Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 573

Warren Buffett changes his mind at age 93

Warren Buffett is widely considered the greatest investor of all time so it’s no wonder that his every move is closely followed by markets. On August 3, Buffett made waves by revealing he’d sold 49% of his stake in Apple shares, worth US$88 billion, in the second quarter.  After a smaller sell-down of the stock in the first quarter, it means Buffett has reduced his stake in Apple by nearly 56% in 2024. While the second quarter sale of Apple shares wasn’t a total surprise, the extent of it certainly was.

Naturally, Buffett’s move has generated many questions from investors. About the future of Apple, about whether Buffett is calling a peak for technology stocks, and about whether he’s worried that the broader market is looking toppy. That the revelation happened during a dip in markets put investors further on edge.

Here, I’m going to explore the likely reasons for Buffett’s sale, why he’s changed his mind on Apple, and some of the key lessons for investors.

Details of the sale that shook markets

In its second quarter earnings release, Buffett’s conglomerate, Berkshire Hathaway, announced that it’d sold about 390 million Apples shares in the quarter, on top of the 115 million shares it offloaded from January to March. Berkshire said it still owned around 400 million shares, worth US$84 billion as of June 30.

Apple remains Berkshire’s largest stock holding. It’s close to 30% of the stock portfolio, more than double the second largest holding, Bank of America – which it’s also been selling. At its peak, Apple was more than 50% of the stock portfolio.

The sale means Buffett’s company is gushing with cash, totalling US$277 billion. Berkshire is holding 25% of its assets in cash, the highest percentage since 2004. The average cash position versus assets across its history is 14%.

Figure 1: Berkshire Hathaway’s Cash Pile (billions)

A large chunk of the cash is in Treasuries. The company held US$235 billion in short-term US Treasury Bills at the end of the second quarter, up 81% from the end of last year. Staggeringly, Berkshire now owns more Treasury Bills than the US Federal Reserve.

From effusive praise to selling

Buffett’s sale of Apple caught investors off-guard for two reasons:

  • Buffett has said he likes to buy stocks and hold them forever. The share sale runs counter to that.
  • Buffett has praised Apple on numerous occasions since owning a stake in the company.

On the first point, it’s intriguing that Buffett has previously named stocks he’d like to hold “indefinitely” – and Apple hasn’t been among them. Instead, he’s nominated Coca-Cola, American Express, and Occidental Petroleum as companies that he wants to own forever.

That said, Buffett has gone out of his way to talk up Apple since first purchasing the stock in 2016. After the initial purchase, he said he liked the stock and the company’s “sticky” product, although he didn’t use it.

In 2018, Buffett said Apple users are “very, very, very locked in, at least psychologically and mentally” to the product and the ecosystem.

“Apple has an extraordinary consumer franchise,” he said.

Last year, when asked how Berkshire can defend having Apple make up so much of its public portfolio, Buffett said, “It just happens to be a better business than any we own.” He also hailed CEO Tim Cook as one of the “best managers in the world.”

One of the reasons that Buffett has liked Cook’s management is that Apple has been consistent buyer of its own shares.

“When I buy Apple, I know that Apple is going to repurchase a lot of shares,” Buffett said in 2018.

And he’s noted how buybacks result in getting a bigger stake in the company without buying more shares.

“The math of repurchases grinds away slowly, but can be powerful over time,” Buffett said in 2021.

Buffett’s kind words for Apple even extended to May this year at Berkshire’s annual meeting. He declared that two of his long-time prized investments, Coca-Cola and American Express, were "wonderful" businesses, but lauded Apple as "an even better one."

At the same meeting, when asked why he’d sold some Apple stock during the first quarter, Buffett alluded to tax rates as a reason to take profits. He said selling now would benefit Berkshire shareholders should the U.S. raise capital gains taxes in the future “to plug a climbing fiscal deficit.”

Why has Buffett changed his mind?

The big question is: why is Buffett selling Apple now? The’s been much commentary about how the move indicates that Buffett is calling a market top. In effect, that markets are expensive and it’s time to bail.

Yet, this seems unlikely given Buffett has repeatedly said that he doesn’t believe in timing markets. He’s always focused on stocks, not markets.

