Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 382

Why tech companies trade at a premium

Compared to the US, where technology stocks are now the largest sector of the S&P500 at 27% of the index, Australia has a small tech component. Despite this, Australian businesses also face significant tech disruption, often by companies not traditionally associated with ‘tech’, such as Steadfast (ASX:SDF), James Hardie (ASX:JHX), CSL (ASX:CSL), Resmed (ASX:RMD) and REA Group (ASX:REA).

Many companies are using tech to disrupt competitors, and with intellectual property investment only 2% of Australia’s GDP compared to 5% in the US, as shown in Figure 1, tech disruption has barely started on a long journey.

Figure 1: IP investment remains much lower in Australia than in the United States

An innovative way to measure tech disruption

Equity analysts at UBS Securities in Australia embarked on innovative research to measure tech disruption. They were asked to rate which stocks are most effective in using data and technology relative to peers in their sector. They also checked which stocks use tech phrases in their stock exchange updates, including references to artificial intelligence, machine learning, natural language, deep learning and predictive analysis. UBS reports:

"Appen, Telstra, Insurance Australia Group, PRO Medicus, Seek, ASX, Flight Centre, QBE Insurance and Xero mentioned these phrases at least 100 times over the past five years."

Overall, they found that stocks identified as tech focused had Price/Earnings ratios (P/Es) that were significantly higher than their peers. UBS then back-tested to show that stocks with high tech disruption scores outperformed stocks with low disruption scores by an annualised 14% since the start of 2016.

Table 1 shows the identified companies and their tech disruption and tech mention scores. 

Table 1: Key growth names

Tech stocks which UBS likes include Appen, NextDC, Nanosonics, and REA. Non-tech stocks with a high-tech disruption score or lagging share prices include Aristocrat Leisure, CSL, ResMed, James Hardie, Breville and Steadfast Group. UBS thinks Altium and Magellan are worth watching, all listed above.

Tech disruption explains Growth outperforming Value

UBS also finds that tech disruption is contributing to the ongoing outperformance of Growth over Value stocks, which is a major issue for fund managers who have built their businesses on identifying 'Value' (or companies trading at below their fundamental values). The increase in the valuation gap between high and low PE stocks has, in part, been justified by high PE stocks producing significantly higher earnings growth than their low PE counterparts, as shown in Figure 2. Tech companies are usually Growth stocks.

Figure 2: Earnings of ASX200 growth stocks versus value stocks since 2007

Since the start of 2007, earnings of growth firms have nearly doubled, while earnings of value stocks have halved. The high growth firms justify higher multiples due to their higher earnings growth. The earnings of tech disrupters have also consistently grown faster than tech laggards since 2016 (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Tech disrupters EPS relative to tech laggards

Tech disruptors are Growth stocks and benefit from lower rates

UBS has also written notes on how ultra-low rates are having a major impact on the prices of Australian equities:

"An additional insight from those notes is that a lower risk-free rate means that long-dated future cash flows matter more than near-term cash flows in a discounted cash-flow framework. Put differently, the terminal value component accounts for a greater proportion of the value of the equity. Growth stocks are longer duration assets (more cash flows in the future). Value stocks are shorter duration assets (less cash flows in the future).

Tech disruptors are Growth stocks and therefore benefit from lower rates due to their duration. Lower rates also mean that tech disruptors are able to finance technology at lower cost and take a longer-term view on tech-related projects. Lower overall market EPS growth is also positive for tech disruptors and other Growth stocks due to the scarcity premium that they command."

Figure 4 highlights the decade of Growth outperforming Value.

Figure 4: Growth outperforming Value since the GFC

 

In a note of optimism that investing is not only a tech story, UBS also notes:

"High quality industrials that are able to maintain solid earnings growth in a low interest rate environment are likely to outperform." 

The market is also seeing larger stock-specific price reactions to news events, as so much of the price is determined by long-term expectations. Either a threat to or affirmation of this future potential sends investors to buy and sell and the market catches the momentum. The potential for long-term durable competitive advantages is especially valued.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks. This article draws on the work of Pieter Stoltz, Jim Xu and Paul Winter, Equity Analysts at UBS Securities. This article contains general information only and does not constitute personal financial product advice. It does not consider any investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs.

More articles and papers from UBS, a sponsor of Firstlinks, can be found here.

 

  •   4 November 2020
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Why August company reporting season was poor

How we have invested during COVID-19

Stocks near their 52-week lows: is it time to reconsider?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.