Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 506

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 506 with weekend update

  •   27 April 2023
  • 5
  •      
  •   

The Weekend Edition includes a market update plus Morningstar adds links to two additional articles.

Every country develops differently. Each takes a unique path guided by its leaders, its institutions, its people, its rules and regulations, its taxes and incentives and ... that awkward word bandied around which is difficult to define ... its culture. In last week's release of the Reserve Bank Review, the most informative sections are not about the marginal changes in the number of economists involved in setting interest rates. The preoccupation with this headline-grabbing change is misplaced.

Rather, it is the description of the culture of the central bank which is most revealing, defined as follows:

"High-performing institutions have a culture that is aligned with their strategic direction. Culture is the shared values and beliefs that guide how members of an organisation approach their work and interact with each other (Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet 2019). It lies at the heart of how organisations work. Important drivers of culture include the structure, systems (including governance), organisational policies and leadership of the organisation. Strategy focuses the organisation’s actions and decision making."

A substantial section of the Review is devoted to culture, and there are so many criticisms of leadership styles and hierarchy that it is difficult to see how Philip Lowe, at the Reserve Bank for 43 years and Governor since 2016, can implement the changes required. The Review even describes confusion between responsibilities for monetary policy and running the institution:

“formal roles and responsibilities relating to risk governance are somewhat unclear, with responsibility split between the Governor, the Reserve Bank Board and the Payments System Board.”

The interviews with staff identified:

"- risk aversion, which in this context shifts accountability or blame for potential mistakes
- lack of clear accountability
- a culturally ingrained deference to authority
- incentives that reward individuals for analytical output and those who appear to be across technical issues, resulting in resistance among some managers to genuinely delegate and empower team members.”

The Review also says decision-making is "highly concentrated in the Governor with limited board oversight” and:

"The Reserve Bank Board has not voted against a recommendation of the RBA executive in at least the last decade." 

We focus on this most important part of the Review, the Reserve Bank's 'culture club', where decisions are made at the top and different views are discouraged. Philip Lowe wants to stay as Governor when his term ends in September 2023, and while he may be asking (to quote Boy George) "Do you really want to hurt me?", Treasurer Jim Chalmers is most likely to respond “Precious people always tell me that’s a step, a step too far."

A second article this week also dives into the Reserve Bank Review from a different perspective than other parts of the media, and while no less critical, disagrees with my article on the merits of some changes. You be the judge. Isaac Gross from Monash University is especially scathing of the lack of oversight by the Board, and the quality of its decisions, quoting:

"The Reserve Bank Board did not receive any written briefings proposing calendar-based forward guidance before it was introduced by the Governor in a speech in mid-October 2020."

As an aside, we have received several comments saying that while the Reserve Bank was wrong to hold rates low until May 2022, nobody was criticising them in late 2021. I'd like to point to at least one piece I wrote on 2 December 2021

"Prudential regulators allowed the market to run too strongly over late 2020 and this year with 2021 house prices up around 26% in Sydney, Brisbane and Canberra. Financial stability should not be a boom and bust which pushes thousands out of the housing market while making others even wealthier, and encouraging those who enter the market to take on vast amounts of debt and struggle to withstand rate rises."

France protests, Australia relaxes on age pensions

While we are looking at culture, it is now a notable point in time when the eligibility for the age pension in Australia is about to increase to 67 (for people born after 1 January 1957) with few if any protests, while there is massive disruption and property damage in France as President Macron pushes through an increase in eligibility age from 62 to 64. We are running a quick survey question on why the French are protesting while Australians are sanguine. Are we more American than European in our commitment to work harder and longer?

And we've thrown in a third question, which asks about a suitable level of unemployment benefit (JobKeeper or the dole) in Australia.

It's strange that a Labor Government, able to find funding for submarines, missiles, a football stadium in Hobart, war memorials, art galleries, Stage 3 tax cuts ... they seem to announce a new spending programme every day ... plays hard ball on unemployment benefits. The Government's own Economic Inclusion Advisory Group recommended that JobSeeker increase to 90% of the age pension from 60%, a rise of $18 a day. Former Treasury Secretary Ken Henry calls the current rate 'cruel'. The Australian Financial Review reports:

"Four federal Labor MPs have broken ranks to join calls for the government to increase the JobSeeker payment by $24 billion (over four years) at next month’s federal budget. The move came as the Government hinted it may increase the $50-a-day payment by a little in the May 9 budget, but not to the levels demanded by the welfare sector."

A Resolve Strategic Poll in Nine’s Sunday papers last weekend found on raising the amount paid to unemployed people: 43% support, 31% oppose, 26% undecided. Let us know what you think in the third question in our survey. If Grattan's numbers are correct, we seem mean on global standards, although international comparisons are notoriously difficult. Is this a reflection on the Australian 'culture'?

Three more significant charts this week.

We have previously highlighted the fall in money circulating in the system and its impact on inflation, economic activity and interest rates, and levels we are now seeing normally lead the major slowdowns.

