Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 201

Managing for retirement income

What can Australia learn from the US as the focus in retirement savings moves from lump sums to income streams?

Treasury, in a discussion paper late last year, described the introduction of new retirement solutions as critical to lifting the living standards and choices of Australians while ensuring the superannuation system remains stable into the future.

With the government planning to enshrine in legislation an income goal for super, Treasury wants to hear from the financial services industry and others by 9 June 2017 about what these comprehensive income (or ‘MyRetirement’) products might look like.

In its discussion paper, Treasury suggested that a MyRetirement product ideally should provide a balance of inflation-adjusted income, risk management, and flexibility.

“Studies typically show that individuals want to maximise their retirement income while managing longevity, inflation, and investment risk and ensure they have sufficient access to their capital for lump-sum withdrawals or unexpected expenses,” the paper says. “Individuals are rarely willing to trade off one retirement objective for another.”

Treasury also highlights the importance of communication, allowing consumers to make meaningful comparisons between different products based on outputs (income, risk, and flexibility) rather than inputs (nature of the underlying component products).

Learning from the US

Many of these questions are being grappled with in other developed economies as governments seek to manage ageing populations and increasing pressures on already-strained public finances.

Like Australia, the US has a mature defined contribution framework and, through the contributions of such thinkers as the Nobel laureate Robert Merton, it also has been looking at how to shift the focus of the system from lump sums to retirement income streams.

“The risk and return variables that now drive investment decisions are not being measured in units that correspond to savers’ retirement goals and their likelihood of meeting them,” Merton says. “Thus, it cannot be said that savers’ funds are being well managed.”

Global asset manager Dimensional, where Merton is resident scientist, has been prominent in the US discussion about retirement income goals. During a recent Australian visit, Dimensional’s Senior Researcher, Massi DeSantis, told local fiduciaries that retirement solutions should help workers grow their assets but also plan the consumption that their portfolios will be able to afford in retirement.

Within this framework, Dr DeSantis cited three key elements:

  1. Risk management that addresses the risks relevant to retirement income
  2. Asset allocation that balances the trade-off between asset growth and income risk management
  3. Meaningful communication that enables fund members to monitor performance in income units.

Risk management around longevity and markets

The first consideration regarding risk management is how long the members’ accumulated savings are expected to support their consumption in retirement. That challenge is growing by the year. In Australia, the average life expectancy of a 65-year-old is 86 years, according to the federal government’s Institute of Health and Welfare. By 2054-2055, the number of Australians aged 65 and over is projected to more than double, with one in every 1,000 people to be aged over 100.

De Santis said that, to account for uncertainty about life expectancy, a five-year buffer can be added to the average retirement horizon, resulting in a 25-year expected withdrawal period, assuming people retire at 65.

The next step is to identify the key drivers of income uncertainty over that withdrawal period, defined in terms of market risk (uncertainty of future stock and bond returns), interest rate risk, and inflation risk.

These risks can be reduced by computing the duration of retirement income streams and allocating to a portfolio of inflation-protected securities that are duration-matched to the planned retirement horizon.

“This framework also helps to manage sequencing risk, as the level of retirement income that can be supported by the allocation to risk management assets is not very sensitive to market risk, interest rate risk, or inflation risk,” Dr DeSantis said.

Asset allocation: growth assets versus risk management assets

Having identified an appropriate risk management strategy, the asset allocation question becomes a trade-off between allocating to growth assets versus risk management assets. The higher the allocation to the risk management assets, the lower the expected volatility of retirement income.

Dimensional in the US recently helped S&P Dow Jones Indices develop an indexing approach to managing the uncertainty of retirement income. The S&P Shift to Retirement Income and DEcumulation (STRIDE) index series uses this framework to seek to grow members’ savings while managing retirement income uncertainty.

“This entails a focus on asset growth early in members’ lifecycles with a transition to an income-focused strategy over time,” Dr DeSantis said. “As participants transition into retirement, the majority of their assets are invested in inflation-protected government securities matched to their retirement horizon.”

