Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 461

Is the speculative fever in 'hot stocks’ over?

Over two years from the Covid crisis in March and April 2020 to now, the market delivered price jumps in hundreds of tech stocks followed by a harsh reality check. The reasons for the surge in prices were simple: trillions of dollars sprayed around by governments, deficit spending their way to wartime-like debts, to boost incomes, save jobs, and encourage spending.

On top of this, central banks threw away their textbooks and set about to deliberately create inflation, cutting rates to zero (negative in Europe and Japan), and resorting to straight-out money-printing, to entice people to gear up to the hilt and spend. People everywhere threw their free or ultra-cheap money at just about anything, especially online retailing, tech, renewables, ‘crypto’ currencies, ‘NFTs’, and even boring old housing.

The days of reckoning

Here is a quick snapshot of the rise and fall (thus far) of the post-Covid tech fever. Below are price charts for a couple of dozen stocks since the start of 2020 – ie just prior to the February-March 2020 Covid sell-off. At the top we start with the broad US S&P 500 and NASDAQ indexes, then several US tech/online stocks, and some key stocks in other markets, including Australia. We also include some crypto’s, including the terraUSD ‘stable coin’.

We have used no charting trickery to make price moves appear greater than they actually are. On each chart, the left scale starts at zero at the bottom, so if a price looks like it has doubled, or trebled or risen ten-fold (like Tesla and Bitcoin), or has fallen by more than half (most of them), then they have.

This is not intended to be exhaustive. It is to illustrate that the patterns are virtually the same in each case, regardless of the circumstances or merits of each individual company (or crypto).

As almost none of them pay dividends, half make losses, and most of the rest make only tiny profits relative to their prices, the charts reflect the rise and fall of mass hysteria – first surging in, and then fleeing.

Will the hysteria return to drive prices higher?

Is this just a temporary dip that will recover, or will the mass-selling continue, or pause?

Sentiment changed in early 2022, and the reasons are also clear. It was the sudden realisation that the era of free and ultra-cheap money is over. Inflation surged well before Russia’s invasion, and central banks finally started to end QE money printing, and raise interest rates back toward more ‘normal’ levels. There is much debate about exactly where ‘normal’ is for cash rates in each country, but it is certainly much higher than where they are now.

The bell at the top of the market was probably the January 2022 Superbowl, dubbed the ‘crypto Superbowl’, which featured slick ads showing famous movie stars spruiking cryptos as a sure way to get rich. (This is fitting, as the bell at the top of the late 1990s ‘dot com’ boom was the January 2000 Superbowl, dubbed the ‘dot-com Superbowl’. It featured TV ads for 14 profit-less ‘dot-com’ start-ups that promptly crashed in the 2001-2002 ‘tech wreck’).

Will central banks suddenly switch back to rate cuts and QE? Not while inflation is running well above target, unless there is another major economic contraction (deep recession with high unemployment, like the in 2020). If that does occur, share markets would have already fallen and started to rebound by then. 

On the ‘fiscal’ (government spending and taxes) front, governments are still deficit spending, but the pace of spending increases has slowed significantly, and many programs have ended. Governments are under pressure to scale back spending, and are even talking of raising taxes (eg. tax hikes in Joe Biden’s election policy agenda).

Is pricing now more reasonable?

Has the recent sell-off brought prices back down to levels that are now ‘fair’ or reasonable (or perhaps even cheap?). Here are the price/earnings ratios and dividend yields for the broad market and for our tech/online stars:

On the left, we can see that price/earnings ratios are a not-too-expensive 21 for the US market as a whole. As a general rule of thumb, a P/E ratio above the high teens is getting expensive, and is only justifiable if the company can generate and sustain above-market profit growth well into the future. Here we see that the P/E ratios of the tech and online stars are well above that in almost all cases. Half of them make losses, so they don’t even have any ‘E’ (earnings) for us to calculate the P/E.

The current high pricing relies on assumptions of continued boom-time rates of profit growth, and many of these are going to be a lot more difficult to sustain as monetary and fiscal support is withdrawn, and as higher inflation and interest rates constrain spending, revenues, margins and profits.

The right chart highlights that there is almost a complete absence of cash dividends. This is important for the broader market, as the top half dozen stocks on the list are not just large tech/online stocks. They are the largest companies in the US market, and the largest in the entire world, so they drive global returns. (Australia’s Domino’s Pizza is seen as a hot tech stock for some bizarre reason, but it is by far the biggest dividend payer).

These numbers suggest profits need to remain strong (with inflation and interest rates not rising too high) or prices have further to fall.

 

Ashley Owen is Chief Investment Officer at advisory firm Stanford Brown and The Lunar Group. He is also a Director of Third Link Investment Managers, a fund that supports Australian charities. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   8 June 2022
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Bull and bear case for Australian equities for FY25

Why stock prices are a distraction

Gullible travels, or are Aussies more sceptical?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.