Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 1

We live in interesting times: the game-changers in 2013

The superannuation, advice and investing landscape is facing more game-changers than at any time since the introduction of compulsory superannuation in 1992. Cuffelinks will be covering these subjects regularly during 2013 and beyond, including:

  • the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms, especially the ban on conflicted remuneration and the best interests test. The exemption for stockbrokers and licensing of accountants for self managed super funds (SMSFs) ensures significant competition for financial planners
  • changing demographics, where an ageing population will be supported by fewer workers, leading to acute pressure on funding of health services, education and pensions, and perhaps future intergenerational conflict
  • unprecedented margins above bill and swap rates paid by Australian banks as they switch billions of dollars of funding from fragile offshore bond markets to local deposits
  • continuing growth of SMSFs, now approaching two spectacular milestones: one million members and $500 billion in funds under management
  • the evolution of non-platform technology to manage investment portfolios, throwing out a serious challenge to the dominant platforms
  • doubts about the health of many of the (formerly) best sovereign credits in the market. In Europe, the United States and Japan, governments have lived beyond their means, with no solutions to their debt woes in sight
  • the loss of trust in active management and the move towards exchange-traded funds, index funds and self management of portfolios, removing the more lucrative fees from many parts of the industry
  • the introduction of MySuper, available from 1 July 2013, where default super payments will be paid into a simple, low fee, diversified fund
  • rationalising of many parts of the industry, including mergers of industry funds and acquisitions of financial planning groups by major institutions
  • the losses in equity markets prior to the recent rally, which prompted a significant switch into defensive investments. Lower rates on bank term deposits are now encouraging a recycling back to equities, particularly high dividend-paying stocks
  • the possibility of further changes in superannuation regulations, including taxes on withdrawals, and the impact such moves will have on the confidence of people saving to fund their own retirement.

The medium to long term consequences for the wealth management industry will be immense, and are already playing out. In September 2012, the $46 billion AustralianSuper became the latest major industry fund to announce plans to build an internal team to manage Australian equities, to reduce its costs. Their study of about 100 external equity managers showed only five had added value over a benchmark in the last decade.

Many fund managers are struggling in the face of declining fees and rising costs. Boutique manager Lodestar Capital closed on 1 July 2012, returning $100 million to investors. The previously high-flying GMO shut its Australian equity business in April 2012 after 14 years of operation, and over at Treasury Group, Global Value Investors, an offshoot of long-standing Investors Mutual, closed in November 2011. Some well-established and highly regarded names, such as Kerr Neilson’s Platinum Asset Management, once the dominant manager for retail flows into global equities, have experienced heavy outflows. He started an August 2012 newsletter to clients with the refreshingly honest words, “We are well aware we have done a poor job over the last two years in managing some of our funds.” In the previous financial year, Platinum funds fell from $17.8 billion to $14.9 billion, due to negative investment returns and outflows, although more recent performance has improved considerably. Listed K2 Asset Management saw a decline from almost a billion dollars in funds at the end of 2010 to $693 million by the end of 2012. In a market which once welcomed newcomers, only an established name like former Perpetual stalwart John Sevior can expect to attract large amounts in a start-up.

The financial advice industry has traditionally relied heavily on payments from product providers, especially the major retail platforms, but these are falling in preparation for FOFA. Where an adviser could once rely on an annual trail of, say, 60 basis points, or $600 on a $100,000 portfolio, to subsidise the cost of providing advice, now advisers are having to convince clients to pay directly. Investment Trends recently reported that the average planner is now charging $2,350 for comprehensive advice compared to $2,600 in 2010. When Barry Lambert sold Count to the Commonwealth Bank, he cited the FOFA reforms and market uncertainty among the reasons for moving away from the previously sacred independence.

On product development, every public superannuation business in the country is currently working on the design and implementation of MySuper options. There are major differences in interpretation of the legislation, which at one extreme could lead to large switches from existing funds into MySuper funds. The design imperative of low fees will boost index-type offers, and many will take a lead from ING's Living Super which keeps management costs down by investing in deposits for its bank.

But the granddaddy of all these issues, the one that will be with us forever, is demographic change, especially due to people living longer. It brings with it implications for product design, as investors move from accumulation to pension and prefer income over growth. It affects asset allocation, and is causing widespread reviews of the traditional 70% growth/30% defensive default option. It is the responsibility of everyone in the industry to convince their clients that they cannot assume future governments will have the finances to meet current day levels of pension and health support. If the terms of trade become less favourable and reduce the tax flows from the resources sector, it’s likely that those who do not fund their own retirement will face declining living standards just when they are at their most vulnerable. These are the baby boomers who expect to buy whatever they want when they want it, not spend frugally and within their means as the post-war generation lived.

