Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 6

Small can be beautiful

When British economist E.F. Schumacher published his ground-breaking book Small is Beautiful in 1973, Newsweek’s review said it was, “Nothing less than a full-scale assault on conventional economic wisdom.” While Schumacher’s argument about empowering people and making work available on a more human scale is not the direct subject of this article, I have always believed there are important advantages that relatively small investors have over large institutions. Schumacher faults economics for failing to consider the most appropriate scale for an activity, and the same principle applies to investing. There is no doubt that many fund managers feel they would perform better if they had less to manage.

Notwithstanding conventional wisdom to the contrary, bigger is not always better.

In this article, I will focus not on the small retail investor, but on the ‘mid-tier’, that group of family offices, wealthy high net worth individuals, and smaller funds that operates across many asset classes. There are thousands of professionals who go about their daily investing without much profile, but with some useful advantages over the big end of town.

Consider a boutique fund manager who sets up a new business with a relatively modest $200 million to manage. It’s a fresh start, no existing capital gains or losses to influence a trading decision, no worries about exceeding the 5% and 20% ownership thresholds imposed by the ASX, no moving the market filling large orders.

Typically, a fund manager will have portfolio limits such as:

  • no more than 10% of the portfolio can be placed into any one stock
  • the portfolio cannot own more than 20% of the issued capital of any one company.

Assume this new fund manager has an intimate knowledge of a small company with a market capitalisation of $100 million which he thinks is well undervalued. Under his investment criteria, he can buy $20 million of this company, which will make up a significant 10% of his entire portfolio.

Then assume this fund manager is successful and a year later he is managing $2 billion. If he discovers a similar investment, the $20 million he can invest in a similar-sized company is now a meaningless 1% of his portfolio. Even if he is correct and the company’s shares skyrocket, the effect on his entire portfolio will be tiny. Although he loves the success of his business and the fees he earns on his big portfolio, he no doubt laments the days when he could be more nimble.

The capitalisation of companies listed on the ASX is surprisingly concentrated. The top 10 companies comprise 63% of the ASX/S&P200, and the top 50 are over 80%. The 200th company on the ASX has a market capitalisation of only $144 million. While 200 companies seems a lot to choose from, there are 2,200 companies listed on the ASX.

So there’s the first issue. The big fund managers must invest in the big companies. They simply have too much money to invest, and placing $10 million with a small company is hardly worth the research effort. Furthermore, larger funds are often ‘open-ended’, which means they are subject to new applications and redemptions. This requires the fund to remain liquid, and the most liquid stocks are the largest. Not surprisingly, since that’s where most of the activity is, it’s also where the most broker research is targeted. Large fund managers reward brokers with orders based on the quality of their research. Not much use spending expensive analyst resources researching a $50 million company if your clients can’t buy it.

Investment markets are comprised of many participants with unique circumstances, mandates and restrictions. Smaller investors should consider where they have advantages which should be arbitraged to the fullest extent possible, including:

  • They can be genuine long term investors. Consider the predicament facing large fund managers during the GFC. As investors panicked, securities such as the listed hybrids issued by major Australian banks were sold off heavily, discounted as much as 40% below their issue prices. Frustratingly for many fund managers, knowing this represented excellent value for such quality issuers, they were not only unable to buy, but were also themselves forced sellers as their investors lodged redemption notices. A private investor can simply sit out these periods of turmoil and concentrate on the original ‘hold to maturity’ decision.
  • A large portion of the Australian sharemarket is influenced by investors who are offshore or who are measured by pre-tax results. Both these factors mean that franking credits are undervalued. However, most large fund managers cannot take advantage of delivering after-tax efficiency to their clients, because their performance is not measured accordingly. In fact, they can appear to have underperformed pre-tax even if they have done well post-tax. For example, a large fund manager has no incentive to hold a stock for longer than 12 months to collect the capital gains discount, and indeed, may sell after 11 months without realising the impact on the tax bill of the end investor.
  • Most professional fund managers manage their portfolios against specific benchmarks. Many are loath to be too different from these benchmarks lest they get the call wrong (even in the short term) and suffer the possibility of loss of business or loss of job. Smaller, private investors do not have this constraint and the investment portfolio can truly be managed in the best interests of the beneficiaries.
  • Compared to retail investors, family offices and smaller funds are of sufficient size to negotiate lower agency costs (e.g. stockbroker fees, portfolio management fees, etc.), though they will not have the buying power of the large institutional investors and will obviously incur higher fees than them unless they leverage off a bigger relationship elsewhere.
  • Most large managers need to value their portfolios to market regularly, as often as daily, as they have underlying investors coming and going from their funds. This continuous ‘marked to market’ environment means they are not naturally ‘patient investors’ and may avoid various illiquid investments, leaving such securities undervalued for other investors.
  • There is considerable flexibility to buy and sell parcels of securities at short notice and with minimal effect on prices. Outside of the Top 50 companies, it is common for bid/offer prices on the ASX to be wide or subject to small volumes. A large investor can take days or weeks to buy or sell a stock, long after the more nimble have moved on.

