Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 124

Lifecycle funds increase super engagement

Engaging people with their superannuation is the holy grail for the wealth management industry. It’s encouraging to see the work super funds are doing to increase engagement but it’s a slow process. The road to that holy grail is paved with challenges, not least of all the intangibility of retirement, particularly for younger customers.

We believe lifecycle funds and MySuper can play a role in achieving greater customer engagement with superannuation.

Lifecycle funds are not only about returns

Lifecycle funds, otherwise known as target-date or age-based funds, invest in a predetermined way depending on the age of the customer. The asset allocation shifts as the time horizon changes and the customer moves towards retirement.

With lifecycle funds, performance is not the sole aim. The primary focus is the final outcome: delivering a suitable level of income at retirement.

One of the advantages of defined benefit funds, once the mainstay of the superannuation industry, was that they gave customers certainty of income at retirement. Today, defined contribution funds are the norm. But the primary measure for success for defined contribution funds is past performance. Being a backward-looking metric, customers don’t have a future figure they can plan around.

Another prevalent measure of success is performance in relative terms i.e. against a peer group or a benchmark. This can provide fiduciaries with important information about the success of manager selection or the management of business risk. However, it provides no information to the customer about their path to a comfortable retirement. What does it mean to a customer if a fund is a ‘second-quartile performer’? It tells the customer nothing about whether their retirement strategy is on track. And this is partly why engagement is so low.

As an industry, we’re blinkered by performance figures, and it’s critical that a fund performs well. However, it’s just as important to look forward and consider whether a fund will deliver a suitable level of income at the end of a working life. Customers are more likely to be engaged with a fund that focuses on a tangible retirement outcome. A lifecycle fund creates a strong platform for customer engagement, including as part of a MySuper solution.

Lifecycle funds aim to manage the competing objectives of maximising return while minimising sequencing risk. This is best expressed through the metaphor of crossing a river. While a river may, on average, be four feet deep, a quarter of the people crossing the river risk drowning because there are pockets in the river that are seven or eight feet deep. The average depth of the river is irrelevant. Our intention is to get as many people as possible across the river without drowning.

We manage our lifecycle funds actively. The fund manager looking after each age-based cohort aims to optimise customers’ income in retirement and increase the certainty of achieving that outcome. In the early years, it’s about maximising return. As members mature, certainty of outcome becomes more important, while rejecting the temptation to de-risk too quickly. It’s made us think about things in new and different ways.

Take customers on the journey

Communication is critical in reaching that holy grail. We need to focus on whether the fund is on track to meet its objective. This might also serve to dissipate investor concerns about short-term volatility as it reminds customers that superannuation is a long-term investment.

MySuper communications now look and feel different to what people are used to. The reports reflect how each age-based cohort is managed and focus on an expected income in retirement rather than a lump sum dollar value. This will help build engagement (although there is nothing stopping a balanced fund from using a similar form of customised communication).

Of course, lifecycle funds aren’t the panacea for engagement and the issues the industry faces. We need to ensure people do not think lifecycle funds give some sort of guarantee. As with all forms of investing, lifecycle funds remain at the mercy of market risk. The challenge is to talk about this risk openly. Customers need to know about the action they can take to help meet their goals in retirement, such as increasing their contributions or planning to work longer.

The hope is that this will lead to customers participating more actively in their super, such as moving out of default choices. The more people are interested in their retirement, the better.

 

Sean Henaghan is AMP Capital’s Multi-Asset Group Chief Investment Officer.

 

  •   28 August 2015
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Reply to Peter: Why a glide path makes sense, with equities for growth

Super engagement better than expected

There's a reason why your super is locked up until your 60s

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.