Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.
25 April 2024
Recently trending
Andrew Buchan, Partner, HLB Mann Judd: "I have told you a thousand times it's the best newsletter."
Ian Kelly, CFP, BTACS Financial Services: "Probably the best source of commentary and information I have seen over the past 20 years."
Jonathan Hoyle, CEO, Stanford Brown: "A fabulous publication. The only must-read weekly publication for the Australian wealth management industry."
Eleanor Dartnall, AFA Adviser of the Year, 2014: "Our clients love your newsletter. Your articles are avidly read by advisers and they learn a great deal."
Reader: " Finding a truly independent and interesting read has been magical for me. Please keep it up and don't change!"
Professor Robert Deutsch: "This has got to be the best set of articles on economic and financial matters. Always something worthwhile reading in Firstlinks. Thankyou"
Reader: "The BEST in the game because of diversity and not aligned to financial products. Stands above all the noise."
Reader: "An island of professionalism in an ocean of shallow self-interest. Well done!"
Scott Pape, author of The Barefoot Investor: "I'm an avid reader of Cuffelinks. Thanks for the wonderful resource you have here, it really is first class."
David Goldschmidt, Chartered Accountant: "I find this a really excellent newsletter. The best I get. Keep up the good work!"
Reader: "Is one of very few places an investor can go and not have product rammed down their throat. Love your work!"
Reader: "Great resource. Cuffelinks is STILL the one and only weekly newsletter I regularly read."
John Egan, Egan Associates: "My heartiest congratulations. Your panel of contributors is very impressive and keep your readers fully informed."
Reader: "Best innovation I have seen whilst an investor for 25 years. The writers are brilliant. A great publication which I look forward to."
Reader: "I can quickly sort the items that I am interested in, then research them more fully. It is also a regular reminder that I need to do this."
Steve: "The best that comes into our world each week. This is the only one that is never, ever canned before fully being reviewed by yours truly."
Reader: "It's excellent so please don't pollute the content with boring mainstream financial 'waffle' and adverts for stuff we don't want!"
Don Stammer, leading Australian economist: "Congratulations to all associated. It deserves the good following it has."
Reader: "Carry on as you are - well done. The average investor/SMSF trustee needs all the help they can get."
Reader: "Keep it up - the independence is refreshing and is demonstrated by the variety of well credentialed commentators."
Noel Whittaker, author and financial adviser: "A fabulous weekly newsletter that is packed full of independent financial advice."
Australian Investors Association: "Australia's foremost independent financial newsletter for professionals and self-directed investors."
Ian Silk, CEO, AustralianSuper: "It has become part of my required reading: quality thinking, and (mercifully) to the point."
Reader: "Love it, just keep doing what you are doing. It is the right length too, any longer and it might become a bit overwhelming."
Reader: "Congratulations on a great focussed news source. Australia has a dearth of good quality unbiased financial and wealth management news."
Reader: "I subscribe to two newsletters. This is my first read of the week. Thank you. Excellent and please keep up the good work!"
Rob Henshaw: "When I open my computer each day it's the first link I click - a really great read."
John Pearce, Chief Investment Officer, Unisuper: "Out of the (many many) investmentrelated emails I get, Cuffelinks is one that I always open."
This is a short survey on your attitudes to Labor's proposal to deny refunds of franking credits, other than for exempt groups such as pensioners. It should take less than two minutes to complete, and you are welcome to add comments.
We will publish the results next week.
Create your own user feedback survey
harry March 3, 2019 at 7:12 PM # "There already exists sustainable taxation. Tax receipts rose by 6.7% last year, well ahead of inflation.": I checked this over a longer period, 2014 to present (44th parliament on) using: https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/2b690e28-8239-48c6-a71d-2658f37d51d7/resource/c21aa248-ec4c-4b5b-9b1b-6d545a55e399/download/1.-income-statement.xlsx I found 5.76%: https://docdro.id/JNVYvui Like with all volatile data, the estimate is not exact; less so for shorter periods. Tax rising faster than inflation. If expenditure is less than revenue and rising slower than revenue then debt would be reduced. Perhaps harry is correct and Labor does not need to damage dividend imputation - just wait for the rivers of gold.
"If expenditure is less than revenue and rising slower than revenue then debt would be reduced.": I found expenditure increasing at 3.46%: https://docdro.id/XGnLxST
From 2014, revenue up 5.76% per year from 2014, expend up 3.46% per year: https://docdro.id/XGnLxST Now trend revenue = expend. If trend continues, in 1 year there will be a surplus of: =12 * ((1 + 5.76%) - (1 + 3.46%)) * $39,400M =$10,874M
I going to cancel my health fund if Labour gets in power.
That’s exactly what I am going to do as well Mia. I’ll also be telling the charities that I regularly give to, that if this Labor proposal is introduced, I’ll be reluctantly curtailing, if not completely ceasing, my donations to them.
Mia and Ted, That will show them. May you have good health.
It seems to me that the knock on effect of this proposed policy will have a larger impact that it was first thought and ultimately counterproductive to its main intent. Mainstream investors will simply rearrange their portfolio accordingly while the battlers will lose out big time.
Philip, companies deduct tax from the shareholders’ dividends pending completion of the shareholders’ tax returns when any adjustment is made. It works like withholding tax, so the shareholders are in fact paying tax. It’s deducted from dividends just like PAYG is deducted from employees’ incomes pending completion of their tax returns.
If you don’t bank any money, you can’t go to the bank and ask for money via a withdrawal. If you don’t personally pay tax, how can you expect a tax refund?
