Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 171

Business and social lessons learnt from 'jumping ship'

Introduction from Cuffelinks founder, Chris Cuffe

I left a full-time business career not quite knowing ‘what was next’ and met Michael Traill at the front of that journey. He changed my life. He has just released a book about that journey called 'Jumping Ship – from the world of corporate Australia to the heart of social investment'. His inspiring personal and professional story connects his work at Social Ventures Australia and his energy, vision and tenacity to make Goodstart Early Learning the reality and powerhouse it is today. As well as the intriguing Goodstart story, the book is a practical primer for anyone who is serious about ‘jumping ship’ and those who care about how we can improve social outcomes in the Australia of today.

We asked Michael to share key themes from the book and his personal motives in writing it. In particular, as someone who is widely regarded as a driver of the impact investing market in Australia, what potential does he feel this early stage market has to become more mainstream?

I wrote Jumping Ship for two reasons. Firstly, it’s a shortcut. I am frequently asked, “Why did you jump ship after 15 years at Macquarie Bank to work in the social sector?”.

Secondly, I wanted to share what I learnt in the 15 years since I ‘jumped ship’ to highlight that practical partnership solutions which use business disciplines for social purposes are making a real difference.

Avoiding the cycle of poor education and opportunity

My motive for Jumping Ship was driven by growing up in a country town community which would now be regarded as a 'postcode of disadvantage'. Courtesy of the strong values placed on education by my parents and especially my school teacher father, my brother and I were both motivated to take advantage of the educational opportunities we had. But we know talented and capable school peers who didn’t, mostly because the school or the families and community around them didn’t expect them to do well.

The data highlights Australia still has a big divide between those who are trapped in a cycle of poor education and opportunity and those who are not. Despite many genuine attempts by government and non-profits, not enough has changed to shift that data. It outrages me morally that students in those bottom 20% of postcodes are on average two to two-and-a-half years behind their peers in the top 20% by the age of 15 on standard education performance measures. That’s obviously a major economic and productivity issue for Australia.

I reached a point where I felt a strong urge to see if I could use whatever business and professional skills I had acquired in a 20-year career to do something constructive about that issue. The greatly respected social commentator Hugh Mackay, who kindly wrote a foreword for my book, explains better than anyone the reason for wanting that itch to be scratched. He talks about a group of 'affluent purpose seekers' – people who have done well professionally and financially but are looking for ways to engage more meaningfully around family and community. My experience is that there are many who want to have a serious conversation about how they can use their business and professional skills to make a tangible community contribution.

Using business principles for social purpose

At the heart of the work of Social Ventures Australia (SVA), where I spent 12 years as founding Chief Executive, and the $900 million Goodstart Early Learning social enterprise which I chair, is the belief that we can make a significant practical difference by applying business disciplines for social purpose. What I found in that journey is that there are many outstanding people who want to be part of that. Chris Cuffe was an exemplar of this and he made a transformational difference in a three-year period as Executive Director at SVA.

In the work at SVA, Goodstart has received significant profile because of the scale of the enterprise. As Australia’s largest early learning chain, with 644 centres nationally and over 69,600 children attending, it is one of the largest social enterprises in the world. When the deal was put together six years ago, there were many cynics who thought the idea that it could be run in a financially disciplined way and achieve social purpose objectives was nonsense. The cynics have been proved wrong. The investors who committed subordinated debt, so the Goodstart syndicate of four non-profit partners could fund the purchase of the bankrupted ABC Childcare centres, were paid a 12% annual coupon and had their debt fully repaid two years ahead of schedule in 2015.

That six-year journey has also seen substantial investment in critical areas of quality and social purpose, furnished by the solid financial performance of the business. The number of degree-qualified early learning teachers has increased more than fourfold to over 850. There has also been significant investment in improved professional development and specialist support resources to assist the particular needs of over 130 centres located in the bottom 30% of postcodes.

Support needed from superannuation trustees

There has been a lot of conversation about how deals like Goodstart – so-called impact investing transactions with a combination of reasonable financial returns and social purpose outcomes – can become more mainstream. I believe there is enormous potential for this to happen but we have a long way to go. Superannuation fund investors and trustees in particular need convincing that such transactions satisfy the twin test of being of sufficient scale and offering returns that would pass reasonable risk/return hurdles expected by their investment committees.

The current market is quite fragmented. SVA has been a market leader, and was behind the country’s first social benefit bonds, as well as running a $10 million social impact fund and a $30 million commitment from industry fund HESTA. Most of these investments are relatively small scale, as yet. For the opportunity to accelerate, there is a real need for large-scale investments that can deploy capital in amounts which are meaningful for the multibillion-dollar industry and super funds. My belief is that these will happen and will offer the infrastructure type returns (8–12%) that are already being demonstrated in the examples above.

 

Jumping Ship by Michael Traill is published by Hardie Grant and available online and at bookstores. See www.jumpingship.com.au.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.