Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 491

The bull case for nuclear energy, oil and cheap China plays

The biggest crisis facing the world economy is a lack of cheap energy to drive economic prosperity and growth. Three quarters of the world’s energy comes from fossil fuels, but underinvestment in exploration over the past decade has resulted in the world consuming three times more oil than was discovered.

The west is now highly dependent on OPEC and Russia for its oil supplies making it exceptionally vulnerable. Spare capacity is minimal, and the US and Europe have drained their emergency reserves to hold oil prices down, lulling people into a false sense of security. China’s lockdowns have tempered oil demand but recent moves to reopen will add further pressure to the global oil market.

The great energy transition to wind and solar power has so far had very little impact on demand for fossil fuels. What is scary is that governments continue to endorse the renewables transition despite having no clear plan as to how their intermittency will be addressed. Enormous batteries are still way too costly, so expensive back-up generation is required, resulting in rising energy costs for consumers.

The CEO of Origin Energy recently called for “honesty” with the Australian public about the increase in electricity bills required to finance the “truly staggering” investment necessary to meet Australia’s 2030 emissions target.

What can be done?

From what we can see, the only realistic way to provide clean, affordable, and reliable energy to the world’s growing population is to go nuclear. Europe is finally waking up to this with the UK, France, Poland, Netherlands, and Belgium restarting their nuclear programs.

Companies such as Rolls Royce are developing new cost-effective small modular nuclear reactors that can be built in factories and transported on trucks whilst incorporating fourth generation safety features.

Rolls Royce - Modular Reactor Design

However, building nuclear generation will take a long time. In the meantime, we have a growing world population that aspires to improved standards of living. Oil, gas, and coal will therefore be with us for some time to come.

Easy money and inflation

The energy crisis is reinforcing the inflation nightmare the world faces. As we all know the inflation genie is out of the bottle and interest rates are rising faster than at any time in recent history. Central bankers were slow to react in 2021 deeming inflation ‘transitory’ and face an uphill battle to regain credibility. They are now marching in lockstep to rein in the inflationary beast.

In the wake of COVID, the lowest interest rates in history fostered a speculative boom bigger than any other, with people betting on nearly anything that walks or crawls.

The crypto craze was symptomatic of the boom, with investors buying ‘assets’ that pay no interest or dividend, are far from secure, chew up valuable energy and have endless competitors as promoters conjure up new coins and sell them to the unsuspecting public.

Similarly, profitless tech stocks have been punished. The destruction is highlighted by the 80% collapse in the share price of the high-profile ARK Innovation Fund. ARK soared in 2020 and 2021 as risky technology stocks took off, the majority of which have now sunk.

These are the canaries in the coal mine. Throughout history, reckless risk taking has always led to disaster.

Governments seem ill-equipped for challenges

Governments and central banks seem ill equipped to handle the plethora of economic problems the world faces.

Modern monetary theory which professed that printing money, known as quantitative easing, could solve our problems has now been completely discredited. Markets are ultimately bigger than any government, proven by George Soros breaking the British pound. More recently, Liz Truss met her Waterloo when her proposal to cut taxes and run huge deficits led to soaring interest rates and the pound collapsing once again.

Philip Lowe, the Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, is one of the world’s first central bankers to admit to all the problems. Dr Lowe recently warned that de-globalisation, fewer working-age people, rising barriers to trade and the revival of the trade union movement will affect both living standards and price levels. Additionally, he highlighted that the renewable energy transition was leading to insufficient investment in traditional energy sources, resulting in “higher and more volatile energy prices”.

The boom in asset prices over the past decade will be hard to repeat considering the headwinds economies and markets confront.

Governments will be keen to tax anything that moves. The British and German governments have already started upping taxes on oil, gas and renewable producers and the Australian Federal and Queensland governments are following suit.

With budget deficits worsening, tax departments have their sights set on multinationals, but there will be pressure for taxes to rise across the board. As we commented earlier the outlook is inflationary, however this could swing deflationary at the drop of a hat if further interest rate hikes cause a crash in stocks, bonds, and property, similar to what happened in 1987.

How our fund is positioned

Given the precarious state of the world economy and unstable asset markets, we are maintaining 12% of the Trust in gold and 39% in Treasury Bills that now yield 4.5%.

We currently have 19% of the fund in non-Russian energy related stocks that are earning huge profits and paying big dividends. We have another 7% in Russian oil and gas stocks that are also making large profits, but foreigners remain unable to trade and hence they are valued at a 48% discount to Moscow Exchange prices. All our energy companies have huge reserves and bright futures in an energy constrained world.

