Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 576

Stop paying attention

Improving our investment behaviour is difficult.

Our choices have a messy confluence of influences ranging from the explicit (financial incentives) to the implicit (our own psychological wiring). It is impossible to ever understand precisely why we made a particular decision – it is just too complex. This doesn’t mean, however, that we are helpless bystanders.

In fact, there are many seemingly innocuous areas that we can change to improve the chances that we might make sound judgements. Foremost of these is what we pay attention to – our investment decisions are inextricably linked to what we see and the impact it has on us.

A useful activity for any investor is to note down the major financial market issues that are in focus each week. After a year or so we can review these and realise how unworthy of our attention they were. As an added bonus, we might also want to make a prediction about how these issues will unfold so – on the rare occasion they are meaningful – we can see how lousy we were in forecasting them.

This might seem glib, but it is not.  As investors, what we pay attention to dominates our decision making. We are bombarded with information (noise) that encourages costly choices at the expense of our long-term goals.

Our attention is drawn towards things that are available (easily accessible) and salient (provoke some form of emotional response). For investors this means whatever narrative thread is being weaved around random and unpredictable fluctuations in market prices. This is a major problem as the things we are being constantly exposed to are exactly the things that most of us should be ignoring.

For the majority of investors – those who invest over the long-term for profits, dividends and coupons – there is no need to have six screens providing a plethora of real time financial market information. Knowing what equity markets did yesterday is an irrelevance, and it is okay to ignore the latest hot topic.

Even the areas that the industry treats as the most important thing in the world – such as what the Fed will do at its next meeting – just don’t matter that much to fundamentally driven investors with long-run horizons. The asset management industry compels us to engage with all of these distractions, when the route to better decision making is finding ways to avoid them.

The problem, of course, is that avoiding them is incredibly difficult. Not only are we designed to care about what is happening right in front of our eyes, but everyone else behaves as if every move in markets is based on a vital new piece of information. Looking one way while the crowd looks in the opposite direction takes incredible resolve.

Is there anything we can do to stop us paying attention to the wrong things?

The first step is to separate the investment industry machine with its ‘9 seconds until markets open’ or ‘German equities were down 1.2% over the month after weak industrial production numbers’ from actual investing. In most cases, the incessant cacophony of financial market news flow is nothing more than advertising – it is designed to grab our eyeballs, our clicks or our money in one form or another – it is an irrelevance to the real reason most of us are investing. Treat it for what it is – interesting but meaningless at best, a damaging distraction at worst.

Next, we need to clearly and explicitly define what we should be paying attention to. Based on our goals, what are the things that are worthy of our focus and attention? What are the aspects that really matter to meeting our objectives? These will be specific to each individual but will inevitably be stable and boring, and come with no requirement to care that the US ten-year treasury yield fell by 7bps last week.

Asset managers – who are inevitably heavily complicit in this chronic attention challenge faced by investors – will say that financial markets are constantly in motion and that it is not feasible to simply act as if nothing is happening. Clients would be left uncertain, anxious and prone to even worse decisions. Although this sounds credible, it doesn’t really hold water. There is not a choice between adding to the gobbledygook or saying nothing at all. How about putting short-term financial market fluctuations in their appropriate context and explaining why it is rarely that worthy of our attention or action?

Talking about topics also bestows credibility to them. If asset managers spend time discussing monthly market fluctuations and performance, they shouldn’t be surprised if clients consider it to be important. Professional investors should always be asking themselves – how is what I am saying likely to influence the behaviour of my clients?

What we pay attention to tends to drive the decisions we make, and investors are persistently exposed to meaningless noise masquerading as meaningful information. We tend to perceive investment acumen in those individuals with an intimate knowledge of these daily market gyrations, but we have this entirely backwards – the ones with real skill are those who find ways to ignore it.

 

Joe Wiggins is Director of Research at UK wealth manager, St James’s Place and publisher of investment insights through a behavioural science lens at www.behaviouralinvestment.com. His book The Intelligent Fund Investor explores the beliefs and behaviours that lead investors astray, and shows how we can make better decisions.

This article was originally published on Joe’s website, Behavioural Investment, and is reproduced with permission.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Are more informed investors prone to making poorer decisions?

Price is a liar: take three steps before you dive in

Market fall reveals your risk tolerance and loss aversion

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.