And we have never seen traders willing to pay so much (1.4%) on a Credit Default Swap (CDS) to protect against the US Government not meeting its debt repayment obligations as they fall due. This is not a highly liquid market compared with the US Treasury market, but it reflects concerns about the political impasse on the US debt ceiling, which is usually worked through.

Finally, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (one of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks in the US) runs a recession probability model and it is now at its highest since 1982. A cheery thought to end on.

On the Reserve Bank meeting next week to decide on the cash rate, economists seem split 50/50 on whether this week's fall in inflation is enough to continue the pause. Either way, the current cash rate is 3.6% and the three-year bond rate is below 3%, so the market thinks rate reductions are only a matter of time.

Graham Hand

Also in this week's edition ...

We lead this week with James Gruber, who asks the question: should you give your children their inheritance before you die? It's a touchy subject that’s likely to get discussed more often as Baby Boomers in Australia grow older, die richer, leave behind larger bequests and the Bank of Mum and Dad is required to finance more homes. James investigates the pros and cons of the debate, including a review of a recent book advocating that people should ‘die with zero’.

There’s nothing income-oriented investors love more than high-yielding stocks, although Karen Watkin and colleagues at AllianceBernstein warn that these stocks may not offer the best returns through the market cycle. Traditional dividend stocks tend to be more defensive, with relatively stable business models and stronger balance sheets. These are great qualities during periods of market stress yet not as beneficial when markets turn.

Superannuation has been receiving plenty of negative press recently, but Ross Clare and ASFA suggest it’s serving Australia well. It’s substantially improving retirement incomes for nearly two million retired Australians by providing regular income streams. And it's also easing the burden on the government to fund retirements.

A recent Treasury Department statement on tax spending includes franking credits, which may be a coincidence or something more ominous. Tony Dillon isn’t sure which, yet he makes the case for why the Labor Government shouldn't target refundable franked credits to raise revenue.

Two extra articles from Morningstar for the weekend. Joshua Peach looks at three ASX stocks that fund managers are buying, while Abhinav Davuluri highlights a wide-moat US-listed tech stock that's still cheap even after a 60% rally. 

And in this week's White Paper, Magellan Asset Management outline why it's bullish on US payments heavyweight, Mastercard.

***

Weekend market update

From AAP Netdesk:

The local bourse snapped its longest losing streak in 10 months after better-than-expected earnings reports from US tech titans, even as economic data painted a gloomy picture for the world's biggest economy. The benchmark S&P/ASX200 index on Friday finished up 16.5 points, or 0.23%, to 7,309.2.

The real estate sector was the biggest gainer, rising 1.1%. Mirvac climbed 3.4% to a nearly two-month high of $2.41 as the property developer said it had retained 97.5% occupancy across its portfolio in the March quarter.

In tech, Megaport had soared 41.5% to a nearly two-month high of $5.63 after the cloud computing company announced its attempts to right-size its finances were paying off, and it now expects to make around double the consensus expectations of $9 million for 2022/23.

In the heavyweight financial sector all of the Big Four banks were higher.
ANZ added 1% to $24.35, Westpac climbed 0.9% to $22.47, NAB grew 0.4% to $28.84 and CBA finished 0.3% higher at $99.36.

The materials sector closed up 0.5%, with gains for the iron ore giants and lithium miners but losses for most goldminers. BHP added 0.2% to $44, Fortescue climbed 0.4% to $20.94 and Rio Tinto edged 0.1% higher at $112.25.
Lithium miner Pilbara finished up 7.1% to $4.24 on a quarterly update, while Northern Star ended down 3% to $13.46 as gold prices slipped on the prospect of another rate rise.

Coles fell 1.4% to $18.20 as the supermarket giant reported third-quarter group sales rose 6.5% to $9.7 billion, in the final set of results for CEO Steven Cain before he's replaced by Leah Weckert.

From Shane Oliver, AMP:

Global share markets were mixed over the last week with US shares initially down but then boosted by tech sector earnings to be up 0.9% and Japanese shares rose 1%, but Eurozone shares fell 0.9% and Chinese shares fell 0.1%. 

Shares have had a good start to the year – with global shares up 8.5% and Australian shares up 3.8% - and falling inflation is a big positive, but the going may get a bit rough over the next few months. Bank stress is continuing to impact in the US with concerns about First Republic escalating again suggesting the issue may still not be contained, the US debt ceiling issue is starting to hot up, inflation likely won’t fall in a straight line, recession risks remain high and the period from May to September is often rough for shares.

Australian shares are likely to be caught up in this as the recovery in China is so far less commodity intensive than thought earlier this year which partly explains the local market’s relative underperformance so far this year. Investor concerns about the need to raise the US debt ceiling are likely to escalate. 

Following significant falls in inflation in the US, Canada and New Zealand, Australian inflation is now also falling, adding to confidence we have seen the peak. CPI inflation fell back to 7%yoy and trimmed mean inflation fell to 6.6%yoy with both below RBA forecasts. While another RBA hike on Tuesday can’t be ruled out given RBA concerns about wages growth and faster population growth adding to housing related inflation and rising wealth, on balance we expect the RBA to leave rates on hold for May. Either way, from later this year or early next we anticipate rate cuts to deal with a slowing economy.

