ including Google, Meta and Microsoft are fuelling an unprecedented surge in equity and debt issuance to bankroll massive AI-driven capital expenditure. History shows this isn't without risk.

Investment strategies

Leveraged single stock ETFs don't work as advertised

Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver some multiple of an underlying index or reference asset’s return over a day. Yet, they aren’t even delivering the target return on an average day as they’re meant to do.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.