Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 524

Investing for generations

Some time ago, a reader suggested I should do a post on investing for immortals. This was triggered by the prediction of one futurist that by 2030, nanobots will help humans become immortal. I doubt that humans will become immortal by then, but the question is an interesting one to ponder. So here we go.

The investment community has thought about ultra-long-term investing for a long time. Endowments and Sovereign Wealth Funds have an expected life of hundreds of years, so for them, intergenerational investing is a real issue. And the solutions we have come up with are things like the Endowment Portfolio that makes use of the risk premia achievable in alternative and illiquid asset classes. Other famous approaches are Harry Browne’s Permanent Portfolio and the All-Weather Portfolio of Bridgewater.

Constructing a portfolio for immortals

But let’s assume I was immortal. How would I go about constructing an investment portfolio?

Most importantly, I would go back to first principles wherever possible. And the most important one of them is to not make forecasts, or to make only very limited forecasts.

Think about how bad our forecasts are for the near future. Now think about how badly wrong we are going to be in the long run if these small mistakes don’t cancel out but accumulate and reinforce them. Think back 100 or 1,000 years and the world people lived in then. For them, our world today would have been completely unfathomable. Similarly, it is impossible to forecast how our world will look like in 100 or 1,000 years. Whatever forecast we make is going to be way off, which is why I have made it a habit to ignore futurists and their predictions.

Yet, the task we have is to figure out how to invest for that time frame.

And this is where the Copernican Principle comes in. I have written a post explaining this important but not well-known concept in some detail. But the short version is that if you want to know how long something will be around before it ceases to exist, a good starting point is to assume that you are witnessing it at a random point in time. You are much less likely to encounter something at the beginning of your life or at the end of your life than somewhere in the middle. In other words, you are not special in the sense that right now, right here, you witness the beginning of a new era (say with cryptocurrencies as a new form of money that will replace all other forms of money in the future) or the end of an era (say with the end of economic progress and the beginning of a no growth world).

If you think through all that (and in the article linked above I do just that) you find that things that have been around for a very long time are much more likely to be around for much longer into the distant future than things that only have been around for a few years or decades.

Key guidelines for the portfolio

Combining the Copernican Principle with only very defensive forecasts leads me to the following guiding principles for my investments:

1. Bet on humans being humans. Any investment that exploits behavioural biases and mental shortcuts is likely to work not just today and tomorrow but as long as humans are around. Yes, it is possible that technologies will make us more rational over time or eliminate the influence of human biases but even with AI, it seems that it is exhibiting similar biases as humans do.

The two investment techniques that I think are almost entirely based on exploiting human biases to their advantage are momentum investing and value investing. Coincidentally, these are also the two investment styles that seem to be much more robust against data mining than all the other factors that have been described. Yes, there is increasing evidence that value investing does not work in a low interest rate world or has stopped working for some other reason, but because I want to be very defensive, I will give value the benefit of the doubt and use value and momentum as my two ways to manage the portfolio. I think momentum is going to work because people will always be greedy and try to jump onto investments that have gone up in the past, hoping that they will continue to go up in the future. And value is going to work because when assets have been dropping in value a lot, most people will be fearful of these assets, providing opportunities to investors willing to pick up good investments at bargain prices.

2. I will rely on the forecast that technological progress will never stop. No matter what problem we face, humans will find a solution. That, in my view, is a pretty easy forecast to make because if we ever encounter an existential problem that we can’t solve then – well – so much for immortality. Thus, I am not going to invest for a world after the nuclear holocaust or a world where we won’t find a way to cope with climate change, or where AI kills us all. That would be pointless. Instead, I assume that being immortal implies that I am not going to die of natural causes, but it is still possible to kill me by shooting me with a gun.

But if I believe in technological progress to continue, then I want to invest in human creativity which is the driving force behind technological progress. And the simplest (and in my view best) way to do that is to invest in businesses. Hence, I do want to invest in listed equity and private equity. This way, I become a part owner of the business and benefit from the ingenuity of the people who work at these businesses and solve the challenges of the day.

3. I want to invest in stuff that I can use as a medium of exchange that is liquid and relatively safe. Being immortal does not mean that I will be alone. I will always have to rely on other people to get food, shelter, and other stuff. So, I need ‘money’ and liquid assets I can tap into whenever there is an unexpected need for cash.

This one is where the Copernican Principle helps a lot. The longest existing forms of ‘money’ are gold and cash issued by governments. So, I want to hold a diversified collection of gold and a variety of cash in different currencies. But because I have no idea if the Dollar or gold will survive or the Chinese Renminbi, etc. I will simply make no forecast on any specific form of money and hold each in equal measure.

And I think that’s about it.

In the end, it seems I would essentially invest in listed equity, private equity, and ‘cash’. And because I cannot predict which one is going to perform better or worse, I would put the same amount of money in each of these three buckets.

Within equities, I would probably split it 50/50 into a value and a momentum portfolio and within each of these portfolios, I would hold equal amounts in each stock. Within private equity, I would invest in as many different businesses as I can and put the same amount of money in each investment, just like I would put the same amount of money into each currency and gold.

But some investments would not be part of my portfolio for immortals: bonds, real estate, hedge funds, art, crypto, etc.

The reason for all of these is pretty much the same. I don’t know if they will still be around in a couple of hundred or thousand years. We might no longer need houses or buildings to live in and all forms of bonds and loans may long have been eaten by inflation or abolished in favour of other forms of financing. And crypto? Well, come back in a couple of thousand years to discuss that.