It must be acknowledged, however, that larger investors do have their own advantages. The obvious ones are access to research and management. Sit in the foyer of any large fund manager at company report time and a steady stream of the highest profile CEOs in the land will parade through with their assistants in tow (whether this is of any value under the strict compliance guidelines of continuous market disclosure is another matter).

More tangible is access to major company placements, where a broker is given a mandate by a company to raise a chunk of cash quickly, usually at a discount to market, and the calls go out to the big managers. A good example is the large placement by Wesfarmers to Capital Research Global Investors ($500 million) and Colonial First State ($400 million) in February 2009 following the company’s $18.2 billion purchase of Coles in 2007. The acquisition left the company exposed to the GFC and high borrowing costs, and a worried market sent its shares down 50% from around $30 to below $15. The two big funds stepped up at $14.25 a share, while smaller investors had to be satisfied with a 3 for 7 pro-rata entitlement offer. Wesfarmers’ shares rose rapidly afterwards based on an improved balance sheet, and the large fund managers and their clients were handsomely rewarded.

And in the last 12 months, it is the large cap companies which have performed the best, as investors have sought the reliable income from their dividends in the face of falling interest rates. In fact, the ASX20 is only about 10% below its all-time peak, while the ASX200 is still 25% below. Many small companies are still 50% off their pre-GFC levels, so the large funds have not suffered recently from their constrained investment universe.

The conventional wisdom sees the Italian suits in the expensive high-rise offices, supported by teams of analysts and banks of Bloomberg screens, and assumes that’s where the action is. Meanwhile, in a small family office in a warehouse in the Inner West, a couple of casually-dressed guys are moving in and out of opportunities the large fund managers don’t even hear about.

Small can be beautiful, even if the suits can also do well throwing their weight around.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The nuts and bolts of family trusts

There are well over 800,000 family trusts in Australia, controlling more than $3 trillion of assets. Here's a guide on whether a family trust may have a place in your individual investment strategy.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 581 with weekend update

A recent industry event made me realise that a 30 year old investing trend could still have serious legs. Could it eventually pose a threat to two of Australia's biggest companies?

  • 10 October 2024

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 583 with weekend update

Investing guru Howard Marks says he had two epiphanies while visiting Australia recently: the two major asset classes aren’t what you think they are, and one key decision matters above all else when building portfolios.

  • 24 October 2024

Warren Buffett is preparing for a bear market. Should you?

Berkshire Hathaway’s third quarter earnings update reveals Buffett is selling stocks and building record cash reserves. Here’s a look at his track record in calling market tops and whether you should follow his lead and dial down risk.

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

How have so many wealthy families through history managed to squander their fortunes? This looks at the lessons from these families and offers several solutions to making and keeping money over the long-term.

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

Latest Updates

Property

Coalition's super for housing plan is better than it looks

Housing affordability is shaping up as a major topic as we head toward the next federal election. The Coalition's proposal to allow home buyers to dip into their superannuation has merit, though misses one key feature.

Planning

Avoiding wealth transfer pitfalls

Australia is in the early throes of an intergenerational wealth transfer worth an estimated $3.5 trillion. Here's a case study highlighting some of the challenges with transferring wealth between generations.

Retirement

More people want to delay retirement and continue working

A new survey suggests that most people aged 50 or over don't intend to stop work completely when they reach retirement age. And a significant proportion of those who delay retirement do so for non-financial reasons.

Economy

US debt, the weak AUD and the role of super funds

The more the US needs capital and funding, the higher its currency goes. For Australia, this has become a significant problem as the US draws our capital to sustain its growth, putting pressure on our economy and the Aussie dollar.

Investment strategies

America eats the world

As the S&P 500 rips to new highs, the US now accounts for a staggering two-thirds of the world equity index. This looks at how America came to dwarf other markets, and what could change to slow or halt its momentum.

Gold

What's next for gold?

Despite a recent pullback, gold has been one of the best performing assets this year. What are the key factors behind the rise and what's needed for the bull market in the yellow metal to continue?

Taxation

Consulting on the side? Don't fall into these tax traps

Consultants must be aware of the risks of Personal Service Income rules applying to their income. Especially if they want to split their income or work through a company.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.