If your employer banked your wages, you can go to the bank and not only ask but actually withdraw money. If your employer paid tax on your wage, you can expect a tax credit when you lodge your tax return. A refund if over paid. If your company paid tax on your dividends, you can expect a tax credit when you lodge your tax return. A refund if over paid. In no case did you personally pay. It is an inevitable consequence of being an employee or a shareholder that your employee or company must, by law, pay mandated tax which will be credited to employee or shareholder.
But if my employer puts money in my bank account I can absolutely go to the bank and ask for money via a withdrawal. I just did that very thing. But I didn't "personally" bank any money. Your use of the word "personally" is where your specious analogy fails. As has been pointed out endlessly on these pages by many people - the tax is imputed to the shareholder. Now you can not like that all you want but that's the way it is.
Because the company has already paid the tax ATO is simply holding it for me I paid tax for 40 years and plenty of it.
If I don't personally pay tax, then why does the gross total of the dividends, 30% which I personally didn't receive appear on my personal tax form? Why does a person on the highest marginal rate get to claim that 30% of the gross dividends that they didn't personally receive are "payment" for the 47% in taxes they owe on their gross investment income but mine just simply disappear.
Philip, the analogy you use is simply not applicable to a tax system. PAYG players do this all the time. The ATO estimates your income for the next year and taxes you. But if you don’t earn that income you get it back - even if you have a zero tax rate, you get a refund. With dividends it’s similar to that. The system taxes you at 30% until you do your tax return, then if you’ve overpaid tax you get it back. If you’ve underpaid (ie you are on the 45% bracket) you pay more. The imputation system integrates the personal and company tax systems. That’s going to require an adjustment when the individual does their return. It works, it’s right, it shouldn’t be meddled with.
I am a 76 year old self-funded retiree who relies on income from a carefully constructed share portfolio over many years I go to gym , pay private health cover , and pay many other expenses incurred by people my age For the financial year 2017 /18 my refund due to imputed credits obtained by my Accountant was $4435.00 Some retiree tax now that I will lose that Redistribution is the aim of all left-wing socialist Governments Peter Turnbull
I am not an age pensioner
It would be interesting to canvass if a person did not agree with Labor's franking policy and that same policy will affect them detrimentally, and that same person considered themselves a regular labor voter, would that same person consider changing their vote at the upcoming election because of this issue alone. Given the polls though and that the policy does not affect pensioners, the issue probably doesn't rate high enough for labor to modify their proposal.
Hi Alan, I don't quite fit the profile but I am a swing voter (I have never understood followers of a party irrespective of the candidate or policies of the day) in a swing seat. The policy detrimentally impacts both my parents and though not myself, I still think the policy is unfair. Because of this issue alone my vote is not impacted as I believe there are larger issues of government to weigh up. As an aside I care about sustainable taxation and I am not being presented with an alternative from the Coalition.
There already exists sustainable taxation. Tax receipts rose by 6.7% last year, well ahead of inflation. They rose by 6.9% the year before, they are forecast to rise 7.3% next year. That's the current numbers from the last Liberal budget, looks sustainable to me, and you don't need to trash investment and retirement plans of millions of Australians to achieve it.
Hi harry, tax receipts versus inflation isn't relevant but rather against expenditure. It is a shame the intergerational report isn't conducted more frequently by Treasury which last forecast, based on current legislation, an issue but not so based on 'proposed' changes which haven't eventuated in full (as always happens).
If only there was a way of governments to control their expenditure ...
We have based our retirement income heavily on franked income. Not having these credits will decrease our income by 10 percent.
What did the tax reviews have to say? Can we base policies on expertise rather than vote buying with consequences.?
One of the questions asks what options are being considered to mitigate against the consequences of Labor's policy - to facilitate a more granular response, this should probably be divided into 2 components: 1. Investments inside super 2. Investments outside super.
Labor justified its franking credits policy based on the cost rising 10-fold since 2001 and heading towards unaffordable levels. But were the numbers right and would the savings ever have eventuated?
Investors whose income may be hit by Labor's franking credits proposal can reallocate away from fully franked dividends to other investments to maintain their income, but it will involve different risks.
Listed companies often raise capital around the same time they pay dividends and return capital to shareholders, but proposed legislation may prevent companies paying franked dividends during a capital funding.
The ATO has released all the superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2024. Here's what’s changing and what’s not, and some key considerations and opportunities in the lead up to 30 June and beyond.
Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.
Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise.
Being rich is having a high-paying job and accumulating fancy houses and cars, while being wealthy is owning assets that provide passive income, as well as freedom and flexibility. Knowing the difference can reframe your life.
Investor disgust, consolidation, de-listings, price discounts, activist investors entering - it’s what typically happens at business cycle troughs, and it’s happening to LICs now. That may present a potential opportunity.
The $3 million super tax will capture retired, and soon to retire, public servants and politicians who are members of defined benefit superannuation schemes. Lobbying efforts for exemptions to the tax are intensifying.
How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.
The US market has pummelled Australia's over the past 16 years and for good reason: it has some incredible businesses. Australia does too, but if you want to enjoy US-type returns, you need to know where to look.
As long as the banks have no desire to pay up for term deposit funding - which looks likely for a while yet - investors will continue to pay a premium for the higher yielding, but riskier hybrid instrument.
The rise of the Magnificent Seven and their large weighting in US indices has led to debate about concentration risk in markets. Whatever your view, the crowding into these stocks poses several challenges for global investors.
Money can bolster our joy in real ways. However, if we relentlessly chase wealth at the expense of other facets of well-being, history and science both teach us that it will lead to a hollowing out of life.
The copper market is barrelling towards a significant deficit and price surge over the next few decades that investors should not discount when looking at the potential for artificial intelligence and renewable energy.
Global REITs have been out of favour for some time. While office remains a concern, the rest of the sector is in good shape and offers compelling value, with many REITs trading below underlying asset replacement costs.