Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 332

Young women are investing more in shares

While share ownership in Australia (and around the world) is dominated by men, there are encouraging signs that the wealth gap may close over time, as younger women start investing to build wealth. In a recent analysis by nabtrade, Gen Z women (the generation born between 1995 and 2015, following the Millennials) hold 20% larger portfolios than men of the same age.

Women's wealth traditionally held back

Demographic headwinds such as time out of the workforce to have children and lower average salaries have generally prevented women from accruing wealth at the same rate as men, resulting in a substantial wealth gap between the sexes in older generations.

In younger people, however, women are building portfolios through a combination of careful stock selection in large companies and much lower turnover rates than their male peers. This results in larger portfolios and lower transaction costs. In contrast, young men are more likely to hold stocks outside the S&P/ASX200 and to trade more frequently.

While women typically trade far less frequently than men across all age groups, they also trade in larger parcel sizes relative to their overall portfolio holdings. This aligns with global research since the 1990s, which suggests that men may be prone to overconfidence in their trading. Research shows men actively turn over their portfolios, which may reduce returns through excess transaction costs and imperfect market timing, while women place fewer trades and show greater commitment to their long-term investment strategies.

Stock selection

Individual shareholdings also differed between the genders across the generations, with women favouring staples such as Coles and Woolworths, as well as retailers including Harvey Norman. Women were also more likely to hold Bubs Australia and A2 Milk than their male counterparts.

nabtrade data showed women tend to stay with stocks and sectors that are familiar to them, meaning they are more likely to hold bank shares and less likely to invest in direct international shares than men across all age groups. While female investors showed a strong preference for ethical ETFs and were also much less likely to hold gambling and energy stocks than men, they were equally likely to hold one of the big miners.

Stock/Sector/Instrument Type

More likely to hold

Coles and Woolworths

Women

Retail sector

Women

Big Miners

Equal

Big Energy

Men

Gambling

Men

A2 Milk, Bubs Australia

Women

Domestic ETF

Women

International ETF

Men

Ethical ETF

Women

Differences between generations

While Gen Z women hold larger portfolios than their male counterparts, and Gen Y portfolios are of similar size between the sexes, female Baby Boomers hold just 56% of the portfolio size of men in the same age group. Gen X women hold portfolios nearly 78% the size of a man’s in the same age group.

These statistics paint a particularly dark picture of women’s economic wellbeing when couples commonly (and logically) choose to invest in the name of the lower-income earning spouse, typically the woman. Once accounting for this bias, the value of women’s overall holdings is further reduced.

The rise of online share trading and the proliferation of low-cost products such as ETFs has allowed young people of both genders to come to the share market at a younger age than previous generations, giving them a head start in wealth creation. As these investors grow in confidence and experience, it is hoped they will continue to invest for their future.

 

nabtrade is donating all brokerage on 27 November 2019 to help drought-affected farmers – find out more.

 

Gemma Dale is Director of SMSF and Investor Behaviour at nabtrade, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This material has been prepared as general information only, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more nabtrade insights or to open an account, visit the website. You can also access Gemma’s weekly Your Wealth podcast on nabtrade, or via Apple podcasts, Spotify or Podbean.

For more articles and papers from nabtrade, please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

How do women really invest?

Five lessons from the 'Witch' of Wall Street

Why women are most hurt by financial pandemic

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.