Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 188

How Trump drives high business expectations

The surprise election of Donald Trump electrified financial markets and pushed the Dow above 20,000 for the first time. The prospect of the Republican Party controlling all three branches of the US government, combined with Donald Trump’s fiery pledges to cut corporate tax rates and embark on large-scale infrastructure spending programmes, has driven equity markets, the US dollar and US interest rates significantly higher. Financial markets around the world now anticipate substantial fiscal easing and a programme of deregulation under the new administration.

The segment of the US economy most buoyed by the election result is small business. This section of the economy was frustrated by the re-election of Barack Obama in 2012 and the resulting political stalemate that followed. In contrast, the election of Trump, with his narrative of deregulation, lower taxes and the repatriation of American jobs, has driven future expectations in this part of the economy to near euphoric levels.

Maximum business optimism

The chart below (next page) shows the US National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) Small Business Optimism Index, for which data has been collected for since 1973. In December 2016, the month following Trump’s election, the index rose to 105.8, the highest reading since December 2004.

On a month-on-month basis, two of the 10 underlying components in this index accounted for 73% of total index gains: the outlook for business conditions and expectations for real sales growth.

Small business accounts for 49% of private-sector employment in the US and 46% of private sector output. It is a section of the economy that feels it has largely missed out on the current economic expansion. Aggressive monetary easing from the US Fed has pushed asset prices to record highs and interest rates to effectively zero (in real terms) for large borrowers. However, such actions have a limited impact on small businesses which hold few assets and which, eight years after the financial crisis, still struggle to secure financing.

NFIB Small Business Optimism Index

Source: NFIB Small Business Trends, December 2016

The bullish arguments underpinning the current market rally are thus based on the idea that the small business sector might now begin to participate in the economic recovery in earnest. Such participation could create a virtuous self-reinforcing cycle, with increasing aggregate demand putting to work latent economic capacity and lifting employment and wages, the effect of which would be to further increase aggregate demand. The idea is thus that the small business sector might now provide a new leg to the current economic expansion (already the third longest post-war US expansion on record) and the equity bull market that has ridden alongside it.

The audacity of hope

Sentiment-driven market rallies ultimately require the fundamentals to follow. The NFIB Small Business Optimism survey consists of 10 underlying index components, and it is telling that almost all of its gains have been driven by expectation components as opposed to hard metrics such as capital spending or employment gains. The NFIB report notes,

“Optimistic consumers and business owners are more likely to bet (spend and hire) on a future that seems to hold promise, but to maintain the enthusiasm, reality will play an important supporting role. The appearance of a new customer is much more powerful than the expectation of one”.

Since the election of Trump until the time of writing (26 January 2017), the S&P 500 has risen by 7.9% while the Russell 2000, an index that measures the small-cap segment of the US equity market, has risen by 16.0%. In tandem, US government 10-year yields have risen by 0.66%, while the US dollar index reached a 14-year high during December, although it has since retraced some of those gains. These are not insignificant moves and it is worth reflecting on what markets have now priced in, ahead of any actual action being forthcoming.

Whatever your views on Trump, he has put forward scant detail on what his economic policies will entail and which ones he will actually pursue (can you simultaneously build a wall, repeal Obamacare and cut corporate taxes?). It is fair to wonder therefore, how much of his agenda he will actually be able to implement.

In 2008, Barack Obama arrived into office also promising a revolution in Washington. Like Trump, he too led a party that controlled all three branches of government. Eight years on, few people today would say that Obama’s legacy has matched his incoming rhetoric of reform. Unlike Obama, Trump arrives into office with the lowest approval ratings ever for an incoming president.

Only Donald Trump (and hopefully Donald Trump) knows what a Trump presidency entails. Since his election, the market has broadly had to consider three key new policy agendas for the incoming administration: i) growth-supportive fiscal easing, ii) increased market protectionism and iii) new geo-political concerns.

To date the market has focused almost exclusively on the first of these. While fiscal easing certainly has the potential to stimulate growth, the established economic consensus is that protectionist policies shrink the aggregate economic pie. Meanwhile, it will be instructive to see how markets respond to, say, a military incident in the South China Sea.

For the market rally to sustain itself and move higher, reality will need to catch up to hope. Donald Trump is certainly a new kind of politician, but his promises to deliver a new kind of politics are not. Markets are probably correct to be anticipating a programme of (unfunded) fiscal stimulus. However, how much of this is already in asset-market pricing, and what is the impact to US growth and market sentiment from the enactment of some of the protectionist policies Trump has championed?

 

Miles Staude is Portfolio Manager at the Global Value Fund (ASX:GVF), which he manages from London. This article is the personal opinion of the writer and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

  •   2 February 2017
  • 1
  •      
  •   
1 Comments
Emma
February 02, 2017

Great graphical illustration there Miles. Great piece, thank you.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.