Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 83

Animal spirits dormant except for coffee and food

The Reserve Bank Governor, Glenn Stevens, has drawn the line in the sand over the past six months, first by observing that entrepreneurial risk taking has been absent, then by imploring businesses to abandon their cost and capital discipline to embrace pro-growth strategies.

Analysts should therefore be looking for signs of a revival in the corporate sector's animal spirits as a guide to the date of lift-off in the Cash Rate. Regrettably, the recently released credit aggregates showed that business credit was flat in August and only 3% higher than a year earlier, confirming that the corporate sector remains reluctant to lift gearing against the backdrop of the new capital discipline.

The Governor's anxiety is understandable considering the imminent investment cliff in mining and energy over the next two years as the construction of LNG processing plants approach completion.

But does Mr Stevens seriously expect the non-mining sectors to ramp up their investment intentions at a time when they face persistent revenue headwinds? Unfortunately, the RBA continues to under-estimate the power of monetary policy to revive the corporate sector's animal spirits, to boost company revenues and lift expectations of growth in nominal GDP.

The ongoing weakness in consumer sentiment and the recently released August retail trade data suggest that the consumer's animal spirits also remain dormant. To put the retail trade survey in context, by excluding items such as services, petrol, motor vehicles and utilities, it accounts for less than one-third of total household sector spending.

Despite its narrowness, it represents an invaluable guide to consumer sentiment because it includes durable goods - such as PCs, washing machines etc - that households tend to buy when they are feeling optimistic and secure about their financial future.

I have further narrowed the survey to capture the three categories that listed discretionary retailers are most exposed to: household goods retailing; clothing, footwear & personal accessories; and department store sales. The chart below shows that discretionary spending across these three categories in aggregate has almost come to a standstill since the end of 2007 after growing at a strong compound annual rate of almost 7% in the preceding decade.

In contrast, the other components of the retail trade data - mainly spending on food as well as cafes & restaurants - has also slowed over the past seven years, but this has been more moderate. Clearly, discretionary retailers have been more exposed to revenue and competitive headwinds than consumer staples.

Persistently weak labour market conditions have not helped, with aggregate hours worked remaining stagnant for three years as companies continue to undertake restructuring and trim costs to offset anaemic revenue conditions.

Growth in all three components of discretionary spending have materially slowed since the financial crisis, but department store sales has remained the laggard (see chart below). In the past year, household goods retailing has lifted at a time when department store sales and spending on clothing, footwear & personal accessories has gone backwards.

The consumer's dormant animal spirits and intense retail competition (particularly from e-tailers) are reflected in the fact that sell-side analysts have not lifted their EPS projections for the discretionary retail sector for over four years now (see chart below). Indeed, the sector's forecast profitability is at the same level it was in 2005. This has been the lost decade for Australia's discretionary retailers. Valuations are not compelling at current levels, with the sector trading slightly above its historical median of 13 times twelve month forward earnings.

The consumer environment has deteriorated in recent years thanks to weak labour market conditions and increased job insecurity. This has been reflected in a decline in permanent incomes due to a lift in the discount rates that households apply to their future income stream. Little surprise that households have undertaken balance sheet repair and lifted their savings rate.

The revenue headwinds that have beset discretionary retailers are unlikely to change given intense competition from e-tailers and the RBA's timid approach to monetary policy. As with its attitude towards entrepreneurial risk taking, the RBA continues to under-estimate the ability for monetary policy to revive the consumer's animal spirits.

Discretionary retailers need to accept that a cautious consumer represents the new normal for now, and that trimming costs, lifting productivity and consolidating without undermining their service offering represents the most effective way to offer better returns to their long suffering shareholders.

 

Sam Ferraro is founder and principal of the independent financial consulting firm, Evidente.

 

  •   10 October 2014
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Global consumer and corporate resilience surprises everyone

After 30 years of investing, I prefer to skip this party

What will stop the market returning to its highs?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.