Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 351

Avoid complacency with your SMSF's investment strategy

Your SMSF is required to have an investment strategy which is a plan for making, holding and realising investments in line with the fund’s investment objectives. It’s a common misunderstanding that the strategy should be a mere statement of the types of investments your SMSF will invest in.

There's more to it than many trustees think

But that’s not enough. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO), as a regulator of SMSFs, has recently said that trustees need to explain why the fund has made the investments. They also are interested in how the strategy provides benefits to each fund member on retirement or how it will provide for their dependants after the member’s death.

Don’t be surprised if the auditor of your SMSF takes greater interest in the investment strategy because it’s a requirement that it is reviewed regularly.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy is general and has not considered the risks in making, holding and realising investments in addition to the likely returns, it may have a problem complying with the superannuation law. As trustee, you need to consider the objectives of the fund and any cash flow requirements plus the members’ insurance requirements.

The superannuation law requires that a fund trustee must consider:

  1. The fund’s investments as a whole and include the extent to which those investments are diverse or involve exposure of the fund to risks from inadequate diversification.
  2. The liquidity of the fund’s investments, having regard to its expected cash flow requirements.
  3. The ability of the fund to discharge its existing and prospective liabilities.
  4. Whether the trustees have considered insurance cover for one or more fund members.

You may be the sole member of your SMSF or have recently become the sole member of an SMSF because of a change in membership. Your adviser may recommend a review of your SMSF’s investment strategy to fine tune any change in the fund’s cash flow requirements, investments and maybe the insurance needs of members. If you don’t have an adviser, then it could be time for you to review it.

Investment strategy and fund audits

During the last six months, the ATO has focussed especially on SMSFs that have high concentrations of investments in one asset class such as property, shares, cash or fixed deposits. It sent out around 18,000 letters to remind SMSF trustees that the fund’s investment strategy should justify the is a lack of diversification.

In the first instance, they require the fund auditor and you as trustee to make any changes. We have seen a renewed interest by auditors in closely examining funds to ensure the investments are consistent with the fund’s investment strategy. This is usually brought to the attention of the trustees in the auditor’s Management Letter but in the worst cases may be brought to the ATO’s attention.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy doesn’t adequately demonstrate what the law requires, you probably have one of two options:

  • Replace your SMSF’s current investment strategy with one that meets the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act, or
  • Provide an amendment to the current investment strategy which provides additional information on how the trustee(s) have considered the above requirements.

In most situations, auditors have accepted an amendment that includes the extra information required. This usually covers how the trustee has considered the SIS requirements and why investments have been made to provide the required benefits. 

What you need to do if there is a change

Your SMSF’s investment strategy must adequately reflect changes. This is especially true following recent stockmarket falls, where asset allocations may have fallen outside defined bands. A good SMSF administrator should advise you when this happens, as we do with clients of SuperConcepts. Other changes include where:

  • the cash flow requirements of the fund alter if you decide to start or stop an income stream
  • a lump sum is to be paid in cash,
  • someone has joined or ceased as a fund member.

The law requires a regular review and the trustee’s confirmation that it has taken place, usually each year.

 

Graeme Colley is the Executive Manager, SMSF Technical and Private Wealth at SuperConcepts, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider any individual’s investment objectives.

For more articles and papers from SuperConcepts, please click here.

 

  •   1 April 2020
  • 1
  •      
  •   
1 Comments
Greg McKay
April 06, 2020

Begs the question: who is running your SMSF.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: Tips for the last member standing

Meg on SMSFs: Where are the risks in our major super sectors?

A guide to valuing SMSF assets correctly

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.