Our biggest holding is China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC), which is one of the world’s preeminent oil producers, and is among industry leaders in production growth, profit margins and returns on capital. CNOOC is also incredibly cheap, capitalised at $60 billion, it will produce 500 million barrels of oil this year, generating a profit of around $20 billion.

Further to this, CNOOC owns 25% of the world class Starbroek block in Guyana, with Exxon and Hess. The Starbroek field has a resource of 12 billion barrels of oil, with analysts predicting it to eventually surpass 20 billion barrels. Production is aggressively ramping up over the coming decade.

Hess also remains excellent value thanks to its 30% interest in Starbroek and its significant US shale oil assets, which generate huge amounts of cash at current oil prices. Hess’s interest in the “discovery of the decade” makes it a prime takeover target.

Our non-energy investments are all in resilient industries and have sound balance sheets, so can hold their own when things get tough. Further, they are priced attractively.

We recently acquired shares in Alibaba, China’s leading ecommerce business after its share price fell 70% from its 2020 peak. Revenues and profits are growing soundly, and it trades on a price to earnings multiple of just 12x. Importantly, Alibaba’s core ecommerce business is hugely profitable, in stark contrast to its major competitor Amazon which loses money on ecommerce sales.

The only non-profitable stocks we hold are Energy Resources of Australia (ERA) and Berkeley Energia, which both hold massive undeveloped uranium deposits.

Given the revival of nuclear energy, the outlook for uranium demand is positive. The problem however is that many of the world’s major uranium mines were developed long ago and are now in decline. Moreover, a substantial portion of supply comes from former Soviet states and potentially unstable African countries, making western utilities keen to source supplies from aligned countries.

Globally there are very few high-quality undeveloped uranium deposits. Arguably the best is ERA’s 300-million-pound Jabiluka deposit, discovered in 1971, prior to the formation of the adjacent Kakadu National Park. The Trust has an 8% shareholding in this incredible deposit with Rio Tinto the major shareholder.

Uranium mining has had a contentious history in Australia, and for various reasons the Jabiluka mine has never been developed. A key issue has been opposition from traditional owners; however, opinions can change.

Public perception towards nuclear energy is changing rapidly as the world recognises the need to decarbonise. A deposit of Jabiluka’s size, which can be mined with underground machinery and minimal surface impact, would provide enough clean energy to power Australia for at least 20 years.

At the current uranium price, Jabiluka’s life of mine revenue would be about $25 billion. If developed, the wealth and jobs created by this project would be enormous for both its traditional owners and for Australia. It would play a genuinely important role in the world’s carbon reduction efforts, and it could significantly enhance Australia’s relationships with its key security partners.

 

Willy Packer is the Founder, Managing Director, and an investment manager at Packer & Co. This article contains general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Please seek financial advice before acting on any investment as market circumstances can change.

This article has been extracted from Packer & Co's Investigator Trust Report.

 

13 Comments
AlanB
January 16, 2023

Chernobyl. I fail to understand how any discussion of nuclear energy, like this article, can totally ignore the risks.

Tim
January 14, 2023

Good luck with the Sovereign risk !!

Peter
January 13, 2023

"We have another 7% in Russian oil and gas stocks" - a quote from your article!!!

The western governments are trying to punish the Russians for the invasion of Ukraine and yet your fund remains invested in Russian energy stocks. I don't understand the full implications of the Russian share market trading ban, but I would expect that your fund would take the earliest opportunity to divest all Russian holdings.

Desmond
January 15, 2023

Governments make decisions for political reasons, fund managers have to make decisions which is best for their investors so long as it is legal. There are no morals or ethics when Governments make decisions, are fund managers expected to maintain a " better than though" approach ?

Former Treasury policy maker
January 16, 2023

Of course there are moral and ethical elements to Government decisions! You may not always agree with the ethics, but I can tell you that in the many Government policy matters that I've helped develop, critique, debate over my career there are always questions asked about the social impact and whether it's the right thing to do.

Ian
January 13, 2023

Gael, I believe you are looking forward to fusion nuclear energy. As we all are. But advances in fission technology are also promising and closer to fruition. It's not as bleak as DougC suggests.

DougC
January 13, 2023

We were all looking forward to nuclear fusion in the 1960's - I believe it was called the Omega Project at that time - and we're still "looking forward" to it. The technological complications of achieving it at industrial scale are so great that, if it eventuates, it will likely be well after the time when it might solve the present (and future) energy problems of the planet.

