Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 124

Lifecycle funds increase super engagement

Engaging people with their superannuation is the holy grail for the wealth management industry. It’s encouraging to see the work super funds are doing to increase engagement but it’s a slow process. The road to that holy grail is paved with challenges, not least of all the intangibility of retirement, particularly for younger customers.

We believe lifecycle funds and MySuper can play a role in achieving greater customer engagement with superannuation.

Lifecycle funds are not only about returns

Lifecycle funds, otherwise known as target-date or age-based funds, invest in a predetermined way depending on the age of the customer. The asset allocation shifts as the time horizon changes and the customer moves towards retirement.

With lifecycle funds, performance is not the sole aim. The primary focus is the final outcome: delivering a suitable level of income at retirement.

One of the advantages of defined benefit funds, once the mainstay of the superannuation industry, was that they gave customers certainty of income at retirement. Today, defined contribution funds are the norm. But the primary measure for success for defined contribution funds is past performance. Being a backward-looking metric, customers don’t have a future figure they can plan around.

Another prevalent measure of success is performance in relative terms i.e. against a peer group or a benchmark. This can provide fiduciaries with important information about the success of manager selection or the management of business risk. However, it provides no information to the customer about their path to a comfortable retirement. What does it mean to a customer if a fund is a ‘second-quartile performer’? It tells the customer nothing about whether their retirement strategy is on track. And this is partly why engagement is so low.

As an industry, we’re blinkered by performance figures, and it’s critical that a fund performs well. However, it’s just as important to look forward and consider whether a fund will deliver a suitable level of income at the end of a working life. Customers are more likely to be engaged with a fund that focuses on a tangible retirement outcome. A lifecycle fund creates a strong platform for customer engagement, including as part of a MySuper solution.

Lifecycle funds aim to manage the competing objectives of maximising return while minimising sequencing risk. This is best expressed through the metaphor of crossing a river. While a river may, on average, be four feet deep, a quarter of the people crossing the river risk drowning because there are pockets in the river that are seven or eight feet deep. The average depth of the river is irrelevant. Our intention is to get as many people as possible across the river without drowning.

We manage our lifecycle funds actively. The fund manager looking after each age-based cohort aims to optimise customers’ income in retirement and increase the certainty of achieving that outcome. In the early years, it’s about maximising return. As members mature, certainty of outcome becomes more important, while rejecting the temptation to de-risk too quickly. It’s made us think about things in new and different ways.

Take customers on the journey

Communication is critical in reaching that holy grail. We need to focus on whether the fund is on track to meet its objective. This might also serve to dissipate investor concerns about short-term volatility as it reminds customers that superannuation is a long-term investment.

MySuper communications now look and feel different to what people are used to. The reports reflect how each age-based cohort is managed and focus on an expected income in retirement rather than a lump sum dollar value. This will help build engagement (although there is nothing stopping a balanced fund from using a similar form of customised communication).

Of course, lifecycle funds aren’t the panacea for engagement and the issues the industry faces. We need to ensure people do not think lifecycle funds give some sort of guarantee. As with all forms of investing, lifecycle funds remain at the mercy of market risk. The challenge is to talk about this risk openly. Customers need to know about the action they can take to help meet their goals in retirement, such as increasing their contributions or planning to work longer.

The hope is that this will lead to customers participating more actively in their super, such as moving out of default choices. The more people are interested in their retirement, the better.

 

Sean Henaghan is AMP Capital’s Multi-Asset Group Chief Investment Officer.

 

  •   28 August 2015
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Reply to Peter: Why a glide path makes sense, with equities for growth

Super engagement better than expected

2 billion reasons to fix retirement income

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.