Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 97

The simple ‘hot-desk’ equation

Hot-desking is a classic economic phenomenon. For all the hype and discussion it comes down to a very simple equation. A company can reduce its rental expense, but to do this it needs to get its employees to take a pay cut. The pay cut is not in money but rather a reduction in the quality of an employee’s working environment. Economists call this an ‘externality’. My research could discover no facts on the benefits of hot-desking other than rental cost savings.

Hot-desking is sold as a way to break down work cultural barriers, increase collaboration while creating the ‘Office of the Future – Today’. It is a cost saving exercise. Because a very senior executive endorsed the idea, employees are labelled as not having the right cultural values if they show even a hint of disapproval. A totalitarian propaganda machine is in full swing by the time the last photo of the family is removed from the old decommissioned ‘cold’ desk. Centre worker, Cori Girondoudas was docked $3,000 from her pay each year for two years because she repeatedly refused to remove a photograph from her work station. The photograph took her tally of personal items on the desk to four — one above the prescribed limit.

Companies have reported a reduction in rental costs of up to 30% from adopting hot-desking. These enticing savings have to sell it to the employees who suffer an increase in stress and insecurity. Few employees enjoy hot-desking and those who do are often the same people you regret having near you in a cinema, sports game, bus, plane, or marrying into the family.

Hot-desking conveniently ignores the human condition. Humans are territorial, we enjoy a sense of belonging and like a routine. We are also hierarchical. We work hard to get more pay but we also want the corner office. If some spotty graduate comes in early after his gym class and gets the corner desk, we older guys feel pissed off. We will have to seek revenge, in a team building way of course.

Some of you are thinking that I am just an old guy and I need to get with the times. It is true that I sleep better in the same bed each night and the same goes for my desk. It is hard to get 30 minutes sleep if you wake up in a different part of the office having no idea where you are.

But in Ross Gittins’s article on hot-desking, he quotes research that demonstrates that the most important contribution to work place productivity is not collaboration, but individual focus work. In fact, those who can focus on their work in a nesting environment are also better at collaborating.

One of the fundamentals of business is to drive down costs. Businesses are psychopaths and if they can transfer a cost (externality) to the staff then they will. Businesses also suffer from Aspergers. They don’t really understand the human condition, nor do they read body language.

I am now implementing hot-desking in my home office to improve collaboration, break old work habits and enhance productivity. My favourite hot desk is the queen sized one on the top floor. I go there for an hour after lunch to do my best thinking.

Some comments from Donald’s blog:

Geoff

Unfortunately no one is measuring the cost of the reduction in productivity that’s achieved via ‘discretionary effort’. Discretionary effort is that extra bang for the buck that an organisation gets from an employee because they feel good about their job and where they work, importantly employers don’t have to pay money for this, they just have to demonstrate they value their staff. I have spoken with friends, colleagues and customers on this subject and the common factor is that employers are great at measuring the cost savings from hot-desking but don’t attempt to measure at all the loss of discretionary productivity that goes along with it. I wonder if there is a higher turnover rate of staff where hot-desking has been deployed?

Jayne

I would like to add that during flu and cold epidemics, the wonderful world of hot-desking is also introducing us to plagues that seem to move inexorably around the office. If we were truly interested in efficiency we would return to single offices which allow focus, concentration and peace and quiet a la “Quiet: the power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking”. Awesome read if you want to change your thinking on the value of noisy collaboration.

Christine

I’m a working mum who does school drop-offs in the mornings. By the time I get to the office it’s impossible to get a desk; not even a spot along the anti-social benches against the windows. When I do find a spot, often practically in the toilet, I spend good third of my day pacing up and down the corridor locating my team for face-to-face discussions. Cost cutting? For sure. Murderer of productivity? I’ll say.

 

Donald Hellyer is the former Global Head of Funds and Insurance at National Australia Bank and is Co-Founder of BigFuture.

 

  •   18 February 2015
  • 2
  •      
  •   
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.