Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 572

Why life expectancy numbers are widely misunderstood

The Encyclopaedia Britannica website explains that life expectancy is “an estimate of the average number of additional years that a person of a given age can expect to live.” The key word here is average, and there are different ways of calculating it.

How is life expectancy calculated?

There are two main calculation methods used: Period Life Expectancy and Cohort Life Expectancy. While these may sound technical, it’s important for everyone working in financial planning, superannuation, the media, etc, to know the difference.

1. Period life expectancy

Period Life Expectancy is the simpler method, and it’s the one typically quoted in the media and in legislation—however, it is highly misleading. Part of the reason it’s so commonly used is it’s easier to look up, and the life expectancies don’t change until the next Life Tables are produced.

Period Life Expectancy figures are just one part of the latest Australian Life Tables published by the Australian Government Actuary (AGA) every five years. The most recent life tables are based on the three calendar years centred on the 2016 census (the ‘period’).

The AGA looks at the total number of deaths in those three years, by age, as a percentage of the number of people who were alive at each age. This data informs a set of ‘mortality rates’ for the Australian population, which are the basis for life expectancy calculations.

Mortality rates give us the probability that a male or a female of any age passes away in the year before their next birthday. The probability an average 30-year-old passes away within a year is under 0.1%. But for older people, the probabilities increase markedly. The probability an average 90-year-old man dies within a year is around 15%.

By looking at the mortality rate at each and every future age of a person’s life, we’re able to calculate the probability they will survive to each future age. For a 60-year-old, we calculate the probability they will survive to age 61, then to age 62, then to age 63, and so on, all the way up to the end of the Australian Life Tables (age 109). This lets us calculate the average age they’ll live to based on all these probabilities.

Using the latest Australian Life Tables, a 60-year-old male’s Period Life Expectancy is 84.0; for a 60-year-old female, it is 86.9.

It is called their Period Life Expectancy because the mortality rates are based on a specific period, in this case, the calendar years 2015 to 2017.

2. Cohort life expectancy

In reality, because of ongoing medical developments and trends toward healthier lifestyles (e.g., a reduction in smoking), mortality rates have been decreasing steadily over the past decades, particularly since the 1970s. This means that life expectancy calculations based only on mortality rates from a specific period are simply wrong for most practical purposes.

Actuaries don’t ‘expect’ that the number of years a person will live in practice is their Period Life Expectancy. We’ve got to allow for these improvement trends. This is where Cohort Life Expectancy comes in.

Cohort Life Expectancy allows for the fact that mortality rates change during the lifespan of a group of people, or cohort, as they get older. Improvements in medical treatments and healthier lifestyles result in a reduction in their mortality rates from one period to the next.

Each time the Australian Life Tables are updated, the AGA carefully analyses how the mortality rate at each age has been changing by looking at data for up to the last 125 years. More recently, each set of Australian Life Tables comes with accompanying estimates of how mortality rates may change (improve) in the future. These assumptions are called improvement rate assumptions.

Cohort Life Expectancy calculations use this extra information. It means a significant improvement in accuracy. Instead of looking up mortality rates from, say, 2015, which effectively assumes each person spends their entire life in 2015, we acknowledge that people reach each birthday in a different future calendar year when mortality rates will have changed (reduced) relative to when the tables were produced.

Chart 1 shows an example of how mortality rates change. It shows the estimated mortality rate at age 75 years over time. For a 65-year-old in 2024, by the time they reach age 75 (in 2034), the mortality rate for 75-year-old males would be nearly 40% less than when the tables were based 18 years ago.

Chart 1: Reducing mortality rate for a 75-year-old male

In Chart 2 below, each column shows the Period Life Expectancy for a 65-year-old male using the mortality rates from historic life tables (noting that today’s 65-year-olds were born in 1959).

The blue bars show strong, steady upward improvement. The red line shows their Cohort Life Expectancies, which are higher because the people’s assumed mortality rates will continue to reduce in the future.

Chart 2: Period and Cohort Life expectancy of a 65-year-old male

Using the latest Australian Life Tables with the 25-year improvement rate assumptions, the Cohort Life Expectancy of a 60-year-old male is 87.9—about four years more than his Period Life Expectancy. For a 60-year-old female, it’s 89.8—about three years more than her Period Life Expectancy.

Estimates are only that, however. Actual rates of improvement can vary from the estimates. Variation can occur if positive future medical advances are different to the estimates or if negative changes occur, such as increases in obesity, drug deaths, pandemics, etc.

At the end of this article, we show that the impact of COVID-19 on population mortality rates was less than many people might expect. The Australian Bureau of Statistics reports that total deaths in 2020 and 2021 were fewer than they anticipated prior to COVID-19, and that this is because public health measures also caused a reduction in deaths from several other causes. Since then, the total number of deaths increased but fell again in 2023. We therefore await the next Australian Life Tables at the end of the year. What is more important for longevity isn’t the mortality experience during a few years but over the long term.

Concluding comments or pearls of wisdom

Life expectancy is not a prediction of how long any individual will live—it’s just an average for a group or cohort at each age. None of us are average. We are all different, with different lifestyles, different genes, different attitudes to risk, and so on. This means the average is only relevant to a very small percentage of people.

Cohort Life Expectancies are a more realistic representation of the average number of years an individual or a group of people will live. However, as you can see, they are more complex to calculate and not as easy to simply look up in a table—as they depend on the year that you are doing the calculations.

No one should rely on Period Life Expectancy figures in practice, despite being easier to look up. They are only based on mortality rates that applied during a certain historic period. We know there are strong trends for these mortality rates to reduce in future years, resulting in higher life expectancies.

