Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 124

Lifecycle funds increase super engagement

Engaging people with their superannuation is the holy grail for the wealth management industry. It’s encouraging to see the work super funds are doing to increase engagement but it’s a slow process. The road to that holy grail is paved with challenges, not least of all the intangibility of retirement, particularly for younger customers.

We believe lifecycle funds and MySuper can play a role in achieving greater customer engagement with superannuation.

Lifecycle funds are not only about returns

Lifecycle funds, otherwise known as target-date or age-based funds, invest in a predetermined way depending on the age of the customer. The asset allocation shifts as the time horizon changes and the customer moves towards retirement.

With lifecycle funds, performance is not the sole aim. The primary focus is the final outcome: delivering a suitable level of income at retirement.

One of the advantages of defined benefit funds, once the mainstay of the superannuation industry, was that they gave customers certainty of income at retirement. Today, defined contribution funds are the norm. But the primary measure for success for defined contribution funds is past performance. Being a backward-looking metric, customers don’t have a future figure they can plan around.

Another prevalent measure of success is performance in relative terms i.e. against a peer group or a benchmark. This can provide fiduciaries with important information about the success of manager selection or the management of business risk. However, it provides no information to the customer about their path to a comfortable retirement. What does it mean to a customer if a fund is a ‘second-quartile performer’? It tells the customer nothing about whether their retirement strategy is on track. And this is partly why engagement is so low.

As an industry, we’re blinkered by performance figures, and it’s critical that a fund performs well. However, it’s just as important to look forward and consider whether a fund will deliver a suitable level of income at the end of a working life. Customers are more likely to be engaged with a fund that focuses on a tangible retirement outcome. A lifecycle fund creates a strong platform for customer engagement, including as part of a MySuper solution.

Lifecycle funds aim to manage the competing objectives of maximising return while minimising sequencing risk. This is best expressed through the metaphor of crossing a river. While a river may, on average, be four feet deep, a quarter of the people crossing the river risk drowning because there are pockets in the river that are seven or eight feet deep. The average depth of the river is irrelevant. Our intention is to get as many people as possible across the river without drowning.

We manage our lifecycle funds actively. The fund manager looking after each age-based cohort aims to optimise customers’ income in retirement and increase the certainty of achieving that outcome. In the early years, it’s about maximising return. As members mature, certainty of outcome becomes more important, while rejecting the temptation to de-risk too quickly. It’s made us think about things in new and different ways.

Take customers on the journey

Communication is critical in reaching that holy grail. We need to focus on whether the fund is on track to meet its objective. This might also serve to dissipate investor concerns about short-term volatility as it reminds customers that superannuation is a long-term investment.

MySuper communications now look and feel different to what people are used to. The reports reflect how each age-based cohort is managed and focus on an expected income in retirement rather than a lump sum dollar value. This will help build engagement (although there is nothing stopping a balanced fund from using a similar form of customised communication).

Of course, lifecycle funds aren’t the panacea for engagement and the issues the industry faces. We need to ensure people do not think lifecycle funds give some sort of guarantee. As with all forms of investing, lifecycle funds remain at the mercy of market risk. The challenge is to talk about this risk openly. Customers need to know about the action they can take to help meet their goals in retirement, such as increasing their contributions or planning to work longer.

The hope is that this will lead to customers participating more actively in their super, such as moving out of default choices. The more people are interested in their retirement, the better.

 

Sean Henaghan is AMP Capital’s Multi-Asset Group Chief Investment Officer.

 

  •   28 August 2015
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Reply to Peter: Why a glide path makes sense, with equities for growth

Super engagement better than expected

What Australian super funds can learn from the UK

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Lithium's latest drop and what it means for ASX investors

Lithium's latest sell-off has punished ASX miners as prices remain hostage to shifting expectations. The key challenge is navigating a market prone to extreme volatility despite a strong case for the long-term demand outlook.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

Planning

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Superannuation

How much super should you have?

Average super balances are one of the most misleading benchmarks. They ignore your goals, spending and future needs, creating a false sense of security. Here is how I calculate exactly where I need to be at every decade.

Retirement

Retiring from work is easy, retiring into life is harder

Most people spend decades planning how to retire. Far fewer plan for what comes next. The biggest retirement challenge isn't always financial, and it often catches even the most prepared retirees completely off guard.

Shares

Right asset class, wrong index: the trap in Australian small caps

Most Australian portfolios are concentrated in large caps, with relatively little exposure to smaller companies. But what if the biggest risk isn't the economy, interest rates or valuations? For many, the risk is hidden in plain sight.

Property

Are these assets the missing piece in Australian portfolios?

Many investors remain concentrated in shares, cash and property. Despite their popularity among institutional investors, real assets remain underrepresented in many SMSF portfolios. Could they be the missing piece?

Investment strategies

The biggest risk that buy-and-hold investors ignore

Investors spend decades learning how to stay invested, yet few have a plan for getting out. When a financial goal has a hard deadline, a worked example shows why a fixed derisking schedule should outrank buy-and-hold discipline.

Investment strategies

How passive investing is driving the decline of active fund alpha

Why have active managers struggled as passive investing has surged? Research suggests that flows into index funds and ETFs are creating structural headwinds, penalising the stock-picking strategies that once generated alpha.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.