Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 97

The simple ‘hot-desk’ equation

Hot-desking is a classic economic phenomenon. For all the hype and discussion it comes down to a very simple equation. A company can reduce its rental expense, but to do this it needs to get its employees to take a pay cut. The pay cut is not in money but rather a reduction in the quality of an employee’s working environment. Economists call this an ‘externality’. My research could discover no facts on the benefits of hot-desking other than rental cost savings.

Hot-desking is sold as a way to break down work cultural barriers, increase collaboration while creating the ‘Office of the Future – Today’. It is a cost saving exercise. Because a very senior executive endorsed the idea, employees are labelled as not having the right cultural values if they show even a hint of disapproval. A totalitarian propaganda machine is in full swing by the time the last photo of the family is removed from the old decommissioned ‘cold’ desk. Centre worker, Cori Girondoudas was docked $3,000 from her pay each year for two years because she repeatedly refused to remove a photograph from her work station. The photograph took her tally of personal items on the desk to four — one above the prescribed limit.

Companies have reported a reduction in rental costs of up to 30% from adopting hot-desking. These enticing savings have to sell it to the employees who suffer an increase in stress and insecurity. Few employees enjoy hot-desking and those who do are often the same people you regret having near you in a cinema, sports game, bus, plane, or marrying into the family.

Hot-desking conveniently ignores the human condition. Humans are territorial, we enjoy a sense of belonging and like a routine. We are also hierarchical. We work hard to get more pay but we also want the corner office. If some spotty graduate comes in early after his gym class and gets the corner desk, we older guys feel pissed off. We will have to seek revenge, in a team building way of course.

Some of you are thinking that I am just an old guy and I need to get with the times. It is true that I sleep better in the same bed each night and the same goes for my desk. It is hard to get 30 minutes sleep if you wake up in a different part of the office having no idea where you are.

But in Ross Gittins’s article on hot-desking, he quotes research that demonstrates that the most important contribution to work place productivity is not collaboration, but individual focus work. In fact, those who can focus on their work in a nesting environment are also better at collaborating.

One of the fundamentals of business is to drive down costs. Businesses are psychopaths and if they can transfer a cost (externality) to the staff then they will. Businesses also suffer from Aspergers. They don’t really understand the human condition, nor do they read body language.

I am now implementing hot-desking in my home office to improve collaboration, break old work habits and enhance productivity. My favourite hot desk is the queen sized one on the top floor. I go there for an hour after lunch to do my best thinking.

Some comments from Donald’s blog:

Geoff

Unfortunately no one is measuring the cost of the reduction in productivity that’s achieved via ‘discretionary effort’. Discretionary effort is that extra bang for the buck that an organisation gets from an employee because they feel good about their job and where they work, importantly employers don’t have to pay money for this, they just have to demonstrate they value their staff. I have spoken with friends, colleagues and customers on this subject and the common factor is that employers are great at measuring the cost savings from hot-desking but don’t attempt to measure at all the loss of discretionary productivity that goes along with it. I wonder if there is a higher turnover rate of staff where hot-desking has been deployed?

Jayne

I would like to add that during flu and cold epidemics, the wonderful world of hot-desking is also introducing us to plagues that seem to move inexorably around the office. If we were truly interested in efficiency we would return to single offices which allow focus, concentration and peace and quiet a la “Quiet: the power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking”. Awesome read if you want to change your thinking on the value of noisy collaboration.

Christine

I’m a working mum who does school drop-offs in the mornings. By the time I get to the office it’s impossible to get a desk; not even a spot along the anti-social benches against the windows. When I do find a spot, often practically in the toilet, I spend good third of my day pacing up and down the corridor locating my team for face-to-face discussions. Cost cutting? For sure. Murderer of productivity? I’ll say.

 

Donald Hellyer is the former Global Head of Funds and Insurance at National Australia Bank and is Co-Founder of BigFuture.

 

  •   18 February 2015
  • 2
  •      
  •   
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Back to the future - Why indexing CGT is a good idea

A return to indexation of capital gains would be a fairer way to compensate households for the effects of inflation than the current discount. Importantly, it opens the door to future, broader reforms to stop the taxation of inflation.

The investment mistake killing your returns

Retail investors face an increasingly complex product environment, but simplicity may be the most overlooked advantage in building a portfolio you can actually live with.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Choose your hedges wisely… and often

A new market regime is exposing the fragility of static hedges. With correlations shifting and safe havens flipping, investors must rethink diversification and adopt more adaptive tools to protect capital.

Investment strategies

Yields take centre stage again

The Australian credit landscape is shifting. Yields are rising, issuance is strong and spreads continue to tighten. Income is re‑emerging as the dominant driver of returns, though pockets of risk may be building beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The grass is always greener: Rethinking Australian vs global equities

Australia's once‑dominant sharemarket is losing ground as others surge ahead, prompting investors to question home‑bias instincts. Meanwhile, the US market appears attractive. Is it time to revisit your global equity allocation?

Investment strategies

Stop asking if there's a stock market bubble. Ask this instead.

Markets continue to push onwards despite valuations looking stretched by historical standards. Bubble talk is rampant, however investors may be focusing on the wrong thing. The real story sits deeper than the headlines.

Taxation

The GST cannot stop inflation

Raising the GST when inflation jumps sounds clever on paper, until we examine how it may play out in practice. What is pitched as a simple inflation fix can lead to a sharp turn in the wrong direction for prices.

Shares

Why SpaceX is coming to your super fund

SpaceX’s blockbuster debut is grabbing headlines, but the real story for Australian investors is much quieter. Giant listings eventually filter into super funds and ETFs, subtly reshaping portfolios long before most realise.

Taxation

Is the government being honest with us about its business CGT changes?

The government’s assurances on small‑business concessions don’t withstand the scrutiny. Token carve‑outs and a lack of credible rationale for CGT changes may reshape how Australia rewards long‑term value creation. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.