 

Joachim Klement is an investment strategist based in London. This article contains the opinion of the author. As such, it should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of the author’s employer. Republished with permission from Klement on Investing.

 

4 Comments
Kevin
September 05, 2023

I've never done anything that I am supposed to do.What the smart money does etc,important to rebalance and so on.
Diversification is the only free lunch,on and on and on.Must find the next big thing!!
Reinvesting dividends over a long term I go for a 12%.CAGR.

The good and the bad,CBA and NAB. $6 each, way back when. Buy 1000 in each of them so spend $12K.Leave them alone to compound for 32 years and they are worth $450K.Fortunately CBA is worth $600K on their own,with NAB being the wayward child..Around $750K together.
Wesfarmers and Macbank behind them for just in case. I do have a Lend Lease of course after the wonderful days of Dick Dusseldorp and Stuart Hornery.

If you don't want to pick individual companies and realise that 3 or 4 that fire out of 12 to 14 will produce excellent results,then buy a low cost index fund.Every day is a step into the dark Stick to the plan and it should go well.When good companies go bad,get out..

Thinking in terms of 100 years is easy,the problem is somebody is going to think ,it must be better if it is more complicated.That can't be right or everybody else would be doing that.

The hardest thing to see is the obvious that is right in front of your nose.

Dudley
September 06, 2023

"Around $750K together.": Age Pension Asset Test full pension: A couple, combined Homeowner $451,500, Non-homeowner $693,500. Perfect touchdown.

Lyn
September 04, 2023

Interesting article, and comment by Mark re long-term for future generation. Each generation has similar goal for 'safe' investing in providers of human needs and found in which stands test of time surviving adverse conditions at random times and only time proves. I had reason today to ponder what my grandfather may have said in 1950's and wishing I'd been old enough then to have discussion to know thoughts which may have made thoughts clearer but eventually took an available route as knew what my mother would have decided, the point is that 3 generations behaved similarly over 160years so perhaps Joachim is right to bet on humans being humans.
Disagree when people say wealth shouldn't be passed on as if take wealth out of market in great swathes triggered by some anomaly what will then happen to market, yet here I am 160yrs on and in some way trying to do what Joachim refers to for liquidity now and the unknown future with what were punts in the dark 160yrs, 100yrs and 50yrs ago covering Industrial revolution, the Depression, 2 world wars and lots in between without access to the information we can get today. Sadly, 100yr old one winding up before costs eat assets, not kept up with times despite suggestion 10yrs ago to aging board to appoint younger board to stay alive in changing technology and to invest more diversely, 80yr olds hung on refusing to enrol next generation. Must have thought immortal or to imitate a 99yr old Chair who amazingly did manage to keep up until his death but he exceptional.
This article made me revisit what I recalled of family businesses of more than 300yrs old in UK's The Telegraph, www.telegraph.co.uk Barclays and Twinings don't make the cut although more than 300yrs old as companies & not family business, it's an interesting read of those which did. Called Tercentenarian Club. Love idea of a church complaining about crack in a bell after installed perhaps 100 yrs, wonder if get new bell if ever happens, somehow think it might if firm believes has 50yrs to recoup expense. Incredibly, 400yr old firm of builders made the list which should make it an immortal investment but not possible as family business.

Mark Hayden
August 31, 2023

I agree with some views above but not others - eg the weightings. My view is there are a lot more ultra-long-term investors than commentators and experts realise. For example, a large percentage of investors want some funds to still be in their bucket when they kick the bucket. Such funds will go to future generations and in many cases can be considered truly long-term. I welcome articles such as Joachim's.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

What's unique about private equity?

Even Warren Buffett lost his edge 20 years ago

The BIG picture: portfolios perform for the passive and patient

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

Avoiding wealth transfer pitfalls

Australia is in the early throes of an intergenerational wealth transfer worth an estimated $3.5 trillion. Here's a case study highlighting some of the challenges with transferring wealth between generations.

Taxpayers betrayed by Future Fund debacle

The Future Fund's original purpose was to meet the unfunded liabilities of Commonwealth defined benefit schemes. These liabilities have ballooned to an estimated $290 billion and taxpayers continue to be treated like fools.

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

Looking beyond banks for dividend income

The Big Four banks have had an extraordinary run and it’s left income investors with a conundrum: to stick with them even though they now offer relatively low dividend yields and limited growth prospects or to look elsewhere.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

Investment strategies

Time to announce the X-factor for 2024

What is the X-factor - the largely unexpected influence that wasn’t thought about when the year began but came from left field to have powerful effects on investment returns - for 2024? It's time to select the winner.

Shares

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

It’s halfway through the 2020s decade and time to get a scorecheck on the Australian stock market. The picture isn't pretty as Aussie shares are having a below-average decade so far, though history shows that all is not lost.

Shares

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Four years ago, we introduced our 'bubbles' chart to show how the market had become concentrated in one type of stock and one view of the future. This looks at what, if anything, has changed, and what it means for investors.

Shares

Is Medibank Private a bargain?

Regulatory tensions have weighed on Medibank's share price though it's unlikely that the government will step in and prop up private hospitals. This creates an opportunity to invest in Australia’s largest health insurer.

Shares

Negative correlations, positive allocations

A nascent theme today is that the inverse correlation between bonds and stocks has returned as inflation and economic growth moderate. This broadens the potential for risk-adjusted returns in multi-asset portfolios.

Retirement

The secret to a good retirement

An Australian anthropologist studying Japanese seniors has come to a counter-intuitive conclusion to what makes for a great retirement: she suggests the seeds may be found in how we approach our working years.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.