Yet his reference to taxes as a reason to sell also doesn’t make sense. While it may have been a small part in the decision, it surely couldn’t have played a major role.  More likely, it was to give as an explanation, so he didn’t have to reveal the true reasons for the sale.

What were the real reasons, then? I think there are four probable factors behind the decision:

1. Apple is expensive

By any measure, Apple is priced for perfection. It trades at 32x earnings, compared to 10x when Buffett started buying it in 2016. The price to sales ratio has also moved from 2x to 9x – the highest in the company’s history.

Figure 2: Apple Inc. Price to Earnings and Price to Sales Ratios

Buffett remains a value investor and a believer in purchasing stocks at a price that offers a “margin of safety”. Perhaps, Apple no longer offers that margin of safety.

And perhaps, Buffett has learned his lesson from not selling another of his beloved shares, Coca-Cola, in 1998. Back then, Coke’s stock reached more than 50x earnings and 11x sales as the market exploded higher.  As markets came back to earth, the shares didn’t reach their 1998 highs again until 16 years later.

Buffett has since said that he regrets not selling Coca-Cola in 1998.

“Coca Cola is a fabulous company that was selling at a silly price… You can definitely fault me for not selling the stock. I always thought it was a wonderful business, but clearly at 50 times earnings it was a silly price.” - Buffett, 2006 annual meeting

2. No growth

While valuations may have been one reason for Buffett’s selling, a deterioration in Apple’s earnings power may have been another. Between 2010 and 2020, Apple revenue grew at a 15.5% average annual rate. During the pandemic, Apple enjoyed a surge in revenue — growing at a nearly 20% annual rate in 2021 and 2022. However, between 2022 and March 2024, Apple’s revenue declined almost every quarter. Apple’s revenue broke that run by rising 5% in the June-2024 ending quarter – still anemic by most measures. Unless AI can kickstart growth, Apple pricey stock doesn’t make a lot of sense.

3. Lost faith in management

One reason for Buffett selling that I haven’t seen in any commentary is that he may have lost faith in Apple’s CEO. Buffett has said that he looks closely at leaders and how they allocate capital. Previously, he’s lambasted CEOs who’ve bought back company stock when the shares were expensive.

While Buffett has applauded Apple’s large buybacks in the past, he’s probably less happy with continued buybacks now. Why? Because buying back shares when the company was cheap made sense. With the company now expensive, it makes much less sense.

4. Money is safer in Treasuries

It’s clear that Buffett assesses the value of stocks against other asset classes. By buying a gargantuan amount of Treasury Bills yielding more than 5%, he clearly believes that these Bills offer the prospect of a better risk-adjusted return than Apple stock.

Where it leaves Berkshire Hathaway

Intrigue has already started into what Buffett will eventually do with his US$277 billion cash pile. The below chart puts it into context.

Figure 3: Warren Buffet’s $277 billion Cash Pile

Buffett has said for many years that he’s seeking an “elephant” of a deal to put Berkshire’s cash to work. That need is greater after the Apple sale.

Taking over a whole company is an obvious prospect. Taking minority positions in stocks is becoming much harder.

Buffett has warned Berkshire shareholders that the size of the company will limit outperformance going forward. Firstlinks contributor, Ashley Owen, wrote a fabulous article last year on how Buffett lost his edge 20 years ago for the following reasons:

  • Berkshire has become too large, and it can’t deploy the huge sums effectively without moving markets.
  • It has too much cash, which is largely the result of the first problem.

Ashley has a point.

Buybacks are an option for Buffett, though at these prices, it’s less attractive.

As for the possibility of dividends, it seems doubtful. Buffett probably believes keeping the money in Treasury Bills inside the company is better than giving it to shareholders who may turn around, after the government has taxed their dividends, and invest it in Treasuries anyway, or worse, in an overvalued share market.

