Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 56

Consider a Debt Agreement before you resort to bankruptcy

There are circumstances where a person is able to propose a ‘Debt Agreement’, which is a relatively low cost alternative to bankruptcy.

In the financial year ended 30 June 2013, just under 10,000 people filed Debt Agreements. That figure was up nearly 8% on the number in the previous financial year.

Debt Agreements enable creditors to receive a return which they may not otherwise receive in the event of a bankruptcy. A debtor can offer assets to creditors, such as funds from family members or other assets. It means that creditors can receive a higher dividend while the debtor avoids entering into bankruptcy.

Prior to 1996, there were few alternatives available to a person who was unable to pay their debts when they fell due, which resulted in insolvency. Whilst voluntary bankruptcy was available, it was often considered an undesirable outcome. Many would have preferred to enter into an agreement with their creditors. Fortunately, in 1996 some alternatives became available, including a Debt Agreement.

Four alternatives for creditors

As it stands today, if an individual is unable to pay creditors, four alternatives may be considered:

  • reach a private arrangement with all creditors
  • enter into voluntary bankruptcy
  • enter into a Personal Insolvency Agreement
  • enter into a Debt Agreement – the focus of this article.

A Debt Agreement is processed through Insolvency Trustee Service Australia’s Debt Agreement Service (DAS). It receives Debt Agreement proposals, conducts a voting of creditors and maintains records.

There are some situations when a Debt Agreement is not available, such as:

  • where a person’s unsecured debts exceed $100,664.20
  • if a person’s after-tax income for the last financial year exceeds $75,498.15 (amount indexed twice annually)
  • if a person is not insolvent.

A debtor who proposes a Debt Agreement must provide the Official Receiver with a written proposal, which must be in an approved form and:

  • properly identify the debtors to be dealt with under the Agreement
  • specify how the identified property is to be dealt with
  • authorise a nominated person to deal with the identified property in accordance with the terms of the proposal.

A person cannot propose a Debt Agreement if at any time during the past ten years, they have been bankrupt or been a party to another Debt Agreement. Any person who proposes a Debt Agreement must accept that the proposing of the Debt Agreement constitutes an act of Bankruptcy pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act.

Once a Debt Agreement is accepted for processing, the Official Receiver must provide a copy of the proposal to each creditor.

A Debt Agreement must be accepted by the majority of creditors (by value) within the ‘applicable deadline’. Following acceptance, a creditor cannot apply for alternative enforcement of the Debt. Further, a Sheriff must not take any action or further action to execute or sell property under any process issued by a Court, or to enforce the payment of any debt which is the subject of a Debt Agreement.

Once a Debt Agreement is in place, Section 185(N) of the Bankruptcy Act releases the debtor from all provable debts upon the completion of the Agreement. Completion usually occurs once the debtor has fulfilled the promise made in the Debt Agreement.

A person proposing a Debt Agreement must accept that if there is any property which is otherwise secured to a creditor, then the secured creditor is still able to deal with that property, irrespective of whether or not a Debt Agreement is approved.

Here’s another catch

There are provisions within the Bankruptcy Act which enable a Court, in certain circumstances, to declare a Debt Agreement void.

The principal advantage of a Debt Agreement is that a debtor is not required to declare bankruptcy. However, as the Debt Agreement is an act of bankruptcy, if the Debt Agreement is not accepted by the creditors, then any individual creditor is able to rely on the proposal of a Debt Agreement, as an act of bankruptcy for the purpose of applying to a Court to make the debtor bankrupt.

 

Terry Morgan is a Partner of Baker Love Lawyers.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is growth of zombie companies real or fiction?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.