Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 72

Changes to Centrelink treatment of account-based pensions

From 1 January 2015 the way account-based income streams (including account-based pensions) will be assessed under the income test for Centrelink purposes is changing.

The age pension rules

Any account-based pension commenced on or after 1 January 2015 will be treated as a financial asset and deemed under the income test.

Account-based pensions commenced prior to 1 January 2015 where the pensioner is in receipt of Centrelink benefits at 1 January 2015 will be grandfathered under the existing rules.

Where the grandfathering conditions are not met or where a person ceases to receive Centrelink entitlements, their pension will be treated under the deeming rules when the person next applies for the age pension. As such any existing pension held by persons who are not receiving Centrelink entitlements at 1 January 2015 will be assessed as a financial asset under the income test.

Also, consider a household on the ‘border’ currently receiving a small age pension entitlement. If good investment returns are experienced, the value of their assets may increase and this may cause them to lose their age pension entitlement. Following this, the pension is then assessed as a deemed income stream for future age pension entitlements.

The table below outlines the changes. Please note the treatment for the assets test is not changing.

Deciding what to do before 1 January 2015

There has been a lot of discussion around what decisions could be made to maximise the income test and ultimately the long term age pension outcome for clients with existing pensions who are in receipt of Centrelink benefits prior to 1 January 2015 including:

1.  Would ‘rebooting’ (ie. commuting and recommencing) any existing pensions prior to 1 January provide a better deduction amount?

As the social security changes relate to pensions commencing on or after 1 January 2015, rebooting a pension before that date will lock in the relevant deduction amount for any future age pension assessment.

If the pension is rebooted after 1 January 2015, the deduction amount will be irrelevant as the pension will be assessed as a deemed income stream for future age pension entitlements.

2.  Would a change to death benefit nominations affect the grandfathered rules for the pensioner’s spouse?

Where a pensioner with a grandfathered account-based pension passes away, the pension will only continue to be treated as grandfathered under the income test where the pension automatically continues to be paid to a reversionary beneficiary, and where the beneficiary is also in receipt of Centrelink benefits.

Unless the terms of the pension specify an automatic reversion, the death benefit pension may fall under the new deeming rules. Note that changing the death benefit nominations of a pension to be automatically reversionary may involve rebooting the account-based pension.

Age pension implications

The age pension entitlement under the income test for a deemed account-based pension in the short term may lead to lower pension entitlements, but there may come a point during retirement where the entitlement using the deeming rules is greater than the entitlement under the grandfathered rules. At this point, depending on the person’s particular circumstances, the member may consider whether or not to reboot their pension (to be assessed under the deeming rules) to help maximise their age pension entitlement as highlighted in the following case study.

Case study: income test decision point

Consider Fred and Jane:

  • a 65-year-old couple
  • assets of $500,000 all held in Fred’s SMSF
  • spend $58,000 per annum increasing in line with inflation.

Fred retired during 2014 and commenced an account-based pension with all of his SMSF assets.

Fred and Jane are currently eligible for a part age pension from Centrelink and the income test rules applying to Fred’s account-based pension will be grandfathered from 1 January 2015. Their $58,000 of spending will be partly sourced from the age pension and partly from the SMSF assets.

If the SMSF earns 4% p.a. real returns (over and above inflation) then in this example we would expect their SMSF balance to reduce over time. By modelling the drawdown of the SMSF assets we can compare all three Centrelink means tests in future years:

(a)  income test under the grandfathered rules
(b)  income test under the new deeming rules
(c)  assets test

(a) Age pension entitlements – grandfathered rules

The graph below shows the projected age pension entitlement under both the assets test and the grandfathered income test rules.

The black lines represent the asset test entitlement in each year, and the orange line the income test entitlement based on the existing deduction amount rules.

We see initially the asset test is dominant, and then at age 80 the income test takes over to determine the age pension received. The age pension entitlement reduces after age 80 because the income test deduction amount is reducing in today’s purchasing power.

The total payments from the age pension between now and age 90, in today’s purchasing power, is approximately $763,000. The example assumes that the Centrelink thresholds and rates keep pace with inflation over time.

(b) Age pension entitlements – deeming rules

If Fred decided to commute and recommence his pension at 1 January 2015 then the pension would be deemed under the income test. The means test results using the deeming rules is shown below in blue.

The income test takes over at age 78, two years earlier than under the grandfathered rules. The total payments from the age pension between now and age 90, in today’s purchasing power, is approximately $789,000.

What Fred and Jane really need to do is look at what this means overall …

Centrelink entitlements – grandfathering, then switching

Examining both graphs in this case study; we can see that Fred and Jane will receive less age pension from age 78 to age 80 under the deeming rules, then from age 81 onwards the deeming rules provide a higher income test entitlement.

The graph below illustrates all three means test outcomes:

Switching over to the deeming rules by rebooting the grandfathered pension at age 81 may help maximise the age pension during the period that the income test determines the pension received.

From the date of commutation onwards Fred is then locked in to the deeming rules and can’t re-elect to have the grandfathered rules apply. But we can see that under these assumptions the highest Centrelink entitlements come from opting for the deeming rules as assets deplete. In this example, the age pension entitlement increases to the full age pension in later years rather than continuing to decline. The total payments from the age pension between now and age 90, in today’s purchasing power, is approximately $790,000.

