Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 572

What are the key trends in global dividend income?

Q2 continued the positive trend, providing great news for retirees invested globally for income. Global markets are up nearly +15% YTD (MSCI World in AUD), and although Q2 was relatively flat with respect to total return, there was +6.5% (in AUD terms) dividend growth.

When comparing Q2 2024 to Q2 2023, dividends grew +6.3% in local currency terms, with only a marginal boost to +6.5% when revalued in AUD.

Global developed market companies had a strong quarter, paying out A$807 billion of dividends.

The number of companies cutting to zero remained low in Q2 (5.4%). This supports our ongoing view of continued dividend strength from global equities.


Source: Factset

Over half, 56.8%, of dividend paying companies increased or initiated dividends when compared to the same quarter last year. The number of companies decreasing payouts remained relatively constant, at 10.6%.

We continue to see large companies, for example Nestle, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton and Microsoft increase their dividends per share and distribute large dollar payouts. In addition, businesses that omitted dividends in the pandemic and tentatively paid special dividends, are now back to regular distributions. One example is HSBC holdings, who in addition to the now regular dividend paid a special dividend given the completed sale of their Canadian business to RBC.

Two of the three regions increased income, in AUD terms, when comparing Q2 to the previous corresponding period in 2023. (North America +5.4%, Europe +9.1%, Asia -4.8%).

Which countries are leading the charge?

Q2 is traditionally when many large single dividends are paid in Europe. Europe was responsible for over half of the income in the most recent quarter, with over 30% from Germany, France and the UK alone. When comparing Q2 2024 with Q2 2023 we saw strong growth in many countries, including Italy (34%), UK (+23%) and France (+11%). This was partially offset by cuts in Sweden (-23%) and Finland (-22%).

The US grew dividends over +7% and paid 34% of the overall quarterly income payout.

Australia remained a strong dividend payer, with a small (+1%) growth in dividends, when comparing Q2 2024 with the corresponding period last year. There were significant payouts from the major banks, Westpac (including a special dividend), NAB and ANZ, backed up by large percentage increases in the dividend payouts of Aristocrat Leisure and Stockland.


Source: Factset

What happened in global sectors?

There was considerable difference in sector payouts. Communication services (+38%) led the charge, followed by increases from Financials (+15%), Consumer Discretionary (+12%) and IT (+11%).

Whilst growth sector dividends reflected strong market returns, more defensive sectors, who have had weaker total return, had softer payouts (Real Estate +0%, Utilities -1.5%).

Communication services got a substantial boost from large businesses that initiated dividend payments in 2024 (Alphabet and Meta), reflecting strong company performance and solid balance sheets.

Discretionary companies increased payout, despite rampant cost of living pressures globally. The most significant payouts came from auto and luxury companies, that included Mercedes Benz, Stellantis, Volkswagen, LVMH and Hermes. Although significant in dollar terms BMW decreased dividends per share, due to falling net profit after years of strong dividend increases.

Energy (-6%) and Materials (-18%) companies decreased their payout the most, reflecting weakness in commodity prices. Large dollar decreases came from UK materials business Glencore Plc and US energy company, ConocoPhillips.

Interesting facts in global income

When incorporating dividend cuts and initiations, 3.9 companies increased or initiated dividends for every one company that reduced or completely cut dividends versus the previous corresponding period. This is further proof of dividends continuing to strengthen.

49% of US companies paid a dividend in Q2. Given it is the second quarter, a lot of European countries had a strong percentage of companies paying dividends (France 63%, Germany 65%, Italy 77%, Belgium 88%).


Source: Plato Investment Management

What’s the outlook for global income?

Our model continues to predict a lower-than-average probability of dividend cuts in global developed markets. Dividend growth has been strong, at the market level, despite increased interest rates, cost of living pressures and continuing geopolitical turmoil in Europe and the Middle East.

Materials/Energy significantly decreased dividends in Q2 and remain one of the higher risk areas in the market. After a strong 2022, they have decreased yields on the back of falling commodity prices and challenges to the demand side.

In conclusion

2024 started with incredibly strong market returns, although this moderated in Q2. As we stand halfway through the year, this has been another period of positive dividend growth for investors allocating to global equities.

Recent market returns have been dominated by growth names, and dividend payouts have benefitted from large companies in this space, like Meta and Alphabet, starting to pay dividends. The disparity between yields from different sectors continues to demonstrate the importance of active management, and a strong risk management framework, for income investors.

Methodology

  1. The methodology uses dividends paid, in AUD, however the ex-dividend date is used to allocate the dividends in the relevant time period e.g. Q3 2020.
  2. Dividend paid ($) for each stock in each calendar quarter is calculated as the shares outstanding as of quarter end multiplied by the total gross dividend per share (DPS) paid out in the calendar quarter. The DPS paid excludes spin offs but includes capital returns and special dividends. Conversion to AUD is done using the prevailing WM/Reuters London exchange rates at the time of dividend payment.
  3. Full year dividend paid ($) is the summation of dividend paid ($) from Q1 to Q4 using the methodology (1).
  4. DPS movement is based on total DPS paid out (in local currencies) over each calendar quarter. DPS movement from quarter to quarter is then categorised as initiating, increasing, unchanged, decreasing or cut to zero.
  5. Secondary issues are removed from the calculations to prevent double counting of income.

 

Daniel Pennell is Portfolio Manager of the Plato Global Shares Income Fund.

This article is for general information purposes only. It has been prepared without taking account of any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Any opinions or forecasts reflect the judgment and assumptions of Plato and its representatives on the basis of information at the date of publication and may later change without notice. Any persons relying on this information should obtain professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances, needs and investment objectives.

Plato Investment Management Limited ABN 77 120 730 136 (‘Plato’) AFSL 504616.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

How to use debt recycling to your advantage

The secrets of Australia’s Berkshire Hathaway

The power of dividends

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.