Don’t forget: Life expectancy calculations are based on the range of lifespans that can transpire for the individuals within a group. They are not a prediction. There is a large standard deviation around average life expectancy figures. For new retirees, the standard deviation is roughly eight years.

For financial planning, it’s vital to recognise that some people will have short lifespans, and others will have very long lifespans. What happens to each individual is subject to randomness. A more appropriate rule of thumb might be to focus on the age when most people in a group will have passed away.

 

David Orford is the Founder and Managing Director of, and Jim Hennington is Head of Innovation at Optimum Pensions. Optimum Pensions was launched in late 2017 with the objective of providing innovative sustainable retirement income solutions. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

4 Comments
Mark
August 11, 2024

My mum and dad had 9 years in age between them. Dad passed at 79, mum passed away 9 years later also at 79. I'm basing my life expectancy and financial modelling on that plus an extra 6 years buffer. No need for complex modelling. (I'm currently 57)

Jim Hennington
August 13, 2024

A 57 year old male of average health has nearly 70% chance they'll live beyond 85*.

Check out https://optimumpensions.com.au/lifespan-calculator/ which lets you personalise these type calcs. It uses Cohort Mortality rates and gives an option to personalise the calcs further.

* ALT 2015-17 with 25-year improvement rates.

David Orford
August 13, 2024

Thanks Mark. I bet you're dying to hear that the correlation between parents and their children's ages at deaths (allowing for improvements over the period of the age difference) is less than 50% (I cannot remember the exact percentages). It is scarier than you might think. Part of the reason is that we discover cures for certain life-threatening illnesses and there are buses running around the streets looking for people to be "run over by a bus"" i.e. there are new ways to die that didn't affect our parents. My mother and her father died of heart attacks at age 72 BUT I've had a heart by-pass operation (when I needed a brain transplant). My surgeon said it gave me an extra 20 years of life. Some people say I'm already dead (from the neck up) but I disagree. Just like you insure everything you can, you could insure your longevity or lifestyle in retirement by buying a lifetime annuity. Research shows that the average annuitant is happier and spends twice as much as a non-annuitant.

David Williams
August 08, 2024

A really useful reminder of the inherent difficulty of even getting a useful average number for an age cohort, let alone an individual. However, we can take comfort from the enormous amount of good research into the many factors that can affect a person's own outcome. This has enabled development of a useful algorithm that provides a personal outcome and stages, reasons for it and potential actions. So each person can systematically influence their own longevity - the rest of their life.
Of course, random events can affect the outcome - but the core strategy is much more strongly focused. This underpins an ability to plan and is the basis of longevity planning. With this in place, each person (and their partner) can much more confidently frame their health, financial and estate planning decisions and seek to adapt them if their circumstances change - for good or bad.
All advice is improved by prior longevity planning. There are no compliance constraints and product inhibitions, and its simple time language has no 'literacy' problems, enhancing communications and relationships. Truly the way ahead!

 

Leave a Comment:


RELATED ARTICLES

How not to run out of money in retirement

Should I pay off the mortgage or top up my superannuation?

The future of retirement is already here

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

An important Foxtel announcement...

News Corp's plans to sell Foxtel are surprising in that streaming assets Kayo, Binge and Hubbl look likely to go with it. This and recent events in the US show the bind that legacy TV businesses find themselves in.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 575 with weekend update

A new study has found Australians far outlive people in other English-speaking countries. We live four years longer than the average American and two years more than the average Briton, and some of the reasons why may surprise you.

  • 29 August 2024

The challenges of building a portfolio from scratch

It surprises me how often individual investors and even seasoned financial professionals don’t know the basics of building an investment portfolio. Here is a guide to do just that, as well as the challenges involved.

Creating a bulletproof investment portfolio

Is it possible to build a portfolio that performs well in any economic environment? So-called 'All Weather' portfolios have become more prominent of late, and this looks at what these portfolios are and their pros and cons.

Why I'm a perma-bull on stocks

Investors overestimate the risk of owning stocks and underestimate the risk of not owning them. In the long run, shares crush other major asset classes, yet it’s one thing to understand this, it’s another to being able to execute on it.

What happens to your super when you die?

Nominating beneficiaries with your super fund is the only way to direct your death benefits to the people you want to receive it. The steps you take will depend on your circumstances and who your intended beneficiaries are.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Which asset classes are a bargain now?

Many assets have enjoyed a positive year, leaving some of them looking pricey. Here we compare valuations of cash, bonds, stocks, and property, and suggest where investors may be able to find opportunities.

Latest from Morningstar

Dividend ETFs may disappoint income investors

The structure of many dividend ETFs leads to lacklustre or non-existent dividend growth. Balancing high yields with long-term dividend growth is essential for effective income investing. 

Shares

Rosy markets ignore darker dividend outlook for ASX

Investors are determined to cling to the idea of a goldilocks scenario for the Australian economy. Meanwhile, company updates paint a picture worse than any we’ve seen post-COVID.

Property

Why tapping super for housing is a bad idea

The Coalition is continuing to push for superannuation to be used for housing deposits. It's a bad idea on several fronts, including that it would inevitably push up already expensive housing prices.

Economy

Immigration: Social costs vs. economic benefits

Immigration offers economic benefits, such as tax revenue, increased productivity, and reduced crime, but also challenges, including social cohesion. This looks at how Canada and Germany are balancing these complexities.

Investment strategies

Avoiding destructive M&A and hype cycles in mining

In a recent webinar, Schroders' Head of Research in Australian equities discussed BHP’s expensive bid for Anglo and a recent commodity collapse that was typical in its nature yet unprecedented in size.

An intriguing theory explaining persistent LIC discounts

The rise of trading discounts in closed-ended funds has challenged investors. This latest research suggests that funds that exhibit high volatility or beta tend to trade at larger discounts to their net tangible asset values. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.