Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 351

Avoid complacency with your SMSF's investment strategy

Your SMSF is required to have an investment strategy which is a plan for making, holding and realising investments in line with the fund’s investment objectives. It’s a common misunderstanding that the strategy should be a mere statement of the types of investments your SMSF will invest in.

There's more to it than many trustees think

But that’s not enough. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO), as a regulator of SMSFs, has recently said that trustees need to explain why the fund has made the investments. They also are interested in how the strategy provides benefits to each fund member on retirement or how it will provide for their dependants after the member’s death.

Don’t be surprised if the auditor of your SMSF takes greater interest in the investment strategy because it’s a requirement that it is reviewed regularly.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy is general and has not considered the risks in making, holding and realising investments in addition to the likely returns, it may have a problem complying with the superannuation law. As trustee, you need to consider the objectives of the fund and any cash flow requirements plus the members’ insurance requirements.

The superannuation law requires that a fund trustee must consider:

  1. The fund’s investments as a whole and include the extent to which those investments are diverse or involve exposure of the fund to risks from inadequate diversification.
  2. The liquidity of the fund’s investments, having regard to its expected cash flow requirements.
  3. The ability of the fund to discharge its existing and prospective liabilities.
  4. Whether the trustees have considered insurance cover for one or more fund members.

You may be the sole member of your SMSF or have recently become the sole member of an SMSF because of a change in membership. Your adviser may recommend a review of your SMSF’s investment strategy to fine tune any change in the fund’s cash flow requirements, investments and maybe the insurance needs of members. If you don’t have an adviser, then it could be time for you to review it.

Investment strategy and fund audits

During the last six months, the ATO has focussed especially on SMSFs that have high concentrations of investments in one asset class such as property, shares, cash or fixed deposits. It sent out around 18,000 letters to remind SMSF trustees that the fund’s investment strategy should justify the is a lack of diversification.

In the first instance, they require the fund auditor and you as trustee to make any changes. We have seen a renewed interest by auditors in closely examining funds to ensure the investments are consistent with the fund’s investment strategy. This is usually brought to the attention of the trustees in the auditor’s Management Letter but in the worst cases may be brought to the ATO’s attention.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy doesn’t adequately demonstrate what the law requires, you probably have one of two options:

  • Replace your SMSF’s current investment strategy with one that meets the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act, or
  • Provide an amendment to the current investment strategy which provides additional information on how the trustee(s) have considered the above requirements.

In most situations, auditors have accepted an amendment that includes the extra information required. This usually covers how the trustee has considered the SIS requirements and why investments have been made to provide the required benefits. 

What you need to do if there is a change

Your SMSF’s investment strategy must adequately reflect changes. This is especially true following recent stockmarket falls, where asset allocations may have fallen outside defined bands. A good SMSF administrator should advise you when this happens, as we do with clients of SuperConcepts. Other changes include where:

  • the cash flow requirements of the fund alter if you decide to start or stop an income stream
  • a lump sum is to be paid in cash,
  • someone has joined or ceased as a fund member.

The law requires a regular review and the trustee’s confirmation that it has taken place, usually each year.

 

Graeme Colley is the Executive Manager, SMSF Technical and Private Wealth at SuperConcepts, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider any individual’s investment objectives.

For more articles and papers from SuperConcepts, please click here.

 

  •   1 April 2020
  • 1
  •      
  •   
1 Comments
Greg McKay
April 06, 2020

Begs the question: who is running your SMSF.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Red flags to watch out for when considering an SMSF

Meg on SMSFs: Tips for the last member standing

Meg on SMSFs: Where are the risks in our major super sectors?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.