Takeaways for investors

Here are the five lessons that I think investors can take away from Buffett’s sale of Apple shares:

  1. It’s ok to change your mind. Think about how hard it must have been for Buffett to lavishly praise a stock and then later start selling it. Most people when taking a strong stand initially would dig in and find reasons to keep the stock, even if valuations got out of hand. To his credit, Buffett didn’t.
  2. Price matters, always. In a market like today’s, there are plenty of people who are “buy quality stocks no matter what the price” type investors. Buffett has stayed true to his value investing roots. For him, price always matters.
  3. Focus on stocks, not the market. Buffett doesn’t get caught up in the noise of markets. He focuses on stocks and their fundamentals, and that’s it.
  4. Weigh stocks against values of other asset classes. The return versus risk of stocks should always be assessed against other assets. Buffett thinks Treasuries offering 5% yield are better value than Apple stock.
  5. Be patient. Buffett has been sitting on a lot of cash for a while now, and he’s endlessly patient, waiting for the right investment opportunity.

 

James Gruber is the Editor of Firstlinks.

 

20 Comments
Paul Croucher
August 19, 2024

Let’s see if he “dumps” any more next quarter, if not then he clearly hasn’t changed his mind on Apple

Harry
August 19, 2024

Exactly, rebalancing to reduce from 55% to 30% is simply reducing exposure to risk. At 30%, he’s still deeply in love!

John McCormack
August 16, 2024

Maybe he's just cashing it all out, slowly but surely selling the lot to ensure there is only cash which can be used by his family for charitable purposes

James Gruber
August 16, 2024

Hi John,

Buffett wants Berkshire to continue for a long time after he passes and has given no indication of doing what you say.

Also, the cash raised from an Apple sale belongs to the company, of which he's one shareholder - it's not him cashing out.

Best,
James

Andrew Pepper
August 16, 2024

Maybe he thinks Harris will get elected and we will get a 36 or higher gains tax. Canada hsd a big increase lately.

Steve
August 16, 2024

Maybe Charlie Mungers passing has something to do with the change of heart? Losing your wingman must have some impact. Maybe Charlie was more pro-Apple than Warren?

James Gruber
August 16, 2024

Steve,

Perhaps - it's food for thought.

John Newsome
August 16, 2024

Reason 1 the old fox talking prices up while dumping stock , is there not a law against that sort of behaviour or is he beyond reproach

B
August 16, 2024

You nailed it, John.
Not the first time he's doing it either - just think of the IBM holdings Buffett dumped while he was praising their management. Someone called him a shill for IBM management if I remember correctly - great way to minimise the losses from one of his biggest investment mistakes ever.

James Gruber
August 16, 2024

Hi John,

A somewhat cynical take, of which I have some sympathy.

There isn't a law against it but there should be. Elon making continual promises and pipedreams to pump up his stock is the more egregious one in recent times.

Best,
James

SGN
August 16, 2024

Reason #6 - let the Investors Guess Why , But eventually follow his action and come out second best.

Patrick Kissane
August 16, 2024

"And he’s noted how buybacks result in getting a bigger stake in the company without buying more shares.
The math of repurchases grinds away slowly, but can be powerful over time,” Buffett said in 2021."

Mr Buffett does not appear to have done his math very well.
Assume that a company has issued 1ssued 1000 shares and they are collectively worth $10,000 i.e. $10 each. Bill owns 100 of the shares and they are collectively worth $1,000 i.e. 100 x $10. Next, the company buys back 100 of its shares on the market for $1,000. The company now has on issue 900 shares at a value of $9,000. Bill now owns 100/900 of $9,000 = $1,000. Bill's share value has not changed at all! The reason is that he now owns a larger share of a smaller pot. The company's issued no. of shares has gone down but so has its assets. It has paid out $1,000 of its assets in buying back the shares. Consequently, its total assets are now $9,000 i.e $10,000 less $1,000.

Derek
August 16, 2024

Not correct. Companies buy back shares out of cashflow, not assets. The fundamentals of the company remain the same, IE. the ability to generate a return. But this return is now spread across fewer shareholders. Their holding then becomes more valuable. The maths work in the long run.

Ryan
August 16, 2024

Your example makes sense from a book value standpoint but not from earnings. Assuming earnings remains the same the earning per share will increase because there are less shares available. For example if the company made 1000 dollars before the share repurchase assuming 1000 shares outstanding would be 1 dollar per share. After the buyback there would be 1000/900 = 1.11 dollars per share which would increase the earnings per share and accordingly, the value per share would increase.

James Gruber
August 16, 2024

Ok, the comments here seem to suggest that buybacks are always a good thing. That's not the case.

If a company buys back its stock at expensive valuations and the stock subsequently goes down a lot, that's a poor allocation of capital that would have been better used elsewhere.