Fred and Jane’s actual decision would need to be monitored over time to take into account fund values, ongoing spending plans and Centrelink rates and bands at the time.

Grandfathering considerations

There may be some advantages of commencing or rebooting account-based pensions before 31 December 2014, thereby locking in existing rules for clients who are in receipt of Centrelink entitlements. These include:

  • The income test entitlement may be lower in the short term under the new deeming rules, so if the income test is determining the client’s age pension entitlement, the existing rules may be more advantageous.
  • Grandfathered pensions won’t be exposed to the risk of increased deeming rates in the future.
  • A pension may be rebooted at any later date to enable the pension to be assessed under the new deeming rules.

Based on the above, it appears that grandfathered pensions will provide the most flexibility in potential social security outcomes for clients. However, rules continue to change and retirees need to stay on top of entitlement amendments.

 

Melanie Dunn is SMSF Technical Services Manager at Accurium (formerly Bendzulla Actuarial). This information illustrates social security treatment of income streams only and is not intended to be financial product advice, legal advice or tax advice, and should not be relied upon as such. Individuals should seek appropriate professional advice before making any financial decisions.

 

7 Comments
Not giving advice
June 26, 2018

Martin, call the Australian Tax Office on 132865 and talk to them. They will tell you what you need to know.

MARTIN
June 25, 2018

I AM A SINGLE AGED PENSIONER...I GET A PART AUST AGE PENSION ...AND A UK AGE PART PENSION....I GET A BIT OF INTEREST FROM THE BANK...ADDING THEM ALL UP...COMES TO ...JUST OVER $25000 PA...WILL I NEED TO FILL A TAX RETURN AND WILL I NEED TO PAY TAX ON THAT AMOUNT....??....

Ms Grump
June 26, 2018

Apart from having no details about you, kindly note that any country's official answer will be, if you earn income, check with a professional regarding whether you need to file a return.

By the way, writing IN ALL CAPS is usually recognized as SHOUTING, and therefore a bit rude.

Not giving advice
June 26, 2018

That's not actually true, Ms Grump - the bit about the tax office will point you to getting professional advice.

Here's the ATO's on-line tool to help people work out whether they need to lodge a return or not: https://www.ato.gov.au/Calculators-and-tools/Do-I-need-to-lodge-a-tax-return/

So Martin, I assume since you posted on Cuffelinks that you're computer literate, so just go to the ATO website via this link and work it out for yourself.

Neil Kozlowski
August 23, 2017

Hi
I have been receiving a part Age Pension for over 4 years & recently I had the misfortune to have my Grandfathered Allocated Pension treated under the Deeming rules, simply because for one fortnight my earnings exceeded the maximum Income Threshold.

From what I understand my Allocated Pension should only be treated under the Deeming rules if I actually reapplied for the Age Pension, refer a quote on your website ("Where the grandfathering conditions are not met or where a person ceases to receive Centrelink entitlements, their pension will be treated under the deeming rules when the person next applies for the age pension"

Are you able to advise me whether or not I have a case to challenge Centrelink

Thank you

Graham Hand
August 23, 2017

Sorry, Neil, Cuffelinks is not licensed to give personal financial advice on such a specific subject. I will refer your question to the author who might respond.

Darryl Leeder
September 28, 2014

What is the asset threshold for me a 65 year old who wants to get pension but not for wife who is nearly 4years younger than me.I supposeyou could also tell me what is the income limit as well.
thanksdarryl

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The distortions in our retirement system

Check pension outcomes when making a will

Check the Centrelink rules before gifting

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

Avoiding wealth transfer pitfalls

Australia is in the early throes of an intergenerational wealth transfer worth an estimated $3.5 trillion. Here's a case study highlighting some of the challenges with transferring wealth between generations.

Taxpayers betrayed by Future Fund debacle

The Future Fund's original purpose was to meet the unfunded liabilities of Commonwealth defined benefit schemes. These liabilities have ballooned to an estimated $290 billion and taxpayers continue to be treated like fools.

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

Looking beyond banks for dividend income

The Big Four banks have had an extraordinary run and it’s left income investors with a conundrum: to stick with them even though they now offer relatively low dividend yields and limited growth prospects or to look elsewhere.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

Investment strategies

Time to announce the X-factor for 2024

What is the X-factor - the largely unexpected influence that wasn’t thought about when the year began but came from left field to have powerful effects on investment returns - for 2024? It's time to select the winner.

Shares

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

It’s halfway through the 2020s decade and time to get a scorecheck on the Australian stock market. The picture isn't pretty as Aussie shares are having a below-average decade so far, though history shows that all is not lost.

Shares

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Four years ago, we introduced our 'bubbles' chart to show how the market had become concentrated in one type of stock and one view of the future. This looks at what, if anything, has changed, and what it means for investors.

Shares

Is Medibank Private a bargain?

Regulatory tensions have weighed on Medibank's share price though it's unlikely that the government will step in and prop up private hospitals. This creates an opportunity to invest in Australia’s largest health insurer.

Shares

Negative correlations, positive allocations

A nascent theme today is that the inverse correlation between bonds and stocks has returned as inflation and economic growth moderate. This broadens the potential for risk-adjusted returns in multi-asset portfolios.

Retirement

The secret to a good retirement

An Australian anthropologist studying Japanese seniors has come to a counter-intuitive conclusion to what makes for a great retirement: she suggests the seeds may be found in how we approach our working years.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.