DougC
January 12, 2023

Re; Nuclear energy :
I was peripherally involved with the Berkeley Nuclear Power Station project in the UK in the 1960’s. A senior engineer with the Nuclear Power Group (developing nuclear power stations in the UK) said that the total amount of energy consumed in the production of materials and the construction of the power station was equal to the amount of energy that the nuclear power station would generate in its intended 25 years of operation (before more energy would have to be expended to refurbish and update the station).
That is, there is no net gain from nuclear (fission) power in terms of energy balance and the only justification is not an energy proposition but the greater damage to health and the environment resulting from use of alternative fuels (coal and oil) – ignoring, of course, the possibility of nuclear accident, following which there would be aeons of radiated and uninhabitable land.
Re: Fossil Fuels :
Apart from the impacts of fossil fuels on the climate, there is rarely mention of the fact that most plastics are derived from coal and oil sources (which took about 20 million years to create) and, when we've burned it all, there’ll be no more artificial fibres, acrylic paints, cosmetics, most pharmaceuticals, cable insulation and electrical fittings, plastic film, bitumen/asphalt, adhesives, lubricating oils and greases, plumbing and drainage pipes and fittings, and countless other plastic articles.

Dudley
January 13, 2023

"... there’ll be no more ...":

Sun likely to shine well after the last earthly plastics consumer croaks.
Google is prescient:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212982013000061

Goronwy Price
January 15, 2023

You are absolutely wrong in your assertion that the production of materials and construction is equal to the energy produced. The opposite is true, nuclear has the least material input compared to any power source. It also has the least land use. The latest wind turbines are the height of the Eiffel Tower. You need 300 of these to generate the same energy as a small atomic plant. The nuclear plant will give you power 24/7, the turbines on windy days. A nuclear plant will last 80 years, the nacelle of a turbine 15 max. Then there is all the power lines and their towers you need for 300 wind turbines. You can replace existing coal plants with nuclear, so no new poles and wires. A wind turbine uses 300 gallons of oil per year.

Gael
January 12, 2023

Why accept a ‘growing population’ and not challenge that as part of the solution i.e. reducing population and human demands on this planet. You raise 'underinvestment in exploration' for fossil The argument always seems to be on the Supply side and not the unsustainable Demand side (growing population and their demands).
Nuclear is only ‘clean’ until it goes wrong. Then it is so ‘dirty’ that it can be catastrophic. In 30 years time we may have fission energy and that is the safe, sustainable clean energy.

George Hamor
January 12, 2023

I agree totally Gael, but how do you reduce global population?

Gael
January 12, 2023

There are always solutions.
The recognition of the need to reduce population is the first step then Government direction and people will follow. Australian (immigration aside) would be on a path to reduced population as the average child per woman is less than 1.8.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Ukraine-Russia conflict update: Compendium of research

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

2024/25 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ATO has released all the superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2024. Here's what’s changing and what’s not, and some key considerations and opportunities in the lead up to 30 June and beyond.

Five months on from cancer diagnosis

Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.

Is Australia ready for its population growth over the next decade?

Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 552 with weekend update

Being rich is having a high-paying job and accumulating fancy houses and cars, while being wealthy is owning assets that provide passive income, as well as freedom and flexibility. Knowing the difference can reframe your life.

  • 21 March 2024

Why LICs may be close to bottoming

Investor disgust, consolidation, de-listings, price discounts, activist investors entering - it’s what typically happens at business cycle troughs, and it’s happening to LICs now. That may present a potential opportunity.

Uncomfortable truths: The real cost of living in retirement

How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Uncomfortable truths: The real cost of living in retirement

How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.

Shares

On the virtue of owning wonderful businesses like CBA

The US market has pummelled Australia's over the past 16 years and for good reason: it has some incredible businesses. Australia does too, but if you want to enjoy US-type returns, you need to know where to look.

Investment strategies

Why bank hybrids are being priced at a premium

As long as the banks have no desire to pay up for term deposit funding - which looks likely for a while yet - investors will continue to pay a premium for the higher yielding, but riskier hybrid instrument.

Investment strategies

The Magnificent Seven's dominance poses ever-growing risks

The rise of the Magnificent Seven and their large weighting in US indices has led to debate about concentration risk in markets. Whatever your view, the crowding into these stocks poses several challenges for global investors.

Strategy

Wealth is more than a number

Money can bolster our joy in real ways. However, if we relentlessly chase wealth at the expense of other facets of well-being, history and science both teach us that it will lead to a hollowing out of life.

The copper bull market may have years to run

The copper market is barrelling towards a significant deficit and price surge over the next few decades that investors should not discount when looking at the potential for artificial intelligence and renewable energy.

Property

Global REITs are on sale

Global REITs have been out of favour for some time. While office remains a concern, the rest of the sector is in good shape and offers compelling value, with many REITs trading below underlying asset replacement costs.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.