My point in the article is that Buffett saw Apple's buybacks in years past as a great way to use excess cash because the stock was cheap.

Apple is much more expensive now with minimal growth and it's still using free cashflow to buy back shares. I can't see how Buffett would see this as responsible allocation of cash.

Best,
James

Neil
August 15, 2024

Reason #5 - having 50% of your investment portfolio in one stock is very risky.

James Gruber
August 16, 2024

Hi Neil,

Buffett has never viewed it that way. He's always favoured a concentrated portfolio and hasn't changed now.

Kind regards,
James

Kevin
August 19, 2024

Hiya James.I have a very concentrated portfolio,I'd be in jail for crimes against the smart money if there were laws against it.

Imagine if you'd only bought the 4 companies ( are there more?) that the govt sold off. CBA @$5.40. CSL @ ~ $2.50,now 3 shares @~ $300 each. Telstra ,$2.50? and Qantas $2 each?. 2 out of 4 ain't bad,retire as a multi millionaire by buying 1,000 in each of them just by re investing dividends.

Companies here tend to buy a lot of shares back on market,well the ones that I own.A few billion $$ here and there to stop the number of shares increasing through DRPs. and capital raisings etc..Wesfarmers keep a very tight leash on shares on issue.I think the last 5 years of history in the annual report says they have around 1,000 more shares on issue than 5 years ago.

Mac bank with all the capital raisings etc have around 50 million more shares on issue than 10 years ago. 50 million on 380 million?

Raining,I'm bored until I can get out,shortly hopefully.

Kevin
August 19, 2024

When CBA released their results last week I vaguely heard,or read , that that initial purchase of 400 shares in CBA was now worth around $350K.

So that 400 shares @$2160 has grown to around 2600 shares to get the approx $350K.Using the DRP.

I didn't get CSL on IPO,and spent a lot of years waiting for the price to come down.When it did come down I was distracted elsewhere,and thinking,it might get lower.

Eventually the Nike plan comes to the fore,just do it.Happy with the result.Happy with the plunge down to $240 or so and the capital raising for Vifor? The Swiss company that may or may not be a good buy.

Irene
August 19, 2024

I agreed with you.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Three key takeaways from Buffett's annual letter

Buffett on markets, cash and seizing opportunities

Why it's a frothy market but not a bubble

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

Avoiding wealth transfer pitfalls

Australia is in the early throes of an intergenerational wealth transfer worth an estimated $3.5 trillion. Here's a case study highlighting some of the challenges with transferring wealth between generations.

Taxpayers betrayed by Future Fund debacle

The Future Fund's original purpose was to meet the unfunded liabilities of Commonwealth defined benefit schemes. These liabilities have ballooned to an estimated $290 billion and taxpayers continue to be treated like fools.

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

Looking beyond banks for dividend income

The Big Four banks have had an extraordinary run and it’s left income investors with a conundrum: to stick with them even though they now offer relatively low dividend yields and limited growth prospects or to look elsewhere.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

Investment strategies

Time to announce the X-factor for 2024

What is the X-factor - the largely unexpected influence that wasn’t thought about when the year began but came from left field to have powerful effects on investment returns - for 2024? It's time to select the winner.

Shares

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

It’s halfway through the 2020s decade and time to get a scorecheck on the Australian stock market. The picture isn't pretty as Aussie shares are having a below-average decade so far, though history shows that all is not lost.

Shares

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Four years ago, we introduced our 'bubbles' chart to show how the market had become concentrated in one type of stock and one view of the future. This looks at what, if anything, has changed, and what it means for investors.

Shares

Is Medibank Private a bargain?

Regulatory tensions have weighed on Medibank's share price though it's unlikely that the government will step in and prop up private hospitals. This creates an opportunity to invest in Australia’s largest health insurer.

Shares

Negative correlations, positive allocations

A nascent theme today is that the inverse correlation between bonds and stocks has returned as inflation and economic growth moderate. This broadens the potential for risk-adjusted returns in multi-asset portfolios.

Retirement

The secret to a good retirement

An Australian anthropologist studying Japanese seniors has come to a counter-intuitive conclusion to what makes for a great retirement: she suggests the seeds may be found in how we approach our working years.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.