Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 196

SMSF investments do not match objectives

Most individual investors are facing the same dilemma at the moment. They don’t want to sit in cash or deposits earning little in real returns (the cash rate and inflation are about the same), share markets look fully valued (the All Ords closed at its highest level since May 2015 on the day of writing, and the Dow has seen many all-time highs this year) and even that darling, residential property, is looking skittish. Yet to build retirement savings at a decent long-term target return of say 8%, risks need to be taken.

Unrealistic return expectations in current market

It’s one reason why recent research by AMP Capital into the investments of 800 SMSF trustees shows a disconnect between growth aspirations and actual asset allocations, and the difference is stark. The annual ‘Black Sky Report’ shows SMSF trustees expect a 10.9% return on their portfolio in 2017, made up of 6% capital growth and 4.9% income. Yet about 55% have moved to a more defensive asset allocation in the last year as they worry about market levels. Only 18% have increased their allocation to growth categories.

A typical balanced institutional portfolio will have an asset allocation of about 30% cash and fixed interest, 35% Australian shares, 20% global shares, 10% property and 5% others (such as infrastructure, hedge funds or private equity). However, although most SMSF trustees know they need a diversified portfolio, over half their fund balances are invested in only one investment type outside of managed funds.

How do SMSF trustees make decisions?

About three-quarters of trustees report they do not use any tools to assist with portfolio construction, which leaves plenty of scope for financial advice to assist with an investment strategy. Trustees also rely to a surprising amount on their own research to make their decisions (and another study shows Cuffelinks is prominent among investment newsletters).

Challenges facing SMSF trustees

The respondents identified three main areas of concern for the next 12 months:

 

 

  1. Market volatility (18%)

 

  1. Investment selection (11%)

 

  1. Regulatory changes (10%).

 

Although most trustees rely primarily on their own research, most want to learn more and nearly 60% are willing to use a financial adviser. About 37% of trustees nominated ‘retirement strategies’ as the area requiring most assistance.

There is an increasing recognition of new opportunities in active ETFs and unlisted managed funds which diversify away from the usual ASX index exposures. AMP Capital’s Tim Keegan noted:

“If trustees continue to be exposed to significant portfolio concentration risk and remain in more defensive assets without seeking financial advice, they may struggle to achieve their retirement goals. We can see through the report that their interest and understanding in ETFs have increased, but there is definitely a demand for more education ... I strongly believe that is going to be an ongoing theme because the Australian market is concentrated on banks, miners and telcos, so there’s a very limited range of industry sectors and markets to be exposed to.”

The SMSF trustees surveyed by AMP Capital are higher users of managed funds than most trustees, due to the more regular use of advisers, and they see the benefits of ETFs as:

 

 

  1. Ease of diversification 45%)

 

  1. Access to out-of-reach investments (41%)

 

  1. International diversification (36%).

 

Why SMSF trustees set up their own funds

The research also confirms the widely-held views on why SMSFs are being set up by the thousand each month:

 

 

  1. More control over investment (56%)

 

  1. Choose specific shares to invest in (32%)

 

  1. Save money on fees (31%)

 

On a positive note, the trustees are aiming for an average of about $2 million in investible assets before they retire, and 72% say they are on track to achieve this goal.

 

The 2017 Black Sky Report can be downloaded here. AMP Capital is a sponsor of Cuffelinks.

  •   30 March 2017
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Red flags to watch out for when considering an SMSF

SMSF estate planning: Eight things to consider

Clime time: Asset allocation decisions for SMSFs

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.