Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 31

Ben Graham’s three most enduring principles

Benjamin Graham was the father of security analysis and the intellectual Dean of Wall Street. I believe Graham was many things, including the father of the many ratios we take for granted in our work as analysts, portfolio managers and investment officers. Perhaps controversially, I also believe he may not have reached some of his conclusions had he access to a computer that allowed him to properly test his ideas.

Having said that, there are many things that Ben said that not only made sense but made significant contributions to investment thinking. And despite the absence of a computer, Graham observed several characteristics of the market that the advent of modern computing has only served to reinforce.

For those grateful for executive summaries, here follows mine on the three most significant contributions Ben Graham made to the body of work on investing.

By understanding, testing and implementing the approaches that flow from a study of Graham’s principles, I believe any investor will benefit not only in terms of returns but also in terms of risk mitigation. In Part 2 next week, we will display anecdotal evidence of their truth with graphics using modern computing and the techniques of the development team at Skaffold.com.

Lesson One

The first of Graham’s significant contributions is his Mr. Market allegory, introduced in 1949. Mr. Market is of course a fictitious character, created to demonstrate the bipolar nature of the market.

Here is an excerpt from a speech made by Warren Buffett about Ben Graham on the subject:

“You should imagine market quotations as coming from a remarkably accommodating fellow named Mr Market who is your partner in a private business. Without fail, Mr Market appears daily and names a price at which he will either buy your interest or sell you his.

Even though the business that the two of you own may have economic characteristics that are stable, Mr Market’s quotations will be anything but. For, sad to say, the poor fellow has incurable emotional problems. At times he feels euphoric and can see only the favorable factors affecting the business. When in that mood, he names a very high buy-sell price because he fears that you will snap up his interest and rob him of imminent gains…

Mr Market has another endearing characteristic: He doesn’t mind being ignored. If his quotation is uninteresting to you today, he will be back with a new one tomorrow.

Transactions are strictly at your option…But, like Cinderella at the ball, you must heed one warning or everything will turn into pumpkins and mice: Mr Market is there to serve you, not to guide you.

It is his pocketbook, not his wisdom that you will find useful. If he shows up some day in a particularly foolish mood, you are free to either ignore him or to take advantage of him, but it will be disastrous if you fall under his influence.”

The implications of this little story cannot be understated. What Graham is saying is that there is a legitimate alternative to the Efficient Market Theory as a model of the way the market behaves and works. He said this before EMT became the cornerstone of every financial services firm that cared about “biggering and biggering and BIGGERING.”

Another significant implication is that as investors we should be less focused on price as our guide as we should on value. This challenges the validity of many streams of financial study that have as their root, the price of securities. Think about all the PHD papers and other academic studies that uncover relationships, or validate the power of explanatory variables, but whose concluding evidences are merely price, or some derivative of price. If prices in the short run are determined by those who are merely selling to renovate the bathroom or by events in Syria – events that have no impact on the number of $2 buckets being sold by The Reject Shop – what ‘value’ can we place on them?

Lesson Two

The second great lesson Ben Graham taught gave us the three most important words in value investing; margin of safety. In engineering the margin of safety is the strength of the material minus the anticipated stress. Building materials that are far stronger than that required to survive the anticipated stress ensures a degree of comfort.

When it comes to investing, the margin of safety is the estimated value of a share minus the price.  The greater the margin of safety, the greater the degree of comfort and more importantly, the greater the expected return. If the price is what we pay, and the value what we receive, then the lower the price we pay, the higher the return.

Lesson Three

Despite the high profile of these enduring two lessons, I believe there is a third observation of Graham’s, which is equally important. Fascinatingly, with the benefit of computers, we can also demonstrate that Graham was spot on.

Graham was paraphrased by Buffett in 1993:

“In the short run the market is a voting machine - reflecting a voter-registration test that requires only money, not intelligence or emotional stability - but in the long run, the market is a weighing machine.”

What Graham described is something that, as both a private and professional investor, I have observed myself; in the short term, the market is a popularity contest – prices often diverge significantly from that which is justified by the economic performance of the business.  But in the long term, prices eventually converge with intrinsic values, which themselves follow business performance.

Next week, we will compare intrinsic value and share prices for some major Australian stocks to illustrate Ben Graham’s enduring principles.

 

Roger Montgomery is the founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund. 

 

  •   13 September 2013
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Testing Ben Graham’s voting and weighing machines

Are rising oil prices bad for Australian shares?

Weekly newsletter to subscribers features important investment insights

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.