Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 171

Business and social lessons learnt from 'jumping ship'

Introduction from Cuffelinks founder, Chris Cuffe

I left a full-time business career not quite knowing ‘what was next’ and met Michael Traill at the front of that journey. He changed my life. He has just released a book about that journey called 'Jumping Ship – from the world of corporate Australia to the heart of social investment'. His inspiring personal and professional story connects his work at Social Ventures Australia and his energy, vision and tenacity to make Goodstart Early Learning the reality and powerhouse it is today. As well as the intriguing Goodstart story, the book is a practical primer for anyone who is serious about ‘jumping ship’ and those who care about how we can improve social outcomes in the Australia of today.

We asked Michael to share key themes from the book and his personal motives in writing it. In particular, as someone who is widely regarded as a driver of the impact investing market in Australia, what potential does he feel this early stage market has to become more mainstream?

I wrote Jumping Ship for two reasons. Firstly, it’s a shortcut. I am frequently asked, “Why did you jump ship after 15 years at Macquarie Bank to work in the social sector?”.

Secondly, I wanted to share what I learnt in the 15 years since I ‘jumped ship’ to highlight that practical partnership solutions which use business disciplines for social purposes are making a real difference.

Avoiding the cycle of poor education and opportunity

My motive for Jumping Ship was driven by growing up in a country town community which would now be regarded as a 'postcode of disadvantage'. Courtesy of the strong values placed on education by my parents and especially my school teacher father, my brother and I were both motivated to take advantage of the educational opportunities we had. But we know talented and capable school peers who didn’t, mostly because the school or the families and community around them didn’t expect them to do well.

The data highlights Australia still has a big divide between those who are trapped in a cycle of poor education and opportunity and those who are not. Despite many genuine attempts by government and non-profits, not enough has changed to shift that data. It outrages me morally that students in those bottom 20% of postcodes are on average two to two-and-a-half years behind their peers in the top 20% by the age of 15 on standard education performance measures. That’s obviously a major economic and productivity issue for Australia.

I reached a point where I felt a strong urge to see if I could use whatever business and professional skills I had acquired in a 20-year career to do something constructive about that issue. The greatly respected social commentator Hugh Mackay, who kindly wrote a foreword for my book, explains better than anyone the reason for wanting that itch to be scratched. He talks about a group of 'affluent purpose seekers' – people who have done well professionally and financially but are looking for ways to engage more meaningfully around family and community. My experience is that there are many who want to have a serious conversation about how they can use their business and professional skills to make a tangible community contribution.

Using business principles for social purpose

At the heart of the work of Social Ventures Australia (SVA), where I spent 12 years as founding Chief Executive, and the $900 million Goodstart Early Learning social enterprise which I chair, is the belief that we can make a significant practical difference by applying business disciplines for social purpose. What I found in that journey is that there are many outstanding people who want to be part of that. Chris Cuffe was an exemplar of this and he made a transformational difference in a three-year period as Executive Director at SVA.

In the work at SVA, Goodstart has received significant profile because of the scale of the enterprise. As Australia’s largest early learning chain, with 644 centres nationally and over 69,600 children attending, it is one of the largest social enterprises in the world. When the deal was put together six years ago, there were many cynics who thought the idea that it could be run in a financially disciplined way and achieve social purpose objectives was nonsense. The cynics have been proved wrong. The investors who committed subordinated debt, so the Goodstart syndicate of four non-profit partners could fund the purchase of the bankrupted ABC Childcare centres, were paid a 12% annual coupon and had their debt fully repaid two years ahead of schedule in 2015.

That six-year journey has also seen substantial investment in critical areas of quality and social purpose, furnished by the solid financial performance of the business. The number of degree-qualified early learning teachers has increased more than fourfold to over 850. There has also been significant investment in improved professional development and specialist support resources to assist the particular needs of over 130 centres located in the bottom 30% of postcodes.

Support needed from superannuation trustees

There has been a lot of conversation about how deals like Goodstart – so-called impact investing transactions with a combination of reasonable financial returns and social purpose outcomes – can become more mainstream. I believe there is enormous potential for this to happen but we have a long way to go. Superannuation fund investors and trustees in particular need convincing that such transactions satisfy the twin test of being of sufficient scale and offering returns that would pass reasonable risk/return hurdles expected by their investment committees.

The current market is quite fragmented. SVA has been a market leader, and was behind the country’s first social benefit bonds, as well as running a $10 million social impact fund and a $30 million commitment from industry fund HESTA. Most of these investments are relatively small scale, as yet. For the opportunity to accelerate, there is a real need for large-scale investments that can deploy capital in amounts which are meaningful for the multibillion-dollar industry and super funds. My belief is that these will happen and will offer the infrastructure type returns (8–12%) that are already being demonstrated in the examples above.

 

Jumping Ship by Michael Traill is published by Hardie Grant and available online and at bookstores. See www.jumpingship.com.au.

 

  •   1 September 2016
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.