Further complicating the ability to plan for retirement is the threat of more changes to superannuation regulations, likely to be a high profile issue in the run up to a federal election on 14 September. It will be a challenging and exciting year for everyone in financial services and their clients.

 

4 Comments
Harry Chemay
December 17, 2013

Remarkably prescient Graham. Game-changers of 2013 indeed. Interesting to re-read this piece now that the year is winding up.

You were definitely right about MySuper. It ended up being the key focus of most large super funds for much of the year. The range of solutions created (from the straight re-badge of an existing investment option to the creation of a life-cycle based solution with 19 (yup, count 'em) separate cohorts), the Standard Risk Measure, the Product Dashboard. This has been a year to remember at the big end of town. 2014 looks likely to be no less busy.

At the other end of the spectrum SMSFs did indeed crack the $500bn mark, although a tad later than my Q1 guesstimate. Fund rollovers to SMSFs appear to have slowed, partly I suspect due to strong returns posted by retail and profit-for-member funds since 2012.

And what about the advisory industry? From all accounts the planning industry has assumed the change of government will result in an inevitable roll-back of much of the FoFA legislation. Many appear to be acting as if the new Part 7.7A provisions of the Corps Act have already been repealed. They haven't, and so as it stands a planner still needs to put a (post 1 July) new client's interests ahead of his/her own, or that of his/her employer. FoFA does not now stand for 'Free of Further Annoyance'.

Finally Graham (and Chris Cuffe) you are right to bang on about the decumulation wave that is gathering momentum, a 'fait accompli' resulting from retiring boomers, the oldest of which are now well north of 65. With 252,000 people turning 65 in 2012, and the current 3 million Australians over 65 expected to growth to 4.2 million by 2020, the need to address issues such as dependency ratios and longevity risk is acute. I enjoyed the contributions to this important topic made by both of you, as well as by others such as David Bell and Bruce Gregor this year.

Congrats on the great initiative that is Cuffelinks. I look forward to more stimulating content and debate in 2014.

http://yahoo.com
February 08, 2013

Whatever honestly moved u to publish “the game-changers
in 2013 | Cuffelinks”? I genuinely liked it! Thanks ,Charley

John Peters
February 07, 2013

An interesting conclusion that one could be drawn from Graham's comments about bigger funds moving more to indexed funds is that, particularly as the pool sizes get larger, the ability for asset class specific managers to outperform their benchmarks becomes harder. Even splitting these up and sending smaller parcels to a number of smaller managers should result in the diversification having brought you back to the index (but only more costly).

Once again it shifts the focus away from the stock selection to asset allocation.

In the 90s MLC and BT maintained dominance in the performance rankings because of their asset allocations (MLC allocating once a year on Frank Russell's advice and BT living on the coat-tails of picking the 1987 crash). I believe that if you are looking for who will be the best performing funds over the next few years the trick is to look for what their asset allocations are, find the ones that differ from the norm and try to understand why this is so. Get this right, as some did with the Infrastructure Market, and you provide real opportunity to outperform.

Whitney Drayton
February 05, 2013

Just when retail investors flee from stocks to bonds, we are seeing institutional investors migrate from active equity management to ETF's and index investments. To "de-risk" in 2012, 5 years into a credit contraction and after the worst 3 years of active performance in living memory can only be justified by modestly lowering up-front costs and not based on sound investment logic. Any contrary investor would say that this is precisely the time to increase active equity risk, not hug the benchmark.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Painful transition to FOFA will pay off in the long term

What financial advice is worth paying for?

SMSFs have major role but not for everyone

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Latest Updates

A nation of landlords and fund managers

Super and housing dwarf every other asset class in Australia, and they’ve both become too big to fail. Can they continue to grow at current rates, and if so, what are the implications for the economy, work and markets?

Economy

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Retirement

Retiring debt-free may not be the best strategy

Retiring with debt may have advantages. Maintaining a mortgage on the family home can provide a line of credit in retirement for flexibility, extra income, and a DIY reverse mortgage strategy.

Shares

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

The ASX is shrinking not by accident, but by design. A governance model that rewards detachment over ownership is driving capital into private hands and weakening public markets.

Investment strategies

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

The AI boom has sparked investor euphoria, but under the surface, US big tech is showing cracks - slowing growth, surging capex, and fading dominance signal it's time to question conventional tech optimism.

Investment strategies

Resilience is the new alpha

Trade is now a strategic weapon, reshaping the investment landscape. In this environment, resilient companies - those capable of absorbing shocks and defending margins - are best positioned to outperform.

Shares

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

The next generation of wealth creation is likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. Four signs can alert investors to these companies before the crowds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.