 

Curated by James Gruber and Leisa Bell

 

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Listed Investment Company (LIC) Indicative NTA Report from Bell Potter

LIC Monthly Report from Morningstar

Monthly Investment Products update from ASX

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

5 Comments
Sven
April 28, 2023

TonyD and FTPM should not argue the past but focus on the present. Negative real interest rates are a failed experiment by modern monetary theorists. Philip Lowe or his replacement need to come clean with the Australian public and discuss a shift back to positive real interest rates! It is as simple as that we need to stop wasteful spending and invest in what the country needs. More public private partnership low cost dwellings, water movement, sensible energy investment, road and rail improvement. And this is all before we consider what industries to support strengthen and rebuild. It is a complete waste of money to support white elephants such as Australia's submarine fleet. We need to strengthen out army improve our border patrol via boats and drones.

TonyD
April 28, 2023

RBA insularity was evident decades ago. So the reforms while timid, are more than timely.

In your essentially correct commentary in 2021 on prudential regulation, you can't lay the blame at the feet of the RBA, which was stripped of its prudential role decades ago. APRA's failure to apply lending controls and the narrow vision of the RBA's interest rate policy, could have been overcome by an activist Federal government seriously concerned with financial stability and a coherent housing policy.

Even so, we should not forget the role the RBA played in deliberately triggering the damaging recession of the early 1990s, and it's failure to regulate the banks' profligate lending in the 1980s, which together pushed the banking system to the edge.

Former Treasury policy maker
April 28, 2023

TonyD,

the RBA triggered the recession - which we 'had to have' you will recall - because inflation had completely gotten out of hand in the 1980s and simply had to be brought to heel. Keating's bucking bronco had to be tamed. It was.

As for the alleged failure to regulate bank lending in the 1980s, this was driven by the financial deregulation reforms of the government which were intended to make credit more readily available in a more competitive environment! The power to tell the banks how much to lend had already been taken away from the RBA by then even though they still had prudential oversight.

But in any case, the RBA of 1990 is NOT the RBA that has been reviewed now. A lot of change has taken place, including as you said the taking away of prudential regulation (given to APRA). Under Bernie Fraser (in the role until 1996) then Ian Macfarlane and Glenn Stevens a lot of significant improvements were made to the way the bank determined monetary policy (a clear focus on an inflation target in the context of meeting both their growth and monetary stability objectives, using the cash rate in a very straightforward way to influence the entire interest rate structure), the way the bank then communicated (statements after policy announcements for instance, as well as lots of speeches on the economy, on policy, on regulatory matters, etc), and the way the bank engaged with parliament. In those communications the RBA always made clear that though the cash rate was the policy tool over which they had control, it had to be set and seen in the context of fiscal policy and microeconomic policy. Speech after speech and parliamentary presentation after parliamentary presentation made this abundantly clear. You cannot blame the RBA for the failure of other policy makers in those regards.

What the RBA may or may not have done in the 1980's is ancient history and not a factor in any assessment of whether the RBA is fit for purpose going forward from 2023.

TonyD
April 28, 2023

Fair comment FTPM ;) But my point is that the recent failures are legacies of past practices. The RBA legislated mandate includes maintenance of full employment, but it has never let that get in the way of hammering jobs no matter what the cost.

Allan
April 28, 2023

Hi Graham. Whilst "...there may be only one answer..." featuring in the penultimate sentence of your Editor's Note, it's no (cr)edit to you in your overdoing it with that which follows. ;>)

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

Taxpayers betrayed by Future Fund debacle

The Future Fund's original purpose was to meet the unfunded liabilities of Commonwealth defined benefit schemes. These liabilities have ballooned to an estimated $290 billion and taxpayers continue to be treated like fools.

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

The nuts and bolts of testamentary trusts

Unlike family trusts, testamentary trusts are activated posthumously, empowering you to exert post-death control over your assets. Learn how testamentary trusts offer unique benefits and protective measures.

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

Are mega super funds’ returns set to fall?

While the performance of the largest super funds has been admirable, they’ve become so big that it will make it difficult for them to outperform their benchmarks in future. It will be important for you to pick your fund wisely.

Latest Updates

The 20 most popular articles of 2024

Check out the most-read Firstlinks articles from 2024. From '16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever', to 'The best strategy to build income for life', and 'Where baby boomer wealth will end up', there's something for all.

Shares

2025: Another bullish year ahead for equities?

2024 was a banner year for equities, with a run-up in US tech stocks broadening into a global market rally, and the big question now is whether the good times can continue? History suggests optimism is warranted.

Strategy

Is travel your best investment?

Is travel a luxury or a priceless investment? Reflecting on decades of family adventures and solo journeys, this explores how intentional travel creates cherished memories, meaningful connections, and personal growth.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.