Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 344

Strong capital flows support non-residential real estate

Deep pools of capital chasing prime non-residential assets combined with low funding costs will continue to be a feature of the Australian market in 2020.

Globally, governments have reverted to a more accommodative monetary stance amid the risks of slowing economic growth and muted inflation. This ‘low for longer’ theme supports investment fundamentals in real estate.

Institutional investors around the world dedicate an average of 10.4% of their portfolios to real estate, below the average target allocation of 11.4% (that is, their strategic intention). Allocations are rising, with just under two-thirds of the 154 institutions participating in the ANREV, INREV and Pension Real Estate Association (PREA) Investment Intentions Survey planning to ramp up their real estate exposure in 2020. About 95% intend to deploy new capital into the sector in 2020.

Popularity of Sydney and Melbourne

These global institutions expect to invest over US$100 billion into real estate in 2020 and Australia is well placed to capture a slice of this capital deployment.

In terms of investor’s regional allocations, 77% plan to increase existing allocations to Asia-Pacific, with just under 7% expecting their current allocations to decrease.

Of those looking to invest in the Asia-Pacific region, Australia remains the preferred investment destination, with Sydney and Melbourne topping the list for the fourth consecutive year. The two Japanese powerhouse cities, Tokyo and Osaka, rounded up the top four investment destinations (Figure 1). Sydney was the overall top pick, highlighted by two-thirds of investors.

Figure 1: Preferred Asia-Pacific Investment Locations for 2020

Note: Based on sample of 50: 41 institutional investors and 9 fund of funds
Source: ANREV, INREV, PREA

When breaking down by investor domicile, European investors are more optimistic on Sydney and Melbourne than investors from Asia-Pacific or North America (Figure 2). The latter two are more focused on the Japanese cities of Tokyo and Osaka.

Figure 2: Top 10 Most Preferred Asia-Pacific Locations for 2020

Note: Based on sample of 50: 41 institutional investors and 9 funds of funds
Source: ANREV, INREV, PREA

Office and industrial preferred to retail

Drilling down to real estate sectors, Asia-Pacific’s top ten destinations are dominated by the Australian and Japanese markets, with Tier 1 cities in China being the only other location represented (Figure 3). In line with the 2019 results, Melbourne office followed by Sydney office remained the most preferred city-sector investment combinations. Sydney industrial/logistics ranked fourth while Melbourne industrial/logistics ranked 10th.

Notably, retail did not feature in the top 10 city/sector combinations. With both structural (e-commerce, changing retail formats) and cyclical (consumer sentiment, retail spending) impacting retail, the appetite for retail assets has substantially decreased amongst institutional investors.

Figure 3: Most Preferred City/Sector in Asia Pacific for 2020

Note: Based on sample of 50: 41 institutional investors and 9 fund of funds Source: ANREV, INREV, PREA

Lower interest rates are supporting prices

Across most Australian sectors and sub-markets, with the exception of large retail centres, the underlying real estate fundamentals are good – positive demand, high occupancy, growing rents and limited supply.

For foreign investors, Australia offers the additional benefits relative to many other global destinations of stability, transparency and governance, and a falling exchange rate has seen currency hedging costs come down considerably in recent years.

Although the upcycle is now into its 11th year, lower interest rates will be supportive for non-residential real estate in 2020. The current yield arbitrage is significant. Australian bond yields are at record lows, with the 10-year bond yield compressing from 5.3% in 2009 to around 1.0% currently. Lower bond yields are flowing through to asset values via lower cap rates (yields).

The yield on non-residential property across most sector and markets is also at record lows. Yet the average premium to the 10-year government bond still offers a significant premium. As table 1 shows, for prime Sydney office the spread is 350 basis points (3.5%), for prime Sydney industrial its 388 basis points (3.88%) and for prime Sydney regional retail centres its 500 basis points (5%).

Back in 2007, the yield spread for prime office, industrial and retail was negative. In other words, yields on real estate were actually below the prevailing 10-year government bond yield.

With the cash rate at 0.25%, and term deposits and Australian government bonds paying between 0.25% and 1.5% per annum, non-residential real estate yields look comparatively attractive.

Table 1: Prime Yields – December 2019

In this lower-for-longer environment, investors are recalibrating their expectations of the required rate of return from real estate. Assets will likely continue to trade on yields which were previously unheard of. There is also limited tier one investment stock to satisfy capital demand from both domestic and global investors, thereby putting further downward pressure on yields and pushing asset prices higher.

Focus on quality

In such an environment, investors need to remain cognisant of risk factors and maintain discipline in investment decision-making. Now is not the time to be chasing secondary assets which are trading at small discounts to prime assets. In every real estate cycle where capital is abundant, some investors desperate to get set misprice secondary assets providing little buffer when the cycle eventually turns.

Across the sectors, we anticipate continued strong demand for office, industrial and real estate backed social infrastructure assets (childcare, government leased, student accommodation etc).

Retail is expected to face further challenges, although those assets focused on convenience, non-discretionary spending (neighbourhood, supermarket anchored centres) will do better than the larger regional retail centres (department and discount department store anchored) that are more dependent on discretionary, particularly fashion, spending.

Ultimately, investing in the year ahead will come down to quality – the quality of the cashflow and asset. Investors should focus on assets in prime locations, with strong tenant covenants, attractive rent review structures and long-term leases. Quality will win in the long run.

 

Adrian Harrington is Head of Capital and Product Development at Charter Hall, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers from Charter Hall (and previously, Folkestone), please click here.

 

  •   12 February 2020
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Offices will live on in a post-COVID world

Not all non-residential real estate performs the same

The hot spots in commercial real estate

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.