Because this is a liquid investment strategy, it provides members the flexibility they need should they require periodic withdrawals in retirement.

Meaningful communication

The third element in the suggested framework for a retirement solution is that it should also allow superannuation fund members (and trustees) to monitor progress toward the retirement income goal. This can be achieved through information that translates the purchasing power of members’ account balances in terms of estimated retirement income.

In the US, the STRIDE indices include a monthly cost of retirement income called the Generalised Retirement Income Liability (GRIL) for each retirement cohort, which can be used to translate account balances to estimated retirement income. (GRIL is defined as the present value of $1 of annual inflation-adjusted income over 25 years starting at the target date. The interest rates used to discount these future hypothetical cash flows to the present are derived from the current US TIPS curve.)

If the GRIL rises, generating a given level of income becomes more costly, and the purchasing power of a given level of savings goes down. If the GRIL falls, the desired monthly income becomes less costly and the purchasing power of savings goes up.

Because of the risk management framework underlying the indices, uncertainty about members’ future income is reduced over time so that communication in income units can be more meaningful.

 

Jim Parker is a Vice-President and Regional Director, Communications for Dimensional. He adapted this article for Australian audiences from ‘Next Generation Retirement Investing’ by Massi DeSantis and published by S&P Dow Jones Indices in its publication ‘Indexology’.


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

The $1.2 trillion sea change facing Australian investors

A $3m super tax could make this strategy attractive again

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever, updated

This time last year, I highlighted 16 ASX stocks that investors could own indefinitely. One year on, I look at whether there should be any changes to the list of stocks as well as which companies are worth buying now. 

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

2025-26 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ABS recently released figures which are used to determine key superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2025. This outlines the rates and thresholds that are changing and those that aren’t.  

Is Gen X ready for retirement?

With the arrival of the new year, the first members of ‘Generation X’ turned 60, marking the start of the MTV generation’s collective journey towards retirement. Are Gen Xers and our retirement system ready for the transition?

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

The intergenerational wealth transfer, largely driven by a housing boom, exacerbates economic inequality, stifles productivity, and impedes social mobility. Solutions lie in addressing the housing problem, not taxing wealth.

What Warren Buffett isn’t saying speaks volumes

Warren Buffett's annual shareholder letter has been fixture for avid investors for decades. In his latest letter, Buffett is reticent on many key topics, but his actions rather than words are sending clear signals to investors.

Latest Updates

Investing

Designing a life, with money to spare

Are you living your life by default or by design? It strikes me that many people are doing the former and living according to others’ expectations of them, leading to poor choices including with their finances.

Investment strategies

A closer look at defensive assets for turbulent times

After the recent market slump, it's a good time to brush up on the defensive asset classes – what they are, why hold them, and how they can both deliver on your goals and increase the reliability of your desired outcomes.

Financial planning

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

Lately, there's been a push by Government for lifetime income streams as a solution to retirement income challenges. We run the numbers on these products to see whether they deliver on what they promise.

Shares

Is it time to buy the Big Four banks?

The stellar run of the major ASX banks last year left many investors scratching their heads. After a recent share price pullback, has value emerged in these banks, or is it best to steer clear of them?

Investment strategies

The useful role that subordinated debt can play in your portfolio

If you’re struggling to replace the hybrid exposure in your portfolio, you’re not alone. Subordinated debt is an option, and here is a guide on what it is and how it can fit into your investment mix.

Shares

Europe is back and small caps there offer significant opportunities

Trump’s moves on tariffs, defence, and Ukraine, have awoken European Governments after a decade of lethargy. European small cap manager, Alantra Asset Management, says it could herald a new era for the continent.

Shares

Lessons from the rise and fall of founder-led companies

Founder-led companies often attract investors due to leaders' personal stakes and long-term vision. But founder presence alone does not guarantee success, and the challenge is to identify which ones will succeed in the long term.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.