Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 372

Why are companies raising capital during COVID?

The uncertainty about the impact of the pandemic on the business operating environment sparked many capital raisings on stock exchanges around the world. Australia led the world with more than $30 billion raised from the beginning of the year to 4 August 2020. The change to ASX listing rule 7.1, which increased the amount of capital companies could raise in institutional placements from 15% to 25% of issued capital, was a significant measure to provide additional flexibility for ASX-listed companies to efficiently raise capital. The ASX has since extended its temporary capital raising relief to 30 November 2020.

Investors have done well from new issues

Overall, participating in capital raises during the COVID period has yielded strong returns for investors. Recent data by fintech Fresh Equities showed that the average non-weighted return for the 205 placements completed in May and June was 59% to 1 August 2020.

So why are companies seeking to raise capital in the middle of a global pandemic? Some examples include:

  • To boost liquidity as revenue streams temporarily dried up during the pandemic
  • To shore up balance sheets or to help companies bolster their regulatory capital positions, and
  • To pursue opportunities for potential new business ventures or acquisitions that may arise.

During the market downturn in the first half of 2020 investors helped recapitalise companies that were affected by the pandemic. Since the beginning of 2020, Australian Ethical has participated in more than 30 capital raisings with over $60 million in new capital invested. Overall, we have helped recapitalise around 30% of the ASX-listed companies that we own in our actively managed portfolios, with about half of that capital going to companies in the healthcare and IT sectors (areas we are overweight as a result of our Charter).

We also underwrote some capital raises, which meant that if a company was looking to raise $5 million (for example) and only raised $4 million, we agreed to make up the shortfall.

Here are three companies we helped recapitalise in 2020 and their purposes for issuing.

Somnomed – short-term liquidity

Somnomed manufactures and sells devices for the oral treatment of sleep-related disorders in Australia and overseas. The company’s revenue was negatively impacted during lockdown because the diagnosis and referral of patients for its sleep apnoea product was disrupted. Somnomed raised capital to boost its short-term liquidity during the lockdown period and as a long-term holder of the stock, we were happy to participate in the institutional placement.

NAB – balance sheet repair

We invest in two of the major banks, NAB and Westpac. On balance, we believe responsible and well-regulated banks can do good. For instance, while both NAB and Westpac make loans to the fossil fuel industry, they are also significant funders of renewable energy. More than 75% of Westpac’s lending to the electricity sector goes to renewable projects and for NAB the figure is 69%.

We currently assess that Westpac and NAB are implementing their commitment to lend in line with the economic transition our society needs to limit global warming to 2°C. We participated in NAB’s institutional placement of $3 billion announced in April after the bank revealed nearly $1 billion in loan impairments, largely attributable to the COVID crisis.

Janison – new opportunities

Janison is an ‘ed-tech’ company that provides digital learning and assessment platforms that are designed to replace pen and paper. Janison’s technology enables students to take exams at home or on a device in a classroom, positioning it well for the surge in demand for online test taking. We helped the company raise additional capital to pursue new opportunities overseas and at home in Australia, where Janison has recently been selected by the NSW Department of Education to deliver the state’s selective school tests.

As an ethical fund manager, we invest in sustainable companies with good growth prospects that we believe will provide long-term benefits to society. Participating in capital raises is one way we achieve that goal.

 

Deana Mitchell is an equities analyst at Australian Ethical, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers from Australian Ethical, please click here.

 

  •   26 August 2020
  • 3
  •      
  •   
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.