Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 372

Why are companies raising capital during COVID?

The uncertainty about the impact of the pandemic on the business operating environment sparked many capital raisings on stock exchanges around the world. Australia led the world with more than $30 billion raised from the beginning of the year to 4 August 2020. The change to ASX listing rule 7.1, which increased the amount of capital companies could raise in institutional placements from 15% to 25% of issued capital, was a significant measure to provide additional flexibility for ASX-listed companies to efficiently raise capital. The ASX has since extended its temporary capital raising relief to 30 November 2020.

Investors have done well from new issues

Overall, participating in capital raises during the COVID period has yielded strong returns for investors. Recent data by fintech Fresh Equities showed that the average non-weighted return for the 205 placements completed in May and June was 59% to 1 August 2020.

So why are companies seeking to raise capital in the middle of a global pandemic? Some examples include:

  • To boost liquidity as revenue streams temporarily dried up during the pandemic
  • To shore up balance sheets or to help companies bolster their regulatory capital positions, and
  • To pursue opportunities for potential new business ventures or acquisitions that may arise.

During the market downturn in the first half of 2020 investors helped recapitalise companies that were affected by the pandemic. Since the beginning of 2020, Australian Ethical has participated in more than 30 capital raisings with over $60 million in new capital invested. Overall, we have helped recapitalise around 30% of the ASX-listed companies that we own in our actively managed portfolios, with about half of that capital going to companies in the healthcare and IT sectors (areas we are overweight as a result of our Charter).

We also underwrote some capital raises, which meant that if a company was looking to raise $5 million (for example) and only raised $4 million, we agreed to make up the shortfall.

Here are three companies we helped recapitalise in 2020 and their purposes for issuing.

Somnomed – short-term liquidity

Somnomed manufactures and sells devices for the oral treatment of sleep-related disorders in Australia and overseas. The company’s revenue was negatively impacted during lockdown because the diagnosis and referral of patients for its sleep apnoea product was disrupted. Somnomed raised capital to boost its short-term liquidity during the lockdown period and as a long-term holder of the stock, we were happy to participate in the institutional placement.

NAB – balance sheet repair

We invest in two of the major banks, NAB and Westpac. On balance, we believe responsible and well-regulated banks can do good. For instance, while both NAB and Westpac make loans to the fossil fuel industry, they are also significant funders of renewable energy. More than 75% of Westpac’s lending to the electricity sector goes to renewable projects and for NAB the figure is 69%.

We currently assess that Westpac and NAB are implementing their commitment to lend in line with the economic transition our society needs to limit global warming to 2°C. We participated in NAB’s institutional placement of $3 billion announced in April after the bank revealed nearly $1 billion in loan impairments, largely attributable to the COVID crisis.

Janison – new opportunities

Janison is an ‘ed-tech’ company that provides digital learning and assessment platforms that are designed to replace pen and paper. Janison’s technology enables students to take exams at home or on a device in a classroom, positioning it well for the surge in demand for online test taking. We helped the company raise additional capital to pursue new opportunities overseas and at home in Australia, where Janison has recently been selected by the NSW Department of Education to deliver the state’s selective school tests.

As an ethical fund manager, we invest in sustainable companies with good growth prospects that we believe will provide long-term benefits to society. Participating in capital raises is one way we achieve that goal.

 

Deana Mitchell is an equities analyst at Australian Ethical, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers from Australian Ethical, please click here.

 

  •   26 August 2020
  • 